1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

Gucci or Ferragamo Horsebit Loafers

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by ralphandricky1967, Jul 23, 2009.

  1. ralphandricky1967

    ralphandricky1967 Senior member

    Messages:
    223
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Location:
    Malibu, New York, Chicago
  2. bsherman100

    bsherman100 Active Member

    Messages:
    36
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2009
  3. acidboy

    acidboy Senior member

    Messages:
    21,170
    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    between the two- gucci.
     
  4. Falstaff

    Falstaff Active Member

    Messages:
    44
    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    The Guccis. The Ferragamos look bizarre.
     
  5. emmanuel

    emmanuel Senior member

    Messages:
    1,958
    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Location:
    The Empire
    Easily Ferragamo but Im not in love with either.
     
  6. ranker

    ranker Senior member

    Messages:
    592
    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    In general, Gucci.

    But between the two you presented, Ferragamo.
     
  7. H2T

    H2T Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    67
    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Gucci. The Ferra looks too broad and square.
     
  8. SpooPoker

    SpooPoker Internet Bigtimer and Most Popular Man on Campus Dubiously Honored Affiliate Vendor

    Messages:
    35,887
    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2009
    Location:
    LuxeSwap
    Gucci. The Ferra looks too broad and square.

    +1 seems like Ferragamo 2002.
     
  9. fcuknu

    fcuknu Senior member

    Messages:
    4,487
    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Location:
    NYC
    yeah, those are really ugly lasts. You can do much better with both brands.
     
  10. mafoofan

    mafoofan Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    20,795
    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    Those Ferragamos are hideous. They look like they were designed to be sold exclusively at suburban Neiman Marcus stores.

    +1 for Gucci.
     
  11. emmanuel

    emmanuel Senior member

    Messages:
    1,958
    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Location:
    The Empire
    +1 seems like Ferragamo 2002.

    And the Guccis look modern? [​IMG]
     
  12. SpooPoker

    SpooPoker Internet Bigtimer and Most Popular Man on Campus Dubiously Honored Affiliate Vendor

    Messages:
    35,887
    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2009
    Location:
    LuxeSwap
    And the Guccis look modern? [​IMG]

    Modern for 1986. But I was just agreeing with the post about the Ferras.
     
  13. MyOtherLife

    MyOtherLife Senior member

    Messages:
    6,501
    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2009
    Location:
    The Arena - Centerfield
    Of the two above, my vote for the Gucci's. Personally I already sunk my money into a pair of Bally Vignolo's. Buttery soft & comfy. Those Gucci's look a touch heavier than my Bally's which is probably a good thing. [​IMG]
     
  14. IGORSEMONOV

    IGORSEMONOV Senior member

    Messages:
    220
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Location:
    VELIKIY NOVGOROD, RUSSIA
    I'd prefer Ferragamo.
     
  15. revamp

    revamp Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    63
    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Location:
    Washington, D.C.
    I prefer the Ferragamos in black leather but the Guccis in suede.
     
  16. luftvier

    luftvier Senior member

    Messages:
    3,919
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Location:
    Filthydelphia
    Both are ugly.

    Try something else with a more elongated last. Will add elegance to the equation.
     
  17. sho'nuff

    sho'nuff Senior member

    Messages:
    22,225
    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Location:
    Irvine
    I don't like both of them. These are with the thin soles and the guccis are of the moccassin type.

    There are better choices for both brands. There are the beefier ones in ferragamo not sure they still make them. I have one and is my favorite shoe to wear.
    The classic gucci with the higher heel and/or rubber lugged sole is very good.
     
  18. JayJay

    JayJay Senior member

    Messages:
    24,364
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    The classic gucci with the higher heel and/or rubber lugged sole is very good.
    +1. Gucci.
     
  19. ld111134

    ld111134 Senior member

    Messages:
    1,738
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago, Illinois
  20. baseball_guy

    baseball_guy Senior member

    Messages:
    314
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Those Ferragamos are hideous. They look like they were designed to be sold exclusively at suburban Neiman Marcus stores.

    +1 for Gucci.


    I was at Neiman Marcus tonight and I think I saw those Gucci loafers. I thought they looked good.
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by