1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

house or condo?

Discussion in 'Fine Living, Home, Design & Auto' started by Renault78law, May 24, 2006.

  1. Renault78law

    Renault78law Senior member

    Messages:
    2,141
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2003
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    I'm having a very difficult time trying to decide between a house and a condo. My parents and others are telling me that a house is a much wiser investment. The rub is that I can't afford a house in the neighborhood that I want to live. Further, the houses I've seen in neighborhoods that I can afford (even those that are outside of my pricerange!) have been atrociously disgusting. I really can't see myself living there.

    I'm single and 27 years old. I plan on living at my next residence for 5 years or so. Will probably move to the burbs after I get married and have a kid.

    On the one hand, I feel like I should live in the city while I can. I'm still young and single and have few responsibilities. I have the rest of my life to put up a picket fence in the burbs. On the other hand, I feel like I'm being superficial and foolish. A house is a wise investment, and you avoid high HOA ($350/month). Houses appreciate faster, or in the alternative, depreciate slower, than condos.

    I really can't decide what to do. Thoughts?
     
  2. retronotmetro

    retronotmetro Senior member

    Messages:
    1,645
    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Renault-

    This is a question with no easy answer, at least in this market. I generally agree with the conventional wisdom that single family homes are always the better investment. The problem is that in the LA area, single family home prices have reached a level where even a precipitous price drop would still leave single family home prices beyond the reach of a very large portion of the population. This leaves a lot of people with the only financially viable choice being condo vs. rental, unless they move way out into areas like Simi Valley, Palmdale/Lancaster, or *shudder* the 909.

    My advice to you now would be to save as much as you can until you reach a career point where you are working on something you can stick with, and you foresee a relatively stable income level from it. I have some friends who could walk away from their law firm jobs without any loans, and money in the bank. I have other friends who are stuck with mortgages and expenses that prevent them from switching jobs.

    I do think we are at the end of a market cycle now--houses are sitting on the market longer, and price reductions are much more common than they were a couple of years ago. Whether the next step is a price crash or a stagnation is anyone's guess, but I don't think prices will keep skyrocketing while you are looking.
     
  3. Dakota rube

    Dakota rube Senior member

    Messages:
    14,501
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Location:
    A bit better than yesterday, all day vomiting for
    Renault:
    You also need to take your desired lifestyle into consideration. If you're like most young men I've run across, the last thing you want to do on evenings or weekends is a bunch of lawn work or outside maintenance on a house. For that reason alone, the condo route might be a better choice. Look at the HOA as a cash payment for your time (lawn chores) and an actualized set-aside for upcoming maintenance items. Most homeowners do not save money each month to defray anticipated expenses and when the chickens come home to roost they are forced to take out a home equity loan or a short-term signature note. The condo forces you to allocate money each and every month for inevitable expense.
     
  4. Ambulance Chaser

    Ambulance Chaser Senior member

    Messages:
    9,790
    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2002
    Location:
    Washington, D.C.
    Good points all. The only thing I would add is that housing is unique in that it is both investment and consumption. It doesn't make sense to me to buy a house for the sole reason that it will experience greater appreciation than a condo if you hate it. If you look at the choice as condo vs. rental apartment rather than condo vs. house, the choice seems easy.
     
  5. Mr. Checks

    Mr. Checks Senior member

    Messages:
    1,279
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Location:
    Here
    Renault:
    You also need to take your desired lifestyle into consideration. If you're like most young men I've run across, the last thing you want to do on evenings or weekends is a bunch of lawn work or outside maintenance on a house. For that reason alone, the condo route might be a better choice. Look at the HOA as a cash payment for your time (lawn chores) and an actualized set-aside for upcoming maintenance items. Most homeowners do not save money each month to defray anticipated expenses and when the chickens come home to roost they are forced to take out a home equity loan or a short-term signature note. The condo forces you to allocate money each and every month for inevitable expense.


    I agree with the Rube. If you factor in your lifestyle choices, the condo seems the way to go.

    Although, I'd think that you ought not have any maintenance issues if you're only living there five years; any such immediate issues would likely be caught in your inspection and the price adjusted downward.
     
  6. Manic

    Manic Active Member

    Messages:
    40
    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Location:
    Winnipeg, Canada
    I'm a 29 year old, single, professional. I've done both the condo and the house thing.

    I'll tell you right now that if you have that, "I want to be in an urban area" feeling. You should do the condo thing.

    I lived in a downtown condo for a few years and loved it. But under pressure from my parents, I sold it and had a large house built for me, just outside the city. It was nice, but there was alot of work to be done and staying on top of the upkeep was too much for one person. It was made harder by the fact that I enjoy heading out to fine restaraunts and pubs in the evenings.

    After one year, I sold my house, found an apartment right in the "trendy" district, and now wait for a condo to open in this area.

    For me, it felt like the right choice. Sure I lost a hell of a great investment (but luckily I sold at the height of the market so I almost doubled my money). But in all I am so much happier living the urban lifestyle. I now live within to blocks of all of the city's best social offerings.

    Condo's in an urban area such as this, are just as good, if not better, investment wise as a large house in the burbs. Alot of people will pay anything to live here.

    My advice would be to get a condo someplace you love to be, and enjoy it. Instead of buying a house somewhere you only want to be until you can afford more.

    You are right though, you have the rest of your life to put up that white picket fence.
     
  7. itsstillmatt

    itsstillmatt Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    14,384
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Location:
    The wild and the pure.
    I agree with the Rube. If you factor in your lifestyle choices, the condo seems the way to go.

    Although, I'd think that you ought not have any maintenance issues if you're only living there five years; any such immediate issues would likely be caught in your inspection and the price adjusted downward.


    Remember that this is California and not the midwest. Houses and condos here are not as waterproof as they are in other parts of the country, and maintenance issues pop up all of the time. There is a trade off between waterproofing and earthquakeproofing, and here we are more worried about tremblors.
     
  8. esquire.

    esquire. Senior member

    Messages:
    1,303
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2004
    My parents and others are telling me that a house is a much wiser investment.

    I may be muddling things up in my mind, but I thought I remembered that in some markets, condos have actually had a higher appreciation rate than houses. Your parents are probably correct that it would be better to buy a house vs. a condo for an investment over a long period of time, but it doesn't sound like you're planning on staying there too long.

    Nor, would I necessairly rule out renting if you're not planning on staying in your area too long. The NYTimes had an interesting analysis on the benefits of home ownership vs. renting, and their conclusion on which was better depended on the particular market.

    One thing to remember when you check out the condo is to investigate the HOA. When people buy condos, they never pay attention to the HOA and that's one of their biggest mistakes. The HOA upkeep and management will help determine how much you end up enjoying living there. The manager at my condo was a micromanaging, wannabe McDonald's manager. I would get these ridiculous notices in the mail, informing me that I must take down some hanging plants off my patio or else I would be fined. I ended up showing the manager all the neighboring condos that also had hanging plants on their patios, how the rulebook of the HOA allowed hanging plants, etc... The managers reply was that I would then need to sign up for a separate condo association meeting a month later to discuss this issuse. Sometimes, I would get other notices and the manager would even deny sending them.

    Plus, you want a compotent management that is responsible for the condo's upkeep. The balcony had signifigant termite damage and needed to be fixed. Even though this fell under the association's responsibility, they declined to fix it. You're going to pay hundreds of dollars in fees for instances like this, and not every association will be as vigilant as it should be with its duties.
     
  9. acidboy

    acidboy Senior member

    Messages:
    21,170
    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    if you need to have a garden, buy a house. otherwise a condo is good. [​IMG]
     
  10. johnapril

    johnapril Senior member

    Messages:
    5,663
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Hell is other people.
     
  11. LabelKing

    LabelKing Senior member

    Messages:
    25,745
    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Location:
    Constantinople
    Acting is happy agony.
     
  12. Will

    Will Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    3,144
    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Location:
    San Francisco
    The only negative in my experience with condos is that they can be less liquid than houses in a downturn. But if you're planning to live in it for at least five years that will take you well past a normal downturn, if that's what's going on now.
     
  13. drizzt3117

    drizzt3117 Senior member

    Messages:
    13,141
    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    I'd go condo personally.

    Although I'm certainly glad I purchased a house (esp in Orange County, four years ago) sometimes I think the ease of a condo would be better, and if you're talking about LA and not talking about purchasing something new... I would definitely recommend condo.
     
  14. Ivan Kipling

    Ivan Kipling Senior member

    Messages:
    2,114
    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Totally agree with you, about new construction's lack of appeal. Many, many of the new homes in which my friends and relatives reside, are hideous. I don't care what they cost . . . I wouldn't have them, if you gave them to me. They're hippodromes. Not houses.

    As for homes being a solid investment, you never know. All depends on where you are. I endured the sixties urban revolution; my hometown went to pot, overnight. We left a beautiful house, were paid less than its brick and stone were worth, and ran to the suburbs.

    I think you're a little young, for a house. I've lived in them, all my life . . . they are a LOT of work. Help is not easy to find. Lawns and landscaping are expensive, to maintain. There's always something, that needs attention. I'd consider a condo, at this point . . . you may not want to marry until later than you think. If you change your mind, you can always househunt, when the need arises.
     
  15. esquire.

    esquire. Senior member

    Messages:
    1,303
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2004
    [COLOR="DimGray"they are a LOT of work. Help is not easy to find. Lawns and landscaping are expensive, to maintain. There's always something, that needs attention.

    I don't see why the lawns and landscaping would be that expensive to maintain, especially if he's not buying a new home without any landscaping.

    You could mow the lawn yourself a couple times a month, pay some neighborhood kid to do it, or as Kent Wang has suggested, use a illegal immigrant to mow your lawn for less than fifty dollars a month.

    To me, it would still be cheaper than the hundreds of dollars you'd be paying to the HOA each month.
     
  16. otterhound

    otterhound Senior member

    Messages:
    199
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    There is no shame in continuing to rent. Houses are at all time highs, so there is no guaranty of substantial continued appreciation.

    You are only 27. Buy real estate because you want to, not because you think you should.
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by