HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III

[FillW]

Anyone know what happened to the forum member "Lufvier"? He stopped posting last October.

 

[FillW]

The exact moment I lost respect for Spoo was when he started referring to his pocket square as a 'pochette' and listing his cologne. I think something inside me died that day!

He makes them look good, though. I didn't think they could until I saw him wearing one. You just don't have the "points" option when you wear them.

x-post from the Friday Challenge:

Good looking fit but looks a wee bit tight around the button.

 

[in stitches]



church

had you said "shul," that would have made your point far more convincing for me.

 

[Orgetorix]



 Anyone know what happened to the forum member "Lufvier"? He stopped posting last October.

I think he just said he was getting busy with his job and bored with posting the same fits over and over, so he was expecting to go dark at least for a while.

Good looking fit but looks a wee bit tight around the button.

Thanks. If so, it's because of the sweater.

 

[upr_crust]



+1
--
seamaster, anden, crusty and TTO, great looking fits, gents.

Thank you, boychik, and back at ya.

This is a lovely colour-palette on you but the matching pocket square is bringing things down today

I disagree with this. I think it's generally accepted that completely matching solid tie and pocket squares is a bit of a men's Wearhouse noob move, but I don't see a problem with dominant colours being reflected in each. Somewhere a rule has evolved where the pocket square at most is supposed to 'pick up' a colour from the tie or shirt and nothing more. Why? Foo mentioned something about there being two points of focus for the eye - the tie and the pocket square - so why is this a crime? Is it too much for the human brain to digest?

Truth is that the orange pocket square was picked with the Friday Challenge in mind, and the team colors being displayed are blue and orange. When I decided to wear the pocket square in question, I was fully aware that it was "matchy-matchy", but didn't think that it looked bad, as such, and I've been trying to think of an occasion on which to wear today's pocket square (pochette, silk snot rag, whatever . . .). Let the chips (and the opinions) fall where they may . . .

 

[in stitches]

thanks, crusty!

 

[Fine Young Gentleman]

From two nights ago, finally got the photos edited. An alternative take on black tie.

 

[mimo]

(It's not going to be me...)

 

[CaymanS]



 Anyone know what happened to the forum member "Lufvier"? He stopped posting last October.

He's a lawyer. My guess is that he finally got busy!

 

[Cantabrigian]



had you said "shul," that would have made your point far more convincing for me.

Well played, stitchy. Well played.

But srsly, you won't see the next level until you PS up.

 

[Cantabrigian]



Spoiler: I don't want to see that ever again

From two nights ago, finally got the photos edited.

You should have kept editing.

 

[AdamP77]

Shoulders distract from an otherwise beautiful suit...

 

[RDiaz]

Sweet Jesus.

 

[FillW]

He's a lawyer. My guess is that he finally got busy!

There's way more than enough work for a Philly lawyer...


that place has more courtrooms than any city I've ever seen. But than again I haven't looked at too many. lol

 

[in stitches]



Well played, stitchy. Well played.
But srsly, you won't see the next level until you PS up.

maybe i already am next level and PSs will only take me down.

also, tbh, if i were to jump into that, everything would be downhill for a while. there would be much fail and im not ready for that yet, especially after i think things are finally headed in a good direction. maybe in a few more years.