cerneabbas
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2013
- Messages
- 2,670
- Reaction score
- 2,015
Wrong forum
Last edited:
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Dope !View attachment 1459516
First outing for my Loake longwings with Navy P.o.W trousers.
I will assume that is a modern compliment.Dope !
I will Keep you updated Old boy.I will assume that is a modern compliment.
They look the more upmarket than Royals . Nice colour. Do they have the little join on the inside? (We may have discussed this before.
The join doesnt bother me either on my Loake Royals.They are Loake 1880 Legacy...I am guessing this is a bit higher quality than the 1880 range,the leather is better than the Royals.
I like the colour (Conker) and the shape....
Yes the join is there,tbh the join never bothered me,it would if it was on the outer side of the shoe but on the inside its not really noticeable when the shoes being worn.
I was looking for something similar in a wide fitting and then a Barker marketing email turned up with their Portrush in an H fit. Not sure about the Barkerflex soles though. https://www.barkershoes.com/products/portrush-walnut-calf?variant=18516154351714View attachment 1459516
First outing for my Loake longwings with Navy P.o.W trousers.
Thank you gentlemen for the appreciation.
@Clouseau , yes, they are in chromexcel.
It's the first time I own shoes in that material and I'm aware that it's more rugged than calf and does not take a great shine. Yet, the shoes were on sale on Cheaney's site and the price was too good to pass.
Any hint about mainteinance?