Dismiss Notice

STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Ill-designed things that are pissing you off

Discussion in 'Fine Living, Home, Design & Auto' started by MetroStyles, Jul 5, 2010.

  1. CrazyJew

    CrazyJew Senior member

    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 27, 2010
    Location:
    Tampa, FL


  2. Reggs

    Reggs Senior member

    Messages:
    5,564
    Likes Received:
    384
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Location:
    The Internet
    Fuckin' miracles
     


  3. kakemono

    kakemono Senior member

    Messages:
    508
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    I've never turned my phone off or even to airplane mode.... just let it sit in my pocket. It doesn't affect anything. The law was passed before we had a strong grip on telecommunications and the effect of being inside the tube of metal. At least that's what I was always told. I flew about 75 times in the last year - no issues.

    Can openers are stupidly easy to break. Pisses me off...
     


  4. ratboycom

    ratboycom Senior member

    Messages:
    3,682
    Likes Received:
    6
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2006
    Location:
    Nagoya, Japan
    Children's fishing poles. When did they turn to such pieces of shit. I have tried Zebco and Shakespeare for closed reel casting combos for my nephew and cousin and both have fallen apart after about the 3rd trip to the lake or get all tangled to fuck on the inside with regular use.
    When I was a kid, that shit would last. These arent even the shitty like Spiderman poles or anything, its the "big kid" style pole that is a few feet long.
     


  5. gomestar

    gomestar Super Yelper

    Messages:
    19,407
    Likes Received:
    3,873
    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Location:
    NYC
    Most wall anchors I have ever tried. 75% of them have destroyed a chunk of my wall, erased my patience, and emptied my wallet to buy supplies and paint to fix the stupid ass hole.
     


  6. username79

    username79 Senior member

    Messages:
    2,145
    Likes Received:
    13
    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Most wall anchors I have ever tried. 75% of them have destroyed a chunk of my wall, erased my patience, and emptied my wallet to buy supplies and paint to fix the stupid ass hole.

    I had very good luck with Wall Dogs.
     


  7. gomestar

    gomestar Super Yelper

    Messages:
    19,407
    Likes Received:
    3,873
    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Location:
    NYC
    I had very good luck with Wall Dogs.

    noted, thank you.
     


  8. otc

    otc Senior member

    Messages:
    14,968
    Likes Received:
    4,557
    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2008
    I have to fly twice a week for work. [​IMG]

    For the last 4 years.


    I was not aware that SF posting had such a travel commitment

    I've never turned my phone off or even to airplane mode.... just let it sit in my pocket. It doesn't affect anything. The law was passed before we had a strong grip on telecommunications and the effect of being inside the tube of metal. At least that's what I was always told. I flew about 75 times in the last year - no issues.

    Actually the no-phone rule is an FCC rule and not the FAA. The FAA wants everything off during takeoff (mostly because they want people paying attention and able to move quickly since most crashes occur at takeoff/landing...not because they might interfere). The reason they don't want you to have your phone turned on on a plane is that it puts a hell of a lot of stress on the mobile phone infrastructure. The towers have directional antennas that are angled down at the ground (you know...where people are), it takes a lot more tower resources to provide a connection to a phone that is flying in the sky. Also, towers were designed to make infrequent handoffs, but when you are going 500mph, they have to make handoffs every few seconds which puts a lot of strain on the network.
     


  9. why

    why Senior member

    Messages:
    9,735
    Likes Received:
    405
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2007
    Who designed and perpetrates the design of shopping carts? People realized a while ago that maneuvering wheeled vehicles is easier by pulling than pushing, yet despite the advice of the axiom designers continue to put the cart before the horse. The result is rickety squealing carts confounding housewives trying to steer between the potato chips and canned soup.
     


  10. why

    why Senior member

    Messages:
    9,735
    Likes Received:
    405
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2007


  11. itsstillmatt

    itsstillmatt The Liberator Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    14,384
    Likes Received:
    2,048
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Location:
    The wild and the pure.
    Who designed and perpetrates the design of shopping carts? People realized a while ago that maneuvering wheeled vehicles is easier by pulling than pushing, yet despite the advice of the axiom designers continue to put the cart before the horse. The result is rickety squealing carts confounding housewives trying to steer between the potato chips and canned soup.
    I'm picturing obese women strapped in harnesses pulling their shopping carts through neon lighted aisles. It is not pretty.
     


  12. bbaquiran

    bbaquiran Senior member

    Messages:
    3,101
    Likes Received:
    311
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2007
    Who designed and perpetrates the design of shopping carts? People realized a while ago that maneuvering wheeled vehicles is easier by pulling than pushing, yet despite the advice of the axiom designers continue to put the cart before the horse. The result is rickety squealing carts confounding housewives trying to steer between the potato chips and canned soup.

    I think the current design is dictated by users wanting to be able to see the items they've selected in front of them.
     


  13. Kyoung05

    Kyoung05 Senior member

    Messages:
    361
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    I think the current design is dictated by users wanting to be able to see the items they've selected in front of them.

    Well that, and what about not having to toss the shit you want to buy behind your back hoping it lands behind you safety in your cart???
     


  14. impolyt_one

    impolyt_one Senior member

    Messages:
    14,457
    Likes Received:
    4,790
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Location:
    The Temple of Jawnz
    The duty frees do not have such wonderous elixirs; I keep the chartreuse bottles in my check-in luggage.

    One has to make do with Dewar's White Label or indifferent champagnes like Veuve Clicquot at the duty frees.


    VCP vintage 2002 is pretty good stuff, not in the same league as the bottom rung yellow label NV swill.
     


  15. why

    why Senior member

    Messages:
    9,735
    Likes Received:
    405
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2007
    Well that, and what about not having to toss the shit you want to buy behind your back hoping it lands behind you safety in your cart???

    Do you run along the aisles funneling foodstuffs into your cart? This isn't supermarket sweep. Were I to use one, I'd have no problem stopping my cart, picking up a bag of beans, and dropping it into my cart. I know, I know, it sounds like pretense, but trust me -- I'm really that skilled in real life.

    The rearward force problem isn't just applicable to shopping carts. Those scooter things at home improvement stores are possibly the grossest spawning of this inbred design.
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by