1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

Gaydar

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by von Rothbart, Jul 8, 2007.

  1. mack11211

    mack11211 Senior member

    Messages:
    6,436
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Location:
    Brooklyn USA
    I won't get into this any deeper as simply reading words on an internet forum sometimes leads itself to misinterpretation and I don't want to come off as a homophobe. As I said, I joke about it all the time but I truly couldn't care less about what anyone does and who anyone does in their bedroom.
    It was just an odd statement. I don't take you for a homo, neither 'phobe nor 'phile. What goes on between your Rubirosa and the swimsuit model, or not, is of no interest to me -- unless it involves steeply discounted Incotex, of course.
     
  2. EL72

    EL72 Senior member

    Messages:
    6,860
    Joined:
    May 11, 2006
    Location:
    Toronto
    I have long thought that if homosexuality is a genetically transmitted, immutable trait, as contemporary "enlightened" doctrine maintains, then ipso facto, this proves the Darwinian theory of Natural Selection wrong--far more than the cleversilly arguments of the Creationists!

    This assumes that men would be excusively homosexual but the trait can be passed on while men produce offspring with women, which happens a lot in some societies of closet homosexuality.
     
  3. edmorel

    edmorel Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    25,670
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Location:
    NYC
    Maybe ed's implying something about the size of his... commitment.... in the hope GQGeek is reading?

    [​IMG]

    It was just an odd statement.

    I don't take you for a homo, neither 'phobe nor 'phile.

    What goes on between your Rubirosa and the swimsuit model, or not, is of no interest to me -- unless it involves steeply discounted Incotex, of course.


    I'm an odd guy.

    No steeply discounted clothing, you gays are given way too many perks by society as it is [​IMG]
     
  4. globetrotter

    globetrotter Senior member

    Messages:
    20,605
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Location:
    greater chicago
    I have long thought that if homosexuality is a genetically transmitted, immutable trait, as contemporary "enlightened" doctrine maintains, then ipso facto, this proves the Darwinian theory of Natural Selection wrong--far more than the cleversilly arguments of the Creationists!

    not at all - evolution deals with genes, not individuals. if an argument can be made than having a gay family member promotes the genes (for instance, having a gay uncle means that every family has an additional adult male giving support) then it in no way contridicts darwinism.
     
  5. imageWIS

    imageWIS Senior member

    Messages:
    20,008
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    New York City / Buenos Aires
    Well, not being gay I can't speak for anyone that is and my comment was a bit of a joke but, for me at least, if you are attracted sexually to men (and you are a man), you are gay, there is no bisexual. The sex act between two men is very different from the sex act between two women and I think it is fair to say that it requires a much bigger "commitment", one that does not lend itself to experimentation.


    That's wrong.

    Jon.
     
  6. edmorel

    edmorel Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    25,670
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Location:
    NYC
    That's wrong.

    Jon.


    Just my opinion and you know what they say about opinions (they are like a-holes, everyone has one and it usually stinks) [​IMG]
     
  7. Connemara

    Connemara Senior member

    Messages:
    39,486
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Just my opinion and you know what they say about opinions (they are like a-holes, everyone has one and it usually stinks) [​IMG]

    Mine smells of freshly-picked lavender.
     
  8. Willsw

    Willsw Senior member

    Messages:
    1,221
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Location:
    DC
    If there is no bisexual, are those formerly known as bisexuals just gay men who like women? Is there a difference between those men and straight guys who like men?

    And what about pure attraction, without sexual act? If one is more attracted to men than women (as a man) but has no desire to have sex with men, while maintaining that desire for women?

    gaygayagyagayagayagayggagagyagayagyagayagaygayagay.
     
  9. edmorel

    edmorel Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    25,670
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Location:
    NYC
    Mine smells of freshly-picked lavender.

    Don't believe everything GQGeek tells you.
     
  10. CBDB

    CBDB Senior member

    Messages:
    508
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2006
    Location:
    Toronto
    "I tell you, when a homosexual is sucking your cock, a lot of strange thoughts go through your head: How the hell did this happen? Where did this fairy ever get the idea that I was gay? And where did he get those fabulous boots?"

    ...and I thought he was just being friendly [​IMG]
     
  11. imageWIS

    imageWIS Senior member

    Messages:
    20,008
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    New York City / Buenos Aires
    SF is just like the Catholic Church: there are no gay people here.

    Jon.
     
  12. mensimageconsultant

    mensimageconsultant Senior member

    Messages:
    4,537
    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2006
    This assumes that men would be excusively homosexual but the trait can be passed on while men produce offspring with women, which happens a lot in some societies of closet homosexuality.

    Actually, it is not that uncommon in rather tolerant countries such as the United States.

    Despite the ridicule, the research is a good idea. Think of all the prejudice against people that is based on rather unreliable cues, such as slim-fit clothing and bold colors. Goodness, when you consider aversion as prejudice, it probably is done to, or done by, almost everyone.
     
  13. EL72

    EL72 Senior member

    Messages:
    6,860
    Joined:
    May 11, 2006
    Location:
    Toronto
    not at all - evolution deals with genes, not individuals. if an argument can be made than having a gay family member promotes the genes (for instance, having a gay uncle means that every family has an additional adult male giving support) then it in no way contridicts darwinism.

    Well no. If there is a gay gene then you need gay people to reproduce in order for the trait to live on. If gay uncles never have any kids than eventually there will no longer be any gay uncles.
     
  14. mensimageconsultant

    mensimageconsultant Senior member

    Messages:
    4,537
    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2006
    There's evidence that the womb environment can affect sexual orientation.
     
  15. JBZ

    JBZ Senior member

    Messages:
    2,281
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Despite the ridicule, the research is a good idea. Think of all the prejudice against people that is based on rather unreliable cues, such as slim-fit clothing and bold colors.

    Oh, I agree. If I'm going to be prejudiced against someone for being gay, I damn well want to make sure he's gay. I'd be really embarrassed if I acted in a prejudiced manner toward someone under the mistaken impression that he was gay.

    I mean, it's easy to be prejudiced against the blacks or the Asians, 'cause you can tell, y'know. The Jews are kind of tricky, so I'd appreciate some more information there. I don't have time to spend my days staking out the local kosher market.
     
  16. imageWIS

    imageWIS Senior member

    Messages:
    20,008
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    New York City / Buenos Aires
    There's evidence that the womb environment can affect sexual orientation.

    All womb environments are pink...how come we're not all gay?

    Jon.
     
  17. EL72

    EL72 Senior member

    Messages:
    6,860
    Joined:
    May 11, 2006
    Location:
    Toronto
    There's evidence that the womb environment can affect sexual orientation.

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  18. mensimageconsultant

    mensimageconsultant Senior member

    Messages:
    4,537
    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2006
    Oh, I agree. If I'm going to be prejudiced against someone for being gay, I damn well want to make sure he's gay. I'd be really embarrassed if I acted in a prejudiced manner toward someone under the mistaken impression that he was gay.

    Prejudice will happen anyway. Besides, for women looking to marry, it's important to quickly filter out those who might be gay.
     
  19. Bandwagonesque

    Bandwagonesque Senior member

    Messages:
    2,237
    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2006
    Location:
    Canada
    There's evidence that the womb environment can affect sexual orientation.

    My womb was a gay bathouse.
     
  20. Connemara

    Connemara Senior member

    Messages:
    39,486
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    My womb was a gay bathouse.

    Did Bette Midler and Barry Manilow perform often?
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by