Jumbie
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2007
- Messages
- 4,051
- Reaction score
- 5
I think finger size is a large determinate of how a ring looks... a huge ring on a tiny girl looks a little too 'nichole ritchie' to me..
There are many things that can be done with the setting and the ring pairing that makes diamond rings more intersting than a massive rock, imo...
Finally someone made this point. A friend of mine just got engaged. She has a size 4 finger and the ring looked like it was over two carats to me. I didn't ask her how many carats it was because that's in poor taste IMO but she told someone it was 1.56.
It suited her finger in my opinion. I'm likely going to get engaged at some point in the next year and I've been keeping an eye out for ring ideas. I see so many women walking around with gigantic rocks on their fingers that look absolutely horrible and off-balance to me. I'm going for quality and style/design over size (my g/f agrees) but unfortunately, for many women, it appears that size is the main factor. That's a shame.