chuckseabreeze
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2007
- Messages
- 817
- Reaction score
- 1
What's the meaning behind this term, referring to C&J?
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Just think of it as the best that C&J's got to offer.
Slightly off-topic, but I'm curious as to the exceedingly poor quality of the 'official' photos of C&J shoes. It's almost as if they choose the poorest possible lighting and the focus is often terrible. It's only been through SF members' pics that I realized how beautiful they are. My main point being that you could certainly never tell any difference via the photos on the company's web site (and which are duplicated on almost all of the retail sites). SF pics have been my best guide in terms of aesthetic considerations...
+1. In particular the chestnut calf shoes are more reddish in colour in real life than the pics would suggest.
Also, are the belgrave's handmade or not? I've heard varying opinions on this...
Slightly off-topic, but I'm curious as to the exceedingly poor quality of the 'official' photos of C&J shoes. It's almost as if they choose the poorest possible lighting and the focus is often terrible. It's only been through SF members' pics that I realized how beautiful they are. My main point being that you could certainly never tell any difference via the photos on the company's web site (and which are duplicated on almost all of the retail sites). SF pics have been my best guide in terms of aesthetic considerations...
They are 'handgrade'. There is no 'varying opinion' on this. In print catalogues, in displays, on retail sites - the Belgrave is always a 'handgrade'.