• I'm happy to introduce the Styleforum Happy Hour, our brand new podcast featuring lively discussion about menswear and the fashion industry. In the inaugural edition, a discussion of what's going on in retail today. Please check it out on the Journal. All episodes will be also be available soon on your favorite podcast platform.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Is it just silly?

Connemara

[URL='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jST2Sv63WQ']
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
39,510
Reaction score
1,758
This is (not mine) a Hickey Freeman 3-button, circa 1961. Do you find the lapels to be so small that they look foolish? Opinions appreciated.

 

gdl203

Affiliate Vendor
Affiliate Vendor
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Jun 9, 2005
Messages
39,947
Reaction score
28,587
They are small. But they may look a little wider and longer if the top button was not fastened and the lapels rolled naturally to the second button?
 

EL72

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
6,860
Reaction score
4
The lapels look odd because the suit is too small for the model. Also, the shirt collar is too wide a spread for the lapels.
 

chorse123

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
10,448
Reaction score
75
Originally Posted by gdl203
But they may look a little wider and longer if the top button was not fastened and the lapels rolled naturally to the second button?

Ditto. They would look a little bigger, and it wouldn't be such a bother. Also, a pocket square would help.
 

itsstillmatt

The Liberator
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
14,384
Reaction score
2,073
Depends. On a skinny guy, I like thn lapels, but long thin ones. I think it especially nice on a young guy.
 

Connemara

[URL='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jST2Sv63WQ']
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
39,510
Reaction score
1,758
I don't think it's a 3-2, check out this pic.



Having a small frame (36), and with the suit being quite small on the model (it's a slim 38), I may be able to make it work.
 

Get Smart

Don't Crink
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Messages
12,234
Reaction score
227
I like it. Lapel width is just right. One thing I'd do is taper the trousers a bit because it looks wide to be worn with no break, as the model is wearing. The suit doesnt look too small for the model, but the sleeves could be lengthened ½ inch. Agree the shirt collar isnt the best choice for the suit.
 

Ivan Kipling

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2006
Messages
2,114
Reaction score
1
To do it right, you need vintage shirt, tie, shoes, and accessories.
 

lee_44106

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
8,106
Reaction score
85
The location of the pocket on the shirt is the reason why I always wear pocket-less shirts.
 

skalogre

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
6,324
Reaction score
4
To be honest, I don't think it is too bad. I'd think you'd have to be a member of this board to really notice it
 

Jovan

Banned for Good
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
2,533
Reaction score
0
I love suits with a gradual three rolled to two stance. It's what I'm getting for my next.
 

drax

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
I like the suit and i think with a few minor adjustments it could look very cool. Id lengthen the sleeve by at least an inch and look for a shirt with a collar in keeping with the scale of the lapels. The shirt in the pic is too big for the model - it sags at the neck - and is cut a bit loose for the body too - what it needs is the narrower body that would come with one of those ralph shirts. Ralph Lauren black label does smaller 60's style collar shirts that would fit well with the jackets scale. id hazard that the middle button on the jacket is sitting a little north of the navel - which is ok in a sixties suit but can exaggerate the shrunken look
I think the pants are about a 1 inch too short too although if you shortened them by three inches instead its total tom browne!
 

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Featured Sponsor

How many pairs of shoes do you own?

  • 1 - 4

    Votes: 32 3.8%
  • 5 - 10

    Votes: 144 17.1%
  • 11 - 20

    Votes: 278 33.1%
  • 21 - 30

    Votes: 132 15.7%
  • 31 - 40

    Votes: 71 8.4%
  • 41 - 50

    Votes: 49 5.8%
  • 51 - 60

    Votes: 25 3.0%
  • 61 - 70

    Votes: 22 2.6%
  • 71 - 80

    Votes: 17 2.0%
  • 81 - 90

    Votes: 8 1.0%
  • 91 - 100

    Votes: 9 1.1%
  • 100+

    Votes: 54 6.4%

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
429,241
Messages
9,231,026
Members
193,770
Latest member
Alex2045
Top