Lord-Barrington
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2010
- Messages
- 2,801
- Reaction score
- 98
Bear in mind that "grades" is just a shorthand term for many things about one's transcript, and should not be simplified to raw GPA alone. "Transcript" is the more appropriate word, because it encompasses:
- GPA
- Areas of focus and subject matter of major
- Sufficiency of preparation in key areas (quant, finance, accounting, etc.)
- Degree of intellectual difficulty of program
* A 4.0 in art history won't be given preference over a 3.6 in a more quantitatively rigorous subject, for instance
* A transcript littered with guts and other GPA-boosters, especially at the expense of more rigorous material, will be a red flag
- Prestige and difficulty of the undergraduate institution itself
Because all of these things go into the mix, it's too simple and incorrect to say that GPA is GPA is GPA.
The depends what you're story is. If you did a political science degree because you were passionate about public policy, got a 3.9, went to work for government for a few years then transferred to business and now want to apply for an MBA, and you communicate that to adcoms, they're not automatically going to give the nod to some kid with a 3.2 in nuclear physics over you or ask you where all your quant classes are.
Adcoms care a lot more about seeing a realistic career trajectory/story in your SOP than they do about seeing that you took a bunch of finance/stats/quant classes.