Dismiss Notice

STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

'iGent Myths Busted!'

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by VRaivio, Feb 9, 2013.

  1. Ivar

    Ivar Senior member

    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    139
    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Location:
    Stockholm
    

    Quite. I think "The Rules" should properly be viewed as a sort of sartorial "best practice".
     


  2. bertie

    bertie Senior member

    Messages:
    808
    Likes Received:
    146
    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Location:
    North of
    

    Part of what I think Sator is getting at is the rigidity of the iGent mentality via the internet. He cites historical examples of rules/rule breaking but in the name of poking fun at people who learn a little and then propogate this knowledge as rules blindly without a proper knowledge base.
     


  3. Lovelace

    Lovelace Senior member

    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    33
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2012
    

    Yes, but he himself is rigid in his denunciation.

    NJS was by far best contributor in that thread.
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2013


  4. bertie

    bertie Senior member

    Messages:
    808
    Likes Received:
    146
    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Location:
    North of
    I don't disagree - I just saw this thread driving towards a debate of whether rigid rules really exist and away from (at least part) of what Sator was getting at. If he was rigid or otherwsie clumsy it distracts from his overall thesis.

    There has been much discussion on this board recently about these rules being the starting point for all aspiring styeforumites so it seems to me a worthy debate as to how these rules actually arise and whether they are simply old wives tales (no offence to old wives) passed along without any really questioning as to their validity or historical acuracy or whether they have some real basis.
     


  5. Cantabrigian

    Cantabrigian Senior member

    Messages:
    4,741
    Likes Received:
    1,840
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2006
    Location:
    London
    

    Sator is definitely the sort of guy who is likely to be persuaded by that. I think you'll find it well worth the effort.
     


  6. Manton

    Manton RINO Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    41,574
    Likes Received:
    2,816
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2002
    Location:
    In Hiding
    
    pwned
     


  7. bourbonbasted

    bourbonbasted Cyber Eliitist

    Messages:
    4,035
    Likes Received:
    1,651
    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    

    I did the majority of my "research" or reading or whatever you'd like to call it well before I actually signed up for an account here. To be honest I think it's best to have some understanding of things before you attempt to "contribute." Though I know that is a dangerous idea. And, as you are no doubt aware, it's a dangerous assumption to correlate post counts or date of membership with insight. Though I did the majority of my learning here from much older threads of which I was not a part. Aside from a few threads or off-hand discussions, the vast majority of what gets discussed here now has already been covered. But, then again, that is the nature of the beast as new people take an interest and old people have new experiences.

    I really hang around now for insight into bespoke processes and to exchange PMs with more experienced members than myself. Anything outside of that generally falls into the category of snark or trying to inject some sense of reality into the conversation.

    EDIT: Likely more to your point/question, I very rarely post fit pics here because I don't need the validation. Half ignorance is bliss, half cyber eliitism.
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2013


  8. Cantabrigian

    Cantabrigian Senior member

    Messages:
    4,741
    Likes Received:
    1,840
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2006
    Location:
    London
    

    That devolves quickly into personal preference.

    I suppose you can criticize someone for a lack of internal consistency among their preferences but he can skirt that by making any norms sufficiently specific.

    Manton's philosophy, as I understand it, relies on a univesal aesthetic sense though one, quite obviously, not shared by all or even by all of the relevant audience.

    The implications follow much more clearly from that premise than they do from yours. Though, in the abstract, his premise is much harder to defend.
     


  9. Cantabrigian

    Cantabrigian Senior member

    Messages:
    4,741
    Likes Received:
    1,840
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2006
    Location:
    London
    

    Don't get me wrong, I'd like to read your rebuttal.

    I just don't want you to burn yourself out and then only post in CE for three months.
     


  10. mafoofan

    mafoofan THE FOO Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    20,889
    Likes Received:
    2,121
    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    Guys, I don't see what's so complicated. A good rule isn't necessarily one that's always been. So what if no one ever said "no charcoal odd trousers?" Somebody is saying that now, and giving you reasons for it. Use your brain and ask yourself if those reasons make sense. That's why Sator wound up wasting his time trying to crack these so-called "iGent myths." That they were pronounced by so-called "iGents" doesn't necessarily make them bad.

    One great thing about the internet is that communities like ours can now get together and exchange ideas. It wouldn't be surprising if we came up with some newly-distilled best practices together.
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2013


  11. bourbonbasted

    bourbonbasted Cyber Eliitist

    Messages:
    4,035
    Likes Received:
    1,651
    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    

    QFT
     


  12. mafoofan

    mafoofan THE FOO Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    20,889
    Likes Received:
    2,121
    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    

    I think you're trying to read two views as necessarily exclusive to each other, when they are not. My essential point is that "rules" have meaning and history, and we should contemplate them to determine how they should be applied (if at all), rather than merely mimmic what others have done before in a rote fashion. Nobody here, not even Manton, strictly adheres to every rule. Dressing is a thinking art. You don't dress well by simply following what's "correct" (AAAC) or dressing on impulsive whim (WAYWRN). You have to think about what you're doing.

    Believing in a universal aesthetic is only helpful if you attempt to derive guidance (aka "rules") from it. That leads you to the problem of distinguishing good rules from bad, which is what I was addressing. Separate issues.
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2013


  13. Geezer

    Geezer Senior member

    Messages:
    414
    Likes Received:
    60
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2009
    Location:
    London
    

    I completely agree with this. My issue with the way "rules" are sometimes presented is the claim that in the past they were societally enforced on a wide basis, when evidence is to the contrary.

    I am happy with the assertion that for decades exceptionally well-dressed men would never pair Thing X with Thing Y, nor ever contemplate wearing Thing Z. But that is often extended into an untenable claim that in the past no reasonably acceptably-dressed man would do so.
     


  14. Manton

    Manton RINO Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    41,574
    Likes Received:
    2,816
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2002
    Location:
    In Hiding
    
    I was banned from the CE!
     


  15. Lovelace

    Lovelace Senior member

    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    33
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2012
    

    There is always a degree of societal enforcement with clothes. You have to wear them in public or face arrest for example.

    Did you go to school in England, did you wear a uniform at school. Why do you think this was. What were they trying to achieve?
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by