1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

GQ America's Forum Awful?

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by blairh, Nov 24, 2009.

  1. blairh

    blairh Senior member

    Messages:
    777
    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2009
    Does anyone here agree that GQ's American website forum is very disappointing? I'm grateful to have stumbled upon this forum. It's everything GQ's forum is not.

    On a related note, does anyone here prefer GQ's British edition over the American one? I'm an American and I enjoy the American GQ, but sometimes I'll purchase the British edition and find it superior in many ways.

    Lastly, very surprised the British GQ website doesn't even have a forum section from what I can tell.
     
  2. idfnl

    idfnl Senior member

    Messages:
    14,339
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Location:
    VA
    Does anyone here agree that GQ's American website forum is very disappointing? I'm grateful to have stumbled upon this forum. It's everything GQ's forum is not. On a related note, does anyone here prefer GQ's British edition over the American one? I'm an American and I enjoy the American GQ, but sometimes I'll purchase the British edition and find it superior in many ways. Lastly, very surprised the British GQ website doesn't even have a forum section from what I can tell.
    GQ in general has become disappointing. Too much emphasis on fashion and trend, not enough on style and quality. If I ran the magazine, I'd eliminate all the fast paced razzle dazzle and add simple articles on topics like taking care of cashmere, or tie knots, storing sweaters, or what to look for ordering a custom shirt, etc, anything but the stupid tosser articles you see now. Has anyone tried to read that crap recently? Man, talk about boring. Unfortunately, they are trying to appeal to a younger crowd, that 18 to 35 bs... now that I am 37, I am starting to sense that I am being marginalized. Believe me, its much more about 18 y olds than it is about 35. Esquire is much better, IMO, but could use a bit less bullshit too.
     
  3. w.o.e.is.me.

    w.o.e.is.me. Senior member

    Messages:
    1,710
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2009
    Unfortunately, they are trying to appeal to a younger crowd, that 18 to 35 bs... now that I am 37, I am starting to sense that I am being marginalized. Believe me, its much more about 18 y olds than it is about 35.

    In defense of the < 35 crowd, we need something to save us from the literary disaster that is Details.
     
  4. dsgNYC

    dsgNYC Senior member

    Messages:
    422
    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    GQ Forum [​IMG] Styleforum
     
  5. niidawg3

    niidawg3 Senior member

    Messages:
    3,495
    Joined:
    May 26, 2009
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Does anyone here agree that GQ's American website forum is very disappointing? I'm grateful to have stumbled upon this forum. It's everything GQ's forum is not.

    On a related note, does anyone here prefer GQ's British edition over the American one? I'm an American and I enjoy the American GQ, but sometimes I'll purchase the British edition and find it superior in many ways.

    Lastly, very surprised the British GQ website doesn't even have a forum section from what I can tell.


    that is how i found this forum - so i thank them for that.
     
  6. idfnl

    idfnl Senior member

    Messages:
    14,339
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Location:
    VA
    In defense of the < 35 crowd, we need something to save us from the literary disaster that is Details.

    Are you saying you find the information in GQ stimulating and interesting?
     
  7. chorse123

    chorse123 Senior member

    Messages:
    10,448
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2004
    I saw something about their redesigned website and took a quick look. The forum interface is terrible. Is it that hard to get it right?
     
  8. blairh

    blairh Senior member

    Messages:
    777
    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2009
    the new American GQ website is much improved design wise. but the forum is still atrocious. you would think they'd make something easy and fun to use. absolutely not. it's filled with spam topics and honestly a very low reply rate with regards to topics started.

    as for the magazine, they have focused way too much print on restaurants and too little on tech. i also am tired of the actresses that they feature on the cover which usually leads to boring articles about them (january jones, olivia wilde, etc).

    would like more pages devoted to music, film, tech, less to serious subject matters (unless it's super interesting or important) and food.
     
  9. porcelain monkey

    porcelain monkey Senior member

    Messages:
    1,820
    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    Location:
    Boston
    I didn't even know they had a forum until recently and it took me a while to find it. After looking at a few things there I think I'll loose it again. Overall the blogs on the web site are OK - worth a quick read from time to time.

    On other GQ topics, I got a free subscription about a year ago (I think it's because I opened up a J Crew Card, but I don't really know why) and I have to say I kind of like looking at it. Much of the "style" stuff is clearly aimed at a younger crowd (down vest under a suit coat anyone?), but I do feel it helps me keep up with what the kids are doing these days. I'm 41, by the way.

    The good parts are Glenn O'Brian's Style Guy column and, actually, much of the pop culture / celebrity stuff. Again it keeps me in tune. I don't read people or anything else. I also like Alan Richman's food writing, in general. When they picked Sid Mashburn as one of the 10 most stylish men in America it kept me coming back - even though they put Justin Timberlake on the cover of that issue.
     
  10. w.o.e.is.me.

    w.o.e.is.me. Senior member

    Messages:
    1,710
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2009
    Are you saying you find the information in GQ stimulating and interesting?
    I know GQ is widely lambasted around here, but hey. Some people have to start somewhere right? I'm not ashamed of my subscription. admittedly, that january jones piece *was* terrible.
     
  11. malefic

    malefic Senior member

    Messages:
    210
    Joined:
    May 10, 2009
    You can say all you want about how useful it is[n't], but GQ's recent profile of Christian Audigier is one of the most hilarious things I've ever read.
     
  12. idfnl

    idfnl Senior member

    Messages:
    14,339
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Location:
    VA
    I know GQ is widely lambasted around here, but hey. Some people have to start somewhere right? I'm not ashamed of my subscription.
    admittedly, that january jones piece *was* terrible.


    Try esquire, its much better.
     
  13. porcelain monkey

    porcelain monkey Senior member

    Messages:
    1,820
    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    Location:
    Boston
    Try esquire, its much better.

    I'm not so sure I agree. It's no worse, but overall I don't find it better.
     
  14. w.o.e.is.me.

    w.o.e.is.me. Senior member

    Messages:
    1,710
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2009
    Try esquire, its much better.

    I get both.
    and am open to other suggestions?
     
  15. ChicagoJohn

    ChicagoJohn Senior member

    Messages:
    313
    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    I get GQ, Details, and Esquire. They're all fairly boring and I subscribe only for the pictures. Across them all, there are some months I literally laugh out loud at how God aweful some of the looks and advice are.

    And the whole &quot;take a picture of me jumping in this suit&quot; schtick is disturbing. Men don't jump in suits. Most men don't jump, period. So why does every issue have some knob jumping around in a too-tight suit??

    But yes, you've got to start somewhere. Just make sure you advance past it.
     
  16. idfnl

    idfnl Senior member

    Messages:
    14,339
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Location:
    VA
    I'm not so sure I agree. It's no worse, but overall I don't find it better.

    Its personal taste, esquire speaks to me more, better written, more practical content. I like Tom Chiarella's stuff.

    They are not hugely different, btw.
     
  17. MyOtherLife

    MyOtherLife Senior member

    Messages:
    6,501
    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2009
    Location:
    The Arena - Centerfield
    A lot of beginners may believe this is the GQ forum.
    Once they learn it isn't, they are not disappointed.
    The SF WAYWRN thread alone here packs more punch in photos, than GQ, DETAILS & Esquire mags combined. It's obvious that the 'writers' for GQ/DETAILS are paying lip service to their sponsors
    (and probably getting one hell of a nice free wardrobe in the process, not mentioning other perks)
    I agree that without their photos there is little else those mags offer.
    We can see better photos and get better and more immediate advice online right here.
    As far as the GQ forum online, it just doesn't compete.
    Styleforum rules.
    AAAC gets my nod for second place, and Fedora Lounge takes 3rd
    BTW can anyone recommed any other good english speaking forums online?
     
  18. blairh

    blairh Senior member

    Messages:
    777
    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2009
    i've been a GQ subscriber for about 9 years (i'm 29). overall i enjoy the magazine and given it's yearly price ($12) it's a no brainer. i just wish the british GQ was cheaper.

    but GQ is def going for the 18 - 40 age bracket. just how it is. i am tired of seeing actors jumping in suits, and i do wish it was twice as thick, but i'm content.
     
  19. kcc

    kcc Senior member

    Messages:
    614
    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2006
    Location:
    South Seas
     
  20. idfnl

    idfnl Senior member

    Messages:
    14,339
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Location:
    VA
    i've been a GQ subscriber for about 9 years (i'm 29). overall i enjoy the magazine and given it's yearly price ($12) it's a no brainer. i just wish the british GQ was cheaper.

    but GQ is def going for the 18 - 40 age bracket. just how it is. i am tired of seeing actors jumping in suits, and i do wish it was twice as thick, but i'm content.



    Ha ha, ya thats another annoying point, they photograph the people and the clothes in all these stupid poses and you cant see anything.

    I'll take the grainy-ass iphone bathroom at work photos in WAYWRN any day. At least they are standing still.
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by