rathebaindc
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- Messages
- 477
- Reaction score
- 23
I don't know much about Hilditch & Key shirts. What is their level of quality? What can they be compared to, and where do they fit on the totem pole of shirtings?
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Quality has dipped a bit in recent years, IMO. I'd rank their work a bit below that of Harvie & Hudson, and well below that of Turnbull & Asser and others in that tier.
Seriously??
Quality has dipped a bit in recent years, IMO. I'd rank their work a bit below that of Harvie & Hudson, and well below that of Turnbull & Asser and others in that tier.
Seriously??
For the record, H&H buttons are also MOP, though they are admittedly quite thin. That's always bugged me about their shirts, but it's a stylistic choice on their part and not a construction choice. I wouldn't describe their buttons as "lower quality." I'd just describe them as thinner.
Thanks for the input; I've been satisfied with H&H shirts so far, but now I want to 'branch out' into higher-end English RTW shirts (thinking of Budd, H&K, N&L, T&A...) Perhaps I ought to cross H&K off my list.
For the record, H&H buttons are also MOP, though they are admittedly quite thin. That's always bugged me about their shirts, but it's a stylistic choice on their part and not a construction choice. I wouldn't describe their buttons as "lower quality." I'd just describe them as thinner.