- Joined
- Nov 15, 2011
- Messages
- 5,127
- Reaction score
- 13,921
I've been seeing a ton of comparison questions about these two heavy hitters of the tylorean mountain garb: the Heschung Thuya (sold most famously at NMWA and since discontinued) and the Paraboot Michael (sold everywhere that wants a shoe account).
I am posting my take of them below, and opening up the thread for other folks to give their opinions.
SIZING
I'm a 10.5D brannock, low instep. I have thuyas in 9 and Michaels in 44, length-wise they are almost identical, with maybe an extra millimeter on the Michaels. I would say that I have all the other traditional hallmarks for sizing - 10D van/barrie, 10.5 Aberdeen, 11 or 11.5 in sneakers.
Volume-wise, thuyas are gigantic (but that's cuz I have flat feet too probly). Thuya lacing basically overlaps on me, while Michaels have about a centimeter gap in between the two. You can see in the photos just how beefy that heschung sole is in comparison with the Paraboot.
LEATHER & CONSTRUCTION
Leather is definitely a lot better and heftier on the thuyas. Paraboot aren't bad, but like, heschung is on a different level. Construction is def better on the thuyas, but it's not as massive of a gap as leather quality. Paraboot also had more leather panels, and while don't necessarily cut any corners, they just don't feel as sturdy as the Heschung.
SOLE
For me, the paraboot sole is better for city walking, while the thuyas have taken me through some wild winters without a problem. Because of the sole on the thuya, the rubber sole is stitched on, whereas the Michaels are glued (I think this is correct?).
STYLING
thuyas are definitely a beefy country shoe, Michaels are available in hair-on and mismatched styles which are dope, so that's on you.
PHOTOS
I am posting my take of them below, and opening up the thread for other folks to give their opinions.
SIZING
I'm a 10.5D brannock, low instep. I have thuyas in 9 and Michaels in 44, length-wise they are almost identical, with maybe an extra millimeter on the Michaels. I would say that I have all the other traditional hallmarks for sizing - 10D van/barrie, 10.5 Aberdeen, 11 or 11.5 in sneakers.
Volume-wise, thuyas are gigantic (but that's cuz I have flat feet too probly). Thuya lacing basically overlaps on me, while Michaels have about a centimeter gap in between the two. You can see in the photos just how beefy that heschung sole is in comparison with the Paraboot.
LEATHER & CONSTRUCTION
Leather is definitely a lot better and heftier on the thuyas. Paraboot aren't bad, but like, heschung is on a different level. Construction is def better on the thuyas, but it's not as massive of a gap as leather quality. Paraboot also had more leather panels, and while don't necessarily cut any corners, they just don't feel as sturdy as the Heschung.
SOLE
For me, the paraboot sole is better for city walking, while the thuyas have taken me through some wild winters without a problem. Because of the sole on the thuya, the rubber sole is stitched on, whereas the Michaels are glued (I think this is correct?).
STYLING
thuyas are definitely a beefy country shoe, Michaels are available in hair-on and mismatched styles which are dope, so that's on you.
PHOTOS
Last edited: