Thin White Duke
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2010
- Messages
- 5,345
- Reaction score
- 7,816
Yeah and cool $600 shades - that’s “ballin’” as the kids these days say!Your pimp-hand is strong in that photo.
Great suit...
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Yeah and cool $600 shades - that’s “ballin’” as the kids these days say!Your pimp-hand is strong in that photo.
Great suit...
First time i notice your vampire teeth, you creature of the night !Sorry, no robopose, no multiple pics, just happy it’s not raining.
View attachment 1397961
The only thing I have pimp-level control over is the camera, and even then...not so often.Your pimp-hand is strong in that photo.
Great suit...
Unfortunately on the night of its debut it got a couple negroni stains on it from Harry’s Bar in Florence. Which, now that I think about it, is OK.Such a great suit and pairing. Hopefully it will stay quarantine clean.
I’m not going to lie, Jacques Marie Mage frames are ridiculously expensive. That said, I’m smitten and and am eyeing another pair, specifically the Enzo.Yeah and cool $600 shades - that’s “ballin’” as the kids these days say!
They’re pretty rugged, mostly due to eating expensive sunglasses after having no money left for food.First time i notice your vampire teeth, you creature of the night !
@heldentenor Thank you for the feedback; I need it. Chucked the square for a subsequent photo...@khughes44 I love that fit except for the square. It's a bit loud in an otherwise toned-down look.
You know I’m a shades junky UC, with a rotation hovering around thirty pairs. I saw those JMM ones a while back and was tempted. They seem like great quality with really chunky acetate but I balked at the price. Now you’ve put them back on my radar but I think I’d have to see a better deal before I pulled the trigger. Also shades, like hats, are very difficult to order without trying on as they may look great in a pic but crap when they’re on your face so I’d definitely want to try them on before buying. A milimetre or two difference in width can be a huge difference in how they look. Any idea where I can try them in the lower 48?The only thing I have pimp-level control over is the camera, and even then...not so often.
Unfortunately on the night of its debut it got a couple negroni stains on it from Harry’s Bar in Florence. Which, now that I think about it, is OK.
I’m not going to lie, Jacques Marie Mage frames are ridiculously expensive. That said, I’m smitten and and am eyeing another pair, specifically the Enzo.
They’re pretty rugged, mostly due to eating expensive sunglasses after having no money left for food.
You know I’m a shades junky UC, with a rotation hovering around thirty pairs. I saw those JMM ones a while back and was tempted. They seem like great quality with really chunky acetate but I balked at the price. Now you’ve put them back on my radar but I think I’d have to see a better deal before I pulled the trigger. Also shades, like hats, are very difficult to order without trying on as they may look great in a pic but crap when they’re on your face so I’d definitely want to try them on before buying. A milimetre or two difference in width can be a huge difference in how they look. Any idea where I can try them in the lower 48?
I’m also intrigued by the Curry and Paxton Michael Caines but they’re 56mm which would be wider than any pair I own so again want to try them on before buying. Tired of paying return fees on ill fitting gear!
The kent wang ones are all you need. Good price, longtime sf supporter well made and look good in any situationThere was a discussion recently in another thread (maybe the Random Fashion Advice/Thoughts one) about those JMM sunglasses. Seems the consensus is they can be difficult to pull off without looking like a douche (although @UrbanComposition certainly wears them well), and trying them on before purchase is essential.
For me, I treat sunglasses roughly and have a tendency to lose them on boats, at the beach, leave them behind in hotel rooms, etc., so I rarely spend more than $50 on a pair nowadays.
@heldentenor Thank you for the feedback; I need it. Chucked the square for a subsequent photo... View attachment 1398314
The kent wang ones are all you need. Good price, longtime sf supporter well made and look good in any situation