Hazing in Greek Life

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by Another New Yorker, May 12, 2011.

  1. Another New Yorker

    Another New Yorker Senior member

    Messages:
    551
    Likes Received:
    6
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2009
    I had a discussion today with a bunch of people I went to high school with today, and those damn New Yorkers launched into their usual criticism of Greek Life. In this case the target of their condemnations was hazing during pledgeship.

    This issue has plagued fraternities across the country for a few decades, indeed many states even passed laws regarding this. I am addressing this question more so to those who have been through the system though. Given the number of successful Americans on SF, I'm sure more than a fair share of you have been through pledgeship and partook in the lineups. Do you guys think this process is productive? The fire that tempers iron through steel? A valuable tradition? Or do you think it is dangerous and unnecessary.

    I am personally a college freshman who barely scraped through a Southern pledgeship and turned my rage towards the spring pledges, and my stance is, honestly it made me much closer with my brothers and there is no long term resent between me and the upper classmen. Everything dangerous was done in a controlled atmosphere, and my brothers are smart, which may not always be the case. I support the process, at least as it is implemented where I go to school (pledged and paddled in the South, so I can't imagine any other area is worse).

    Anyone else have any opinion on this? Balanced men Sig Eps need not apply.
     
  2. ter1413

    ter1413 Senior member

    Messages:
    18,093
    Likes Received:
    1,882
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Location:
    Central Booking
    stupid.
     
  3. MrG

    MrG Senior member

    Messages:
    12,182
    Likes Received:
    4,338
    Joined:
    May 25, 2008
    Location:
    The Medicine Spring
    stupid.

    This. I don't care how "controlled" it is, a bunch of college kids doing dangerous stuff to each other is profoundly idiotic.
     
  4. JLibourel

    JLibourel Senior member

    Messages:
    8,608
    Likes Received:
    397
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    My stepson was involved for years in re-activating a chapter of Kappa Sigma that had been suspended for hazing. I believe the "nationals" of most fraternities are death on hazing these days. He sure never mentioned anything of that sort to me, and knowing him as I do, I don't think he would have tolerated being the recipient of any kind of hazing.
     
  5. in stitches

    in stitches Kung Joo Moderator

    Messages:
    68,895
    Likes Received:
    31,016
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Location:
    Charm City
    This. I don't care how "controlled" it is, a bunch of college kids doing dangerous stuff to each other is profoundly idiotic.

    I could not agree more. The idea of controlled is to remove danger, not find the extinguisher after your brahs entire body is on fire. I understand the idea of "bullying" forming comraderie, look at this forum. But the stuff you speak of is as MrG said, profoundly idiotic.
     
  6. NAMOR

    NAMOR Senior member

    Messages:
    20,575
    Likes Received:
    3,438
    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2010
    Location:
    Heavenly & Northstar
    most of the frats still do it. no one will admit it openly though
     
  7. Another New Yorker

    Another New Yorker Senior member

    Messages:
    551
    Likes Received:
    6
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2009
    This. I don't care how "controlled" it is, a bunch of college kids doing dangerous stuff to each other is profoundly idiotic.

    The forced drinking is probably the only dangerous aspect of it as far as I can see (and where all deaths result from), but honestly, it isn't much more intense than a particularly wild night. If it's binge drinking, then idiots are gonna go beyond reasonable limits regardless of the context, at least in this case there's someone there to call 911. I know more than a few guys who thought bonging Jack Daniels was a good idea well outside of pledgeship.

    Another example of what happened to a friend is 30 guys were locked in a room with 6 kegs and had to finish it in a night. They realized the only effective way of doing this was to periodically throw up. They'd through up every 15 beers (consumed approximately in 2 hours), and take a break and resume. Nasty as fuck but not dangerous.

    Also much of the hazing prosecuted isn't even dangerous. Making pledges do 10 mile runs, waking them up at 6 AM for PT, or making them clean people's rooms or drive girls.. Dress codes and sleeping on roofs. The latter all fall under hazing by law, and personally I think it's ridiculous. Honestly, how could making a guy stand on the quad 8 hours a day making PB&J's be dangerous. Or making someone follow you carrying an umbrella. Humiliating yes, but totally voluntary, and people can back out whenever
     
  8. ter1413

    ter1413 Senior member

    Messages:
    18,093
    Likes Received:
    1,882
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Location:
    Central Booking
    The forced drinking is probably the only dangerous aspect of it as far as I can see (and where all deaths result from), but honestly, it isn't much more intense than a particularly wild night. If it's binge drinking, then idiots are gonna go beyond reasonable limits regardless of the context, at least in this case there's someone there to call 911. I know more than a few guys who thought bonging Jack Daniels was a good idea well outside of pledgeship.

    Another example of what happened to a friend is 30 guys were locked in a room with 6 kegs and had to finish it in a night. They realized the only effective way of doing this was to periodically throw up. They'd through up every 15 beers (consumed approximately in 2 hours), and take a break and resume. Nasty as fuck but not dangerous.

    Also much of the hazing prosecuted isn't even dangerous. Making pledges do 10 mile runs, waking them up at 6 AM for PT, or making them clean people's rooms or drive girls.. Dress codes and sleeping on roofs. The latter all fall under hazing by law, and personally I think it's ridiculous. Honestly, how could making a guy stand on the quad 8 hours a day making PB&J's be dangerous. Or making someone follow you carrying an umbrella. Humiliating yes, but totally voluntary, and people can back out whenever



    all still very stupid
     
  9. Another New Yorker

    Another New Yorker Senior member

    Messages:
    551
    Likes Received:
    6
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2009
    all still very stupid

    Dude you're doing a great job justifying yourself. Also since when was stupidity illegal.
     
  10. gort

    gort Senior member

    Messages:
    3,858
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2010
    You think it's not dangerous to drink that much beer just because you poke n' choke periodically?
     
  11. CJones

    CJones Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    74
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Dangerous? Not always.
    Dumb? Always.
    Cool? No.
     
  12. JChance

    JChance Senior member

    Messages:
    992
    Likes Received:
    39
    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA, US
    I agree. It's one of those 'dont ask dont tell' thing. I myself was a Sigma Nu and it was not that bad. It gives one a chance to bond with their "brothers" through hardship...

    most of the frats still do it. no one will admit it openly though
     
  13. Another New Yorker

    Another New Yorker Senior member

    Messages:
    551
    Likes Received:
    6
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2009
    You think it's not dangerous to drink that much beer just because you poke n' choke periodically?

    Much less dangerous. Probably much less dangerous than taking 18-19 shots in an hour at a party because your best friend dared you.

    Also 50 beers over 12 hours isn't really that heavy of a consumption rate (I mean it's heavy, but on the danger level, it's pretty low).
     
  14. NAMOR

    NAMOR Senior member

    Messages:
    20,575
    Likes Received:
    3,438
    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2010
    Location:
    Heavenly & Northstar
    I agree. It's one of those 'dont ask dont tell' thing. I myself was a Sigma Nu and it was not that bad. It gives one a chance to bond with their "brothers" through hardship...
    and it does. we didnt have to do anything redicoulous like split 6 kegs among 30 people but the things we had to do did cause "excessive hardship." with that said, i wouldnt change a thing.
     
  15. MrG

    MrG Senior member

    Messages:
    12,182
    Likes Received:
    4,338
    Joined:
    May 25, 2008
    Location:
    The Medicine Spring
    The forced drinking is probably the only dangerous aspect of it as far as I can see (and where all deaths result from), but honestly, it isn't much more intense than a particularly wild night. If it's binge drinking, then idiots are gonna go beyond reasonable limits regardless of the context, at least in this case there's someone there to call 911. I know more than a few guys who thought bonging Jack Daniels was a good idea well outside of pledgeship.

    Another example of what happened to a friend is 30 guys were locked in a room with 6 kegs and had to finish it in a night. They realized the only effective way of doing this was to periodically throw up. They'd through up every 15 beers (consumed approximately in 2 hours), and take a break and resume. Nasty as fuck but not dangerous.

    Also much of the hazing prosecuted isn't even dangerous. Making pledges do 10 mile runs, waking them up at 6 AM for PT, or making them clean people's rooms or drive girls.. Dress codes and sleeping on roofs. The latter all fall under hazing by law, and personally I think it's ridiculous. Honestly, how could making a guy stand on the quad 8 hours a day making PB&J's be dangerous. Or making someone follow you carrying an umbrella. Humiliating yes, but totally voluntary, and people can back out whenever


    Dude. You seem like a nice enough guy, but did you read this before you hit "submit reply?" I know you're young, but really? This seemed reasonable?

    Let's take a look at the keg thing. There are approximately 15 gallons in a keg, 128 ounces in a gallon, and 12 ounces in a beer.

    That means there are 960 bottles of beer in six kegs - (15*128*6)/12 for those of you following along at home. Now, there are 30 guys in the room, which means each of those guys had to drink 32 beers to kill those kegs. I've been drinking for longer than I'd care to admit, and I'm pretty damn good at it. If I were to kill 32 beers in a night I'd end up in the hospital, and I may well die. Forcing someone people to do that is beyond idiotic; it's criminal negligence.

    Also, pro tip: If someone is inducing vomiting so they don't end up with alcohol poisoning, they're a moron.
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by