• STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

I went to T&A to pick up some ties and noticed

brooklyn

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2005
Messages
150
Reaction score
3
I noticed that one of the salesman had what looked like to be buckles on the side of his pants. It reminded me of a tuxedo that I wore for my brothers wedding. It had adjustable tabs on the side which I thought was a great idea. What is everyones opinion on this? I mentioned this to my tailor and he thought it was not the best idea but why not. My weight does sway from pound to pound.
 

STYLESTUDENT

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2004
Messages
1,143
Reaction score
3
I have several pants that have the side buckles instead of belt loops. They're harder to adjust than a belt and your pants will slip more. I agree with your tailor.
 

j

(stands for Jerk)
Admin
Spamminator Moderator
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
14,912
Reaction score
105
My Paul Stuart suit has tabs with buttons on the sides in lieu of belt loops. I have seen this setup on some RL Polo suit pants as well. I like them, but they are not enough. With that suit I always wear suspenders.
 

Nonk

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2004
Messages
752
Reaction score
1
I too have trousers with side adjusters and no belt loops. I have only worn them with braces. I really like this combination.
 

brooklyn

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2005
Messages
150
Reaction score
3
Thanks for the information. Now it makes sense, probably not going to be on my next suit.
 

jester

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
186
Reaction score
0
It's also a frequent feature on English-style suits (both bespoke and those that attempt to convey this image). Some people like the side tabs for the image more than the function. In any case, you use braces with them, they don't replace the belt. Also, be sure that no one will think you're wearing polyester Sans-A-Belt slacks or something
 

kabert

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Messages
2,093
Reaction score
5
I've got several pairs of slacks with this feature too. But my favorite method of "side tab" is one on some Incotex slacks that have belt loops -- on each side there is a tab with two sets of buttons in order to tighten up the fit before the belt goes on. I think it's a great idea, as my weight seems to fluctuate too -- usually about 10 lbs higher in winter than in summer.
 

Manton

RINO
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
41,583
Reaction score
2,878
If the trousers fit very exactly in the waist, rise and crutch, and if the back is cut slightly higher (not like a fishmouth; more or less straight, but higher), then you can indeed wear the trousers without a belt or suspenders. I like this in summer, when I try to shed any superfluous accessories for the sake of "cool." It won't work if your waistline fluctuates to any significant degree.
 

Vintage Gent

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2003
Messages
2,748
Reaction score
31
For what it's worth, this is exactly what I specified for the trousers in the suit I commissioned from Chan--no belt loops, suspender buttons, side tabs.
 

Millerp

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
615
Reaction score
14
Many pants I have from the late fifties and early 60s have the side tabs only, or some kind of elastic ending in a tab. The practical effect was a sort of half-belting. I guess they were doing anything to throw off the suspenders of the previous fashion era.
This is true. It was called a Daks (sp) waist named after
the manufacturer who supposedly originated it. The pants had
flat fronts, an extension tab with a hidden metal hook clasp
(not with a visible button like today's better slacks) at the top of the fly and were tapered to about fourteen inch bottoms (no cuffs) that just barely touched the shoe. Some called this style "Continental". The suits the early Beatles wore had these
kinds of slacks - no belts and no suspenders.
 

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Featured Sponsor

Favorite Shorts Length

  • Above the knee

  • Knee length

  • Below the knee

  • None of the above

  • Mid-thigh ("short shorts")


Results are only viewable after voting.

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
461,520
Messages
10,014,377
Members
208,328
Latest member
PrinceOverseas
Top