Like This Watch?

[AnGeLiCbOrIs]

 

[gdl203]

I've seen worse

 

[Philip1978]

It's ok.

 

[PandArts]

...I said yes but I think I'd like it better on a leather strap...

 

[bcate3]

I would've liked it better if it didn't have the roman numerals. they spoil the dial's more modern design and clash with the arabic numbers in the subdial and date window.

 

[longskate88]

How about a simple Pontos sub-seconds? It's 43mm and very simply, and comes in a couple different color combos.

 

[JayJay]

It's not to my taste, but not bad.

 

[SirWilliam]

It is pretty good looking but if it costs more than $1000 I would buy a better brand.

 

[Parker]

Looks a bit like a Dalí painting. i.e. I don't like it.

 

[AnGeLiCbOrIs]

It is available for $1100 today only. Apparently, that is a very good price for this watch.

My first reaction was that it does not offend me and I like the grand date and GMT complications but there was nothing drawing me to it.

 

[chuckseabreeze]

Originally Posted by AnGeLiCbOrIs

...but there was nothing drawing me to it.

Don't get it.

 

[Cas Ruffin]

As far as those types of watches go, what's not to like? I wouldn't buy it though.

 

[aragon765]

we used to say in retail "don't buy for the buy, buy for the sell" ie, don't buy something just b/c it is a good deal from a vendor, buy it when you know you can sell it!

In this situation, I would not buy it just because "you can get a great deal on it".... if you don't like it (or are impartial) $1100 is a lot of money to spend on something, just becuase you got a deal on it...

 

[EdenResident]

That's ugly. Sorry.

 

[harryhandlebars]

It's ok, I personally prefer either more slim with a leather strap or more complicated (brietling etc) like that.
-Harry