(kalra2411 @ 15 July 2004, 5:04) Actually, Mr. Watch Expert the Cartier Chrono-Reflex has been deemed a far finer movement than most automatic movements on the market, by such esteemed publications as Horology International, Catro D'Vesquela and COSC Bi-Annual Review. Therefore, why you constantly call it an inferior quartz movement also brings me many laughs. Shows how much you understand, I said automatic movement, not mechanical (i.e. wound) - a tourbillion is a complication. I would not know why the Chrono-Reflex is better than most automatic movements, but as you should know, three much esteemed publications in the world of watches have said so. which publications? 3 among how many? 150? paid by Cartier? Horology International, Catro D'Vesquela and COSC Bi-Annual Review. which mounth? what did they say exactly? If Â chronoflex is so good why : 1) Is he so "cheap" comparing the other automatik or quartz Cartier's watches ? 2) Â Is he so cheap comparing to other automatic movement from Patek or JL? Is Cartier becoming a mecene? Catro D'Vesquela - May 1999 Horology International - June 1999 COSC Bi-Annual Review - 2nd Issue 1999 Cheap? 1. Costs more than any other version of the Tank. 2. Cartier cost far more than most similar JL You do not know, you just say things. A roaster costs 3 500 euros / A grandpsort cost 5 000 euros The cheapest Cartier costs less than 1 500 euros / The cheapest JL costs more than 3 000 euros As you think level of prices means the BRAND is better, good news as you will admit PATEK is much BETTER than CARTIER, and that JL is better than CARTIER. You are talking nonsense, JL Reverso 500 pounds.. WHY HAVE YOU GIVEN RANDOM INCORRECT PRICES?