juniper
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2006
- Messages
- 379
- Reaction score
- 1
I can't seem to find this in the archives.
Is there any real difference other than aesthetics between repairing my soles with the leather cut off at the narrow part of the shoe (just replacing the worn part -- a "half sole") and replacing the whole lot, assuming both are done competantly?
This is a pair of Loake 1880 calf seconds which only cost 65GBP. The place I use charges 30 pounds for half sole and heel, 36 pounds for full sole and heel.
Is there any real difference other than aesthetics between repairing my soles with the leather cut off at the narrow part of the shoe (just replacing the worn part -- a "half sole") and replacing the whole lot, assuming both are done competantly?
This is a pair of Loake 1880 calf seconds which only cost 65GBP. The place I use charges 30 pounds for half sole and heel, 36 pounds for full sole and heel.