1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.


    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

Grenson fit vs. C&J 337

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by Hanseat, Apr 28, 2006.

  1. Hanseat

    Hanseat Senior member

    Mar 20, 2006
    Freiburg, Germany
    Hello gentlemen,

    I am considering the purchase of a pair of Grensons (I'm late, I know) from Bennie's Shoes. After searching a bit through the archives I couldn't find a reference to their fit. Furthermore the lack of a name or last on this website makes it hard to really find a reference. So I thought about asking around here what the general consensus is on their fit is. I wear a pair of 10.5 E C&J Audley's on the 337 last, could go down to 10 E in retrospective though. So how do they compare? Or, does anyone know whether there are some oxfords (so, without the brogueing and possibly on a more chisseled-toe last) out there (leather sole)?

  2. dah328

    dah328 Senior member

    Dec 6, 2003
    You really need a Grenson last since they're not all the same. I find the Grenson lasts are shaped much differently than the C&J 337 last. On the Grensons, narrower heel, less elongated, and narrower around the ball of the foot.
  3. whoopee

    whoopee Senior member

    Jun 7, 2005
    11D should work.

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by