Soph
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2006
- Messages
- 4,006
- Reaction score
- 13
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
GNR? Are you serious? I mean, they're awesome, but also derivative and vapid as ****.Originally Posted by Edward Appleby
what were they derivative of?Originally Posted by gamelan
GNR? Are you serious? I mean, they're awesome, but also derivative and vapid as ****.Originally Posted by Edward Appleby
Aerosmith? Tom Petty?Originally Posted by Edward Appleby
Wow, vapid. What do you consider good music? There's very little that couldn't be considered "derivative" either. Some people don't realize what social impact groups or artists can have, and thus are absolutely horrible at being credible critics of music.Originally Posted by Violinist
ya, and Aerosmith is derivative of the stones, chuck berry...Originally Posted by Violinist
There's a difference between importance, which encompasses social impact, and quality, which (in my usage at least) doesn't.Originally Posted by Edward Appleby