• Hi, I'm the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Handgrade - What does it mean?

jjgold

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2006
Messages
502
Reaction score
0
channeled sole,better leather, differently assembled...anyone else out there?
 

lee_44106

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
8,043
Reaction score
100
Just think of it as the best that C&J's got to offer.
 

card_richelieu

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2008
Messages
116
Reaction score
0
Slightly off-topic, but I'm curious as to the exceedingly poor quality of the 'official' photos of C&J shoes. It's almost as if they choose the poorest possible lighting and the focus is often terrible. It's only been through SF members' pics that I realized how beautiful they are. My main point being that you could certainly never tell any difference via the photos on the company's web site (and which are duplicated on almost all of the retail sites). SF pics have been my best guide in terms of aesthetic considerations...
 

Collector23

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by card_richelieu
Slightly off-topic, but I'm curious as to the exceedingly poor quality of the 'official' photos of C&J shoes. It's almost as if they choose the poorest possible lighting and the focus is often terrible. It's only been through SF members' pics that I realized how beautiful they are. My main point being that you could certainly never tell any difference via the photos on the company's web site (and which are duplicated on almost all of the retail sites). SF pics have been my best guide in terms of aesthetic considerations...

+1. In particular the chestnut calf shoes are more reddish in colour in real life than the pics would suggest.
 

a tailor

Distinguished Member
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Jul 22, 2006
Messages
2,855
Reaction score
144
their saying that its their best grade. and an inference that its hand made?
i always suspect, when different grades of quality come out of the same workshop. how do you know what you are really getting?
 

kfan

Active Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Also, are the belgrave's handmade or not? I've heard varying opinions on this...
 

apropos

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Messages
4,461
Reaction score
402
Originally Posted by kfan
Also, are the belgrave's handmade or not? I've heard varying opinions on this...
They are 'handgrade'. There is no 'varying opinion' on this. In print catalogues, in displays, on retail sites - the Belgrave is always a 'handgrade'. Polo Ralph Lauren had the Bentons a while back, which were C&J-made and looked like rebadged Belgraves - but came in a lighter shade of brown (tan?).
 

Infrasonic

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
1,601
Reaction score
40
Originally Posted by card_richelieu
Slightly off-topic, but I'm curious as to the exceedingly poor quality of the 'official' photos of C&J shoes. It's almost as if they choose the poorest possible lighting and the focus is often terrible. It's only been through SF members' pics that I realized how beautiful they are. My main point being that you could certainly never tell any difference via the photos on the company's web site (and which are duplicated on almost all of the retail sites). SF pics have been my best guide in terms of aesthetic considerations...


I think the same criticism can be made about most of the Northampton manufacturers and the UK shop/online retailers that use stock photo's. It amazes me that companies that expect customers to pay hundreds of pounds for their goods have such crappy marketing.

The exception is Lobb, who have great photo's on a great website. But then Lobb is Hermes who know a thing or two about luxury brand marketing...
 

kfan

Active Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Ah, sorry, I had meant the RL Bentons.
 

NH_Clark

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2008
Messages
1,392
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by apropos
They are 'handgrade'. There is no 'varying opinion' on this. In print catalogues, in displays, on retail sites - the Belgrave is always a 'handgrade'.

Polo Ralph Lauren had the Bentons a while back, which were C&J-made and looked like rebadged Belgraves - but came in a lighter shade of brown (tan?).


A few months ago I snagged a pair of Belgraves off eBay. Topy with minimal wear. I never knew what the meaning of well-fitting quality shoes were until I wore these specimens of quaity shoes. Pure butter! My favorite shoe!
 

Featured Sponsor

What is the most important handwork to have on a shirt?

  • Hand attached collar

    Votes: 16 30.2%
  • Handsewn button holes

    Votes: 17 32.1%
  • Hand finish on yolk and shoulders

    Votes: 20 37.7%

Forum statistics

Threads
496,956
Messages
10,513,751
Members
221,713
Latest member
chalseamaker
Top