• Hi, I'm the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Is Martina Hingis the Transformer of tennis?

kinglear

Active Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2006
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Martina Hingis

martina93wimbledoncopy.jpg

Martina Hingis playing at 1993 junior Wimbledon

If you don't know who Martina Hingis is, she won Wimbledon, the Australian Open and the US Open at 16 years old in 1997. She won two more Australian Opens, one in 1998 and one in 1999. She retired in 2002, and made her comeback at the beginning of 2006. She went from being ranked No. 349 to No. 7 in one year. That's freakin amazing. And here's another fun fact: she's the 2nd woman to win Wimbledon. The only younger woman to win Wimbledon was 15 in 1887. DAMN!


I wrote this recently because it just came to me. I figured I'd post it.

Is Martina Hingis the Transformer of tennis?

There are structures that are made of hard, cold and shiny steel and bruise with excruciating force that rule the world, but these structures are often one-dimensional beasts who underestimate small structures that are less shiny and seemingly less powerful. This small structure can often deceive the larger structures by transforming their strengths into her strengths, which is always nothing short of magic.


Like the shape shifting characters from the classic 1980s sci-fi series, “Transformers,” Martina Hingis is inarguably the transformer of the tennis world. Like a wizard, Hingis transforms pummeling shots thrown at her into slicing drop shots that cut off points as smoothly and quickly as a knife through butter. She transforms her opponents’ serves into unreachable returns that are near back-breaking.


What is so impressive and unearthly about Martina Hingis is how she can adjust her playing style to her opponent’s style of play. She is not about just hitting balls to simply get them over the net; she instead may hit two shots to her opponent’s forehand on the deuce side of the court and then on the third shot she drop shots the ball to the corner of the add sideline. Voila! The point is over. Or Hingis could perform her trademark combination of a drop shot (which somehow doesn’t end the point) followed by a top spinning lob that 9 times out of 10 lands in or on the line.


Hingis’ petite 5’7” frame makes her very deceptive, so that’s why she must use her brain to quietly attack her opponents’ power shots. That’s why she is the transformer of the game because she molds her game into different shapes and components that all fit together to form a magnificent puzzle. The majestic drop shots, the lobs, the backhands down the lines, and classic volleying are like the kings, queens, bishops and pawns that maneuver around a chessboard. In her 2006 comeback, Martina Hingis is transforming her game once again by adding more power to her shots, which allows her to go blow for blow with the most imposing ball busters on the WTA tour. If Hingis never played professional tennis again, her elegant play will be forever remembered as making tennis a more intelligent and complex sport.
 

wEstSidE

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
1,691
Reaction score
36
She was a very good player. However, Roger Federer by far has the most control over anything of any player I've ever seen. He can do whatever he wants with the ball 8 times out of 10.
 

kinglear

Active Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2006
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by wEstSidE
She was a very good player. However, Roger Federer by far has the most control over anything of any player I've ever seen. He can do whatever he wants with the ball 8 times out of 10.

First off, I reworked some of the paragraphs, just to inform you.

Roger is quite brilliant and he makes his brilliance look effortless. It actually reminds me of classic tennis players all the way back to the earlier part of the 20th Century. He's the kind of player who still serves and vollies, which is nice to see. I'm 20 years old, but I prefer the more traditional style. Today's tennis has a lot of strength and "gusto" (haha) but it doesn't really look like tennis. It looks like some other kind of sport. Sometimes I think they should name today's tennis something else.
confused.gif
I think Justine is a very good player, but I still prefer a player with the style of Anastasia Myskina or up-and-comer Anna Chakvetadze (who's very Hingis-like). That's just me though.
smile.gif
Although I do adore Monica Seles. Her intensity will NEVER be duplicated.
 

Featured Sponsor

What is the most important handwork to have on a shirt?

  • Hand attached collar

    Votes: 16 30.2%
  • Handsewn button holes

    Votes: 17 32.1%
  • Hand finish on yolk and shoulders

    Votes: 20 37.7%

Forum statistics

Threads
494,364
Messages
10,469,859
Members
220,568
Latest member
SeaFoul
Top