1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by Mr.K, Mar 25, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. upr_crust

    upr_crust Senior member

    Messages:
    5,141
    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Location:
    NYC, NY
    

    As someone who wears hats with some regularity, and someone with a sizeable cranium (hat size 7 1/2 - 7 5/8, or 60/61 European), I don't think that hats either reduce the appearance of size of one's noggin, nor do they increase it, in my experience. Apart from the insulating qualities of a hat (an essential for a bald man in a NYC winter), hats (at least fedoras) act to frame one's face. I will tell you that hats (at least fedoras - and not the stingy-brim variety, which I could never wear, as they're ideal for long faces with small skulls - very much not me) give one visual "presence" - the frame of a hat's brim emphasizes the face underneath it.

    As for the practice of a man wearing a hat indoors - that's the ill-conceived habit of hipster children. The only time that I practice that faux pas is in a crowded lunch venue where the only safe place for the hat is on my head.
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2012
    1 person likes this.
  2. the shah

    the shah Senior member

    Messages:
    16,543
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2008
    Location:
    lying furtively
    

    is this in regard to more formal hats ? if they undo the effect of large poofy hair then the head will appear again smaller, but that may not be an issue for me anymore since i've shaved it all off :eek:
    but what about caps (like my brimless damir chapeau), or less formal headwear ? i've also wrapped/draped scarves around my head. and i've worn the same item gdl has used as his pocket square on my head.
     
  3. Mr. Moo

    Mr. Moo Senior member

    Messages:
    17,227
    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Location:
    Bay Area, CA
    Shah, more magic carpet, less terrible mall brand outfits. Thx.

    I guess it's a lose/lose when you think about it. :confused:
     
  4. gdl203

    gdl203 Senior member Dubiously Honored Affiliate Vendor

    Messages:
    36,650
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2005
    Location:
    New York
    A pile-on is not necessarily characterized by the height of the pile but by the dynamics of several posters posting consecutive negative posts, generally hammering the same point (a.k.a. the :deadhorse: effect). Which is what happened here until people were interrupted by that Indochino fit. One of the issue on MC is often a complete miss of the forest for the trees - people focus on details without stepping back and looking a how things look as a whole. That outfit was pretty damn boring but the overall goal was for a relaxed, almost young university faculty look. I.e. NOT the incotex + fitted shirt + tv-fold square that's favored here. It's not the same silhouette that's targeted. These pants were really not that bad in the context of the outfit. They don't stand out as anything fantastic but they are totally fine with this outfit. Put him in slim tapered incotex and the result would be completely different than what he's aiming for. Now, I don't think it's a coincidence that the locals jumped at his throat - there's still a good amount of resentment (butthurtitude in moo speak) towards shah and some of the SWD crowd for some of the things that happened over the last few weeks.

    Anyhow, back to celebrating high-frequency posters who promote mediocrity and lack taste, but are buddies after all.
     
    2 people like this.
  5. patrickBOOTH

    patrickBOOTH Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    33,333
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Location:
    New York City
    
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2012
  6. Mr. Moo

    Mr. Moo Senior member

    Messages:
    17,227
    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Location:
    Bay Area, CA
    I thought it was charming when shah posted the same pants on a model so that we can see what they're supposed to look like when worn correctly and "in context" (in gdl-speak).
     
  7. in stitches

    in stitches Senior member Moderator

    Messages:
    68,895
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Location:
    Charm City
    added to styfo glossary

    pile on [pahyl awn] :



    :plain:
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2012
  8. upr_crust

    upr_crust Senior member

    Messages:
    5,141
    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Location:
    NYC, NY
    

    My comments were in the context of more formal hats, and large poofy hair was last a detail of my life in the 1970's (sometime prior to your birth), so it was not even on my mental radar screen.

    For weekend wear, I have any number of caps - flat caps and baseball caps, depending on the level of informality, but, crotchety old stickler that I am, I generally remove said headgear from my head while indoors (and not wearing outerwear).

    I would not dare to wrap a scarf around my head - some might look like Douglas Fairbanks in "The Thief of Baghdad", but I would look more like someone's Aunt Minnie from Dubuque. :embar:
     
    1 person likes this.
  9. acecow

    acecow Senior member

    Messages:
    4,135
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Location:
    Not Manhattan, unfortunately
    

    Sigh, I should go back 5 pages and copy all the real comments, which were mostly to the tune of "the pants aren't good, but overall it's not bad". Hardly a pile-up. Unfortunately, I don't care enough for you, your biased opinions and this whole discussion in general.

    I will discuss the one thing that I do care about, though. The fit of those pants. Incotex-slim and good fit aren't synonyms in SF, you should know that. You have a good eye for clothes. Shah's pants fit bad for a loose, relaxed fit. They were folding and creasing in all the wrong places, the hem lay sloppily on the shoes and the silhouette they produced was far from flattering. It had nothing to do with how slim they were. If you're going to praise him for dressing in a sloppy university faculty look, then I don't understand what you're doing on this forum. What's next? Praising white socks with dress pants just because the guy went for a relaxed american look?
     
  10. gdl203

    gdl203 Senior member Dubiously Honored Affiliate Vendor

    Messages:
    36,650
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2005
    Location:
    New York
    Once again, you show that you simply cannot fathom that some people are aiming for a different aesthetic than yours. Time and time again, you prove this. You are using a different tone here than the pathetic insults you threw around in SWD WAYWT but the end conclusion is the same IMO.

    I think you're wrong on the pants fit and I'll leave it at that -I can't imagine we could possibly have a constructive conversation about this given your narrow approach to what can look good.
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2012
  11. acecow

    acecow Senior member

    Messages:
    4,135
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Location:
    Not Manhattan, unfortunately
    I figured the opinion on his fit was pretty uniform here, but I may be wrong.
     
  12. Mr. Moo

    Mr. Moo Senior member

    Messages:
    17,227
    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Location:
    Bay Area, CA
    gdl is open minded. :confused:
     
  13. acecow

    acecow Senior member

    Messages:
    4,135
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Location:
    Not Manhattan, unfortunately
    

    Not when it comes to shiny ties worn to Magic Castle. I suppose that context magically doesn't matter there anymore. :confused:
     
  14. gdl203

    gdl203 Senior member Dubiously Honored Affiliate Vendor

    Messages:
    36,650
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2005
    Location:
    New York
    wow you guys are fucking dense.

    Have a good weekend
     
  15. acecow

    acecow Senior member

    Messages:
    4,135
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Location:
    Not Manhattan, unfortunately
    

    I'd love to, but it's Thursday afternoon.
     
  16. Dionysus

    Dionysus Member

    Messages:
    14
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    Location:
    Udine, Italy
    First post on WAYWRN!
    I've been a long time lurker, and i finally decided to post some fits; be kind, gentlemen!
    I think I learned a lot in my time as a guest on this forum, and naturally criticism is welcome. Took this photos last night at the hotel, after a school trip in Rome:
    rocked some purple details at the parliament.
    Pocket square fold is inspired by Upr_crust, no copyright infringement intended [​IMG] perhaps tie and PS are a bit too matchy, but I realised that too late...

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]

    (By the way, sorry for my english)
     
    1 person likes this.
  17. the shah

    the shah Senior member

    Messages:
    16,543
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2008
    Location:
    lying furtively
    gdl why do you bother nothing good comes from discussing with farm animals :laugh:


    i'm 64, fyi, but i do agree that such head attire should be removed indoors in most situations, and that includes wrapped scarves (at least off the head and adorning the shoulders then)
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2012
  18. acecow

    acecow Senior member

    Messages:
    4,135
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Location:
    Not Manhattan, unfortunately
    

    You are a true gentleman befitting your elegant wardrobe.
     
  19. add911_11

    add911_11 Senior member

    Messages:
    2,995
    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2010
    

    Very Mark Cho
     
  20. XKxRome0ox

    XKxRome0ox Senior member

    Messages:
    1,632
    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2010
    Location:
    Los Angeles
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by