- Nov 1, 2006
- Reaction score
What is the proof that the Expected value and Variance of a Poisson variable with parameter "m" are "m" itself?
We are thrilled to welcome Capra Leather to the Styleforum family of official Affiliate Vendors.They are a hand crafted, made to order leather goods family company. Their products have unique designs with a aesthetic that blend minimalism, tradition and functionality. Focused on sustainability they offer a lifetime warranty on every piece.
Give Capra a warm welcome on their Official Affiliate Thread
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Serious? No clue. But I do know that my Mathematician and Statistician friends would be mad that you're confusing the two. Mods, change the title to "Stats geeks:..."
F you for knowing that. Now go slam yourself into a locker and give me your lunch money.
Since the poisson distribution is discrete, the proof isn't trivial. You just can't do the integral. You are gonna have to do the summations, and there is probably a summation trick or two in there to get it all looking nice and elegant. Set up the definition of expected value and variance and you will see this.
Also, for a math proof like this, you can't set them equal to each other. You solve each one of them individually, and show that the result is the same.
In this case, you need to find the find the mean in order to find the variance. And since the terms are sitting inside the summation, nothing will cancel.
rdawson i think your way is wrong but thats because i may have screwed up the original post.