STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I have found zero break in required for the micro-stud sole, the leather on the other hand, is rather "stiff" for a while.How does the sole break-in compare for the "dainite" sole compared to leather?
I have found zero break in required for the micro-stud sole, the leather on the other hand, is rather "stiff" for a while.
That’s why it’s good to purposefully flex the leather soles before and after the first few wears. When the soles are stiff starting out, the toe of the sole will dig into the ground while walking. I also wear leather soles just on carpet for a few days before going outside. This seems to help prevent toe wear. I am only 150 pounds, but I suppose heavier guys could properly flex new leather soles just from their weight while walking. Just my thoughts...
Even Grant Stone soles? If so, that’s impressive.
The mark of a great sole...Lol. I'm maybe 3-4 pounds shy of 120 pounds and I can't flex the leather soles to any degree until I've worn them at least 10 full days haha. These things are tough straight out of the box.
The single leather soles on their balmoral shoes break in much faster than the double leather soles on the Leo lasted shoes and boots. That said the single leather heels are just as tongue to break in as the LWBs and PTBs. The heel counters have yet to bother me on their boots. I've resorted to flexing the heel counters on the shoes with my hands pretty hard a few times early on. Seems to help a lot with the break in time.Very interesting....you know I have a hell of a hard time with the heel counters, but I found zero difference between the micro-stud and the leather. I did find a difference between the travelers and everything else - the travelers broke in faster.
How does the sole break-in compare for the "dainite" sole compared to leather?
This is a great idea. I also seem to wear the toes on GS leather soles, but it seems to subside after a bit of break-in. I'll try this method next time.That’s why it’s good to purposefully flex the leather soles before and after the first few wears. When the soles are stiff starting out, the toe of the sole will dig into the ground while walking. I also wear leather soles just on carpet for a few days before going outside. This seems to help prevent toe wear. I am only 150 pounds, but I suppose heavier guys could properly flex new leather soles just from their weight while walking. Just my thoughts...
easily one of my all-time favorites. I also like the bourbon suede travelers.
I’ve never had issues with breaking in a double leather sole. I don’t have a slight frame but I’m not a huge guy either. I’ve sort of been on the lookout for an Oxford/Balmoral with a double leather sole or something like Edward Green’s HAF sole. I even have these JM Weston’s with a triple sole. I just don’t find single leather soles very comfortable.
View attachment 1422980
It's a single leather sole but is fairly thick.Wouldnt the new @GrantStone Fairfield be perfect then? I’m assuming they use the same thick leather sole as their derbies, but I don’t own any of their oxfords.