STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
5mm lol. You should buy some vibergs and exchange the crap out of em.
I'm similar to this -- Brannock is 11.5, 11 is too tight on my toes, second best fit was 10eee. The Grant Stone EEEs don't mess around.Never know what you're going to get with CXL until it's too late to return. That said it's still a wonderful leather.
Trying out some Grant Stone boots in a different size soon. Despite my 9.5D brannock size I've realized that 9D is too tight for my toes. Wyatt suggested trying 8EEE. Will be interesting to see how that goes! Perhaps 9.5D or 9E would also work.
How do the quarters fit for you on the 10EEE compared to the 11D? My concern is that on the 9D they were already pretty close together. Not sure if they might touch or overlap on the 8EEE. Guess we will find out soon enough.I'm similar to this -- Brannock is 11.5, 11 is too tight on my toes, second best fit was 10eee. The Grant Stone EEEs don't mess around.
I wear the 11.5, which is a little big for me, but is good for my toes. 11 fits me perfectly everywhere but chomps my toes which I think makes them a no-go.How do the quarters fit for you on the 10EEE compared to the 11D? My concern is that on the 9D they were already pretty close together. Not sure if they might touch or overlap on the 8EEE. Guess we will find out soon enough.
Bad luck with an odd flaw on my first pair of GS loafers (not purchased as factory seconds). The outer sidewall on the shoe that has the green line is 5 mm shorter than the outer sidewall on the other shoe (measured at the green line). I think it's noticeable in the pic below, but probably a little moreso in real life. But looking at the pic below, you can see how the band of leather along the top edge of the problem shoe pitches downward more. That 5mm difference makes the sidewall about 11% shorter than the shoe's mate...so noticeable to the naked eye.
I am very laid back about most little craftsmanship flaws on GYW shoes, but I quickly noticed this during my initial inspection and really don't want a pair of shoes that's asymmetrical. So, I'm exchanging them for same make/model/size. Really love everything else tho, very attractive and nice fitting loafers, so I'm looking forward to getting the replacement pair.
View attachment 1674536
5mm lol. You should buy some vibergs and exchange the crap out of em.
Now I want a bespoke Italian cow. Complete with individual tastings as the cow grows older to make sure it’s on track to be delicious.While I think @GrantStone is exponentially better than other makes at the same price point, I think your personal expectations are not inline with the price point you are paying. Go measure every shoe, shirt, pants, coats, ties, and other clothing in your closet and I can assure you many, if not most, will have variances of more than 5mm. Don't pay for hamburger and expect prime rib.
And, after you measure all of your clothing for variances, you might as well read these blog posts from the expert himself, The Shoe Snob (aka Justin Fitzpatrick):
A Shoe's Price Point & What You Get In Return
A shoe's price point and what you get in return for paying that price are not always easily understood. You have cheap shoes that appeartheshoesnobblog.comA Breakdown of Shoe Pricing and What to Expect - Part 1
***Pics of shoes have nothing to do with the post, just for your eye candy*** There is a lot of confusion in the consumer's eyes on what you should expect from a pair of shoestheshoesnobblog.com
Not trying to be a jerk, but you did only spend $300 on a pair of shoes but are expecting a $1000 (or more) pair.
Now I want a bespoke Italian cow. Complete with individual tastings as the cow grows older to make sure it’s on track to be delicious.
Bad luck with an odd flaw on my first pair of GS loafers (not purchased as factory seconds). The outer sidewall on the shoe that has the green line is 5 mm shorter than the outer sidewall on the other shoe (measured at the green line). I think it's noticeable in the pic below, but probably a little moreso in real life. But looking at the pic below, you can see how the band of leather along the top edge of the problem shoe pitches downward more. That 5mm difference makes the sidewall about 11% shorter than the shoe's mate...so noticeable to the naked eye.
I am very laid back about most little craftsmanship flaws on GYW shoes, but I quickly noticed this during my initial inspection and really don't want a pair of shoes that's asymmetrical. So, I'm exchanging them for same make/model/size. Really love everything else tho, very attractive and nice fitting loafers, so I'm looking forward to getting the replacement pair.
View attachment 1674536
Has anybody ever bought Grant Stones that were such bad matching pairs leather-wise? I have looked through the whole gallery here and also all Grant Stone posted photos and tagged photos on Instagram and I think I just got really really unlucky. It is not the creasing that bugs me (cmxl is going to crease), it is more that fact that these 2 boots look drastically different, as if the vamp leather was cut from completely different hides. I do love Grant Stone, just wondering if anybody else has experienced this?
View attachment 1674408
Gotta love CXLWearing my GS veg tans right now. They are doing the same thing. I have a pair of (beloved) Alden Indy's doing the same. My left foot is just shaped different - a little wider, and I think might change my gait a little. Not sure, but it doesn't bother me.
View attachment 1674668
Like I said, the 5mm variance comes out to an 11% difference…I’ll add it was immediately noticeable within 5 min of looking at the shoes. If a shirt with 35 inch sleeves had an 11% variance, one sleeve would be almost 4 inches shorter than the other. In that case, it’s a clear defect and the shirt company would replace - which I’m guessing is what will happen with my loafers, I’ll get a symmetrical pair, and everyone will be happy.Go measure every shoe, shirt, pants, coats, ties, and other clothing in your closet and I can assure you many, if not most, will have variances of more than 5mm. Don't pay for hamburger and expect prime rib.
And, after you measure all of your clothing for variances, you might as well read these blog posts from the expert himself, Not trying to be a jerk, but you did only spend $300 on a pair of shoes but are expecting a $1000 (or more) pair.
I think you’re being fair and also think it’s very funny, and maybe that’s just the nature of us all being shoe dandies and our problems being, like, not real problems. ?Like I said, the 5mm variance comes out to an 11% difference…I’ll add it was immediately noticeable within 5 min of looking at the shoes. If a shirt with 35 inch sleeves had an 11% variance, one sleeve would be almost 4 inches shorter than the other. In that case, it’s a clear defect and the shirt company would replace - which I’m guessing is what will happen with my loafers, I’ll get a symmetrical pair, and everyone will be happy.
Btw, I find most “should I return these GYW shoes as defective” threads to be ridiculous..::but honestly think the issue I have here is pretty legit. The shoe looks clearly “off” from the side view.
I made my post out of general interest, not to crap on GS…a company I respect greatly (this isn’t my first pair of GS shoes).
Contact @GrantStone, they KNOW sizing, and will give you the right direction.Hi all,
I am considering purchasing the Diesel boot in Leo last. I am size US7.5 in Thursday boots and UK6.5 in Viberg 2030 last, with regular width and instep. My regular dress shoe size is US7.5/UK6.5 and they recommend sizing half size down.
Would you guys recommend taking the Leo last in US7 or match my Thursday/Viberg size and get US7.5?