Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by Mr.K, Mar 25, 2011.
That coat is total win.
thanks alex. the trou are a tad long, i need to take them BACK to the tailor
the jacket, you are the 3rd to say that, maybe it is indeed too long no fixing that really. i like the tie harumph. and the gray is lighter than the pic shows, the spoiler pic is closer to reality.
i need a PS, there are no pocket flaps dude.
thank you very much sir.
presumably, i do prefer a 3/2 or a 2, but this is what is. it also hides some of my fattiness.
we can only hope. start with posting a fit pic dood.
@ willin - shoes are G&G westmisnster, in vintage oak on the MH71 last.
Slightly larger lapel as well.
Glad to see we're back to posting pics again.
... expecting some dislike for the blue suede shoes.
Super amazing coat. Great find.
Really? I hate the coat. Way too much going on between the style and the pattern. The buttonholes really bother me too.
really? i feel weird in big lapels.
me too! and you look great man, no hate from me. the shoes are awesome, especially with that combo.
Just got back from Chicago, here is the shoes I wore. It isn't much in terms of fit but rather an attempt of contribution to bring this thread back on topic:
Spoiler: Warning: Spoiler!
It's not super nice nor very dressy, but functional with a whimsy to it. Buttonholes- schmuttonholes, it's a raincoat.
Not big, just bigger than those. Maybe 3.5"?
This may be true in the US. I'm a lawyer, and I think that's a relatively accurate definition for local laws. However, a quick Google search found this for the definition of "making" as it relates to Canadian law:
So, while maybe he didn't have "contact" with the children, if this definition sticks, he was very involved.
honestly, i never measured my lapels. ill have to do that, if only out of curiosity.
Every man at some point measures his lapel.
Separate names with a comma.