acinod
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2013
- Messages
- 215
- Reaction score
- 8
I've been searching for some time for the most versatile shoe outside of a full suit. It needed to have the following properties:
I have narrowed my options down to the following:
Loake Pimlico in Dark Brown Suede
The Loake Pimlico are quite beautiful and elegant. The Dainite sole allows it to work in foul weather yet being comfortable to wear. There is a leather version but I prefer suede due to its more casual nature and the soft texture it provides. I also like the capital last (I have the Aldwych) so I prefer the Pimlico over the Kempton (another Loake chukka with different last).
Red Wing Beckman 9016 in Cigar Featherstone
The Red Wing Beckman 9016 I'm sure is more well-known here. They take a while to break-in but I heard they will become incredibly comfortable in the long run. The rugged nature of the boot allows me to be more careless with it and the cigar featherstone leather is also of amazing quality. I also like the soft black laces which contrast very nice with the cigar colour.
Although I love both boots, unfortunately I can only choose one.
LOOK: The Pimlico has a much more elegant toe shape and the soft texture of the suede looks so beautiful. Though in some photos, I am drawn to the rich colour of the featherstone leather in the Beckmans. Personally I think the Pimlico look better.
VERSATILITY: I own 3 pairs of pants: N&F Weird Guys, Epaulet Khaki Chinos and Epaulet Oxford Grey Flannel. Both the Pimlico and Beckman pair very nicely with all these pants. They are also versatile for all dress occassions except for business formal. Although I think the Pimlico may be a bit more versatile due to its darker colour and will be more appropriate for the dressier side of business casual.
FUNCTION: Ultimately, no matter how nice or versatile a shoe is, it is useless if it cannot fulfill its function. I plan to travel to NYC/Chicago this Christmas and I will be taking one of these boots with me. It will take me from the airport to the hotel and for many miles of walking/shopping/sightseeing in a NYC/Chicago winter. The main concern with the Pimlico is that I'm not sure how the suede will fare against the rain/snow that I might encounter. I've worn suede before but I live in Australia and our winters are mild at best. I've had conflicting opinions on suede in rain but I am not afraid to take care of them. The Beckmans' seem like a better choice against foul weather but I'm worried they won't be comfortable in time for my trip next month. I heard the break-in period can take from a few weeks to several months!
So Loake Pimlico or Red Wing Beckman 9016?
- Able to be worn with raw denim, khaki chinos and grey flannel trousers
- Able to be worn comfortably on rainy days
- My go to travel shoe - need to be able to walk in them for the whole day
- Elegant and beautiful
- Under $350
I have narrowed my options down to the following:
Loake Pimlico in Dark Brown Suede
The Loake Pimlico are quite beautiful and elegant. The Dainite sole allows it to work in foul weather yet being comfortable to wear. There is a leather version but I prefer suede due to its more casual nature and the soft texture it provides. I also like the capital last (I have the Aldwych) so I prefer the Pimlico over the Kempton (another Loake chukka with different last).
Red Wing Beckman 9016 in Cigar Featherstone
The Red Wing Beckman 9016 I'm sure is more well-known here. They take a while to break-in but I heard they will become incredibly comfortable in the long run. The rugged nature of the boot allows me to be more careless with it and the cigar featherstone leather is also of amazing quality. I also like the soft black laces which contrast very nice with the cigar colour.
Although I love both boots, unfortunately I can only choose one.
LOOK: The Pimlico has a much more elegant toe shape and the soft texture of the suede looks so beautiful. Though in some photos, I am drawn to the rich colour of the featherstone leather in the Beckmans. Personally I think the Pimlico look better.
VERSATILITY: I own 3 pairs of pants: N&F Weird Guys, Epaulet Khaki Chinos and Epaulet Oxford Grey Flannel. Both the Pimlico and Beckman pair very nicely with all these pants. They are also versatile for all dress occassions except for business formal. Although I think the Pimlico may be a bit more versatile due to its darker colour and will be more appropriate for the dressier side of business casual.
FUNCTION: Ultimately, no matter how nice or versatile a shoe is, it is useless if it cannot fulfill its function. I plan to travel to NYC/Chicago this Christmas and I will be taking one of these boots with me. It will take me from the airport to the hotel and for many miles of walking/shopping/sightseeing in a NYC/Chicago winter. The main concern with the Pimlico is that I'm not sure how the suede will fare against the rain/snow that I might encounter. I've worn suede before but I live in Australia and our winters are mild at best. I've had conflicting opinions on suede in rain but I am not afraid to take care of them. The Beckmans' seem like a better choice against foul weather but I'm worried they won't be comfortable in time for my trip next month. I heard the break-in period can take from a few weeks to several months!
So Loake Pimlico or Red Wing Beckman 9016?