josepidal
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
- Messages
- 2,202
- Reaction score
- 81
Sorry, let me try again.
On a dress shirt sleeve, is there any functional difference between your usual sleeve with two pleats tucked into the cuff and the shirring or gathering or the use of many tiny pleats to fold the sleeve into the cuff? The latter is the "signature shirring" on Brooks Brothers and Turnbull & Asser shirts.
The way I understand it, there is no difference in terms of fit. However, the change in pleat style means the way the sleeve fabric falls around the cuff is different. The usual pleats are more structured and the shirring makes the fabric fall more evenly. The latter looks less formal to some, more feminine to others, and trad to still others.
I think Kabbaz also said the shirring around the cuff is easier to tailor than the pleats.
Sorry for bringing up the shoulders and memories of a clusterf*ck about pattern matching.
On a dress shirt sleeve, is there any functional difference between your usual sleeve with two pleats tucked into the cuff and the shirring or gathering or the use of many tiny pleats to fold the sleeve into the cuff? The latter is the "signature shirring" on Brooks Brothers and Turnbull & Asser shirts.
The way I understand it, there is no difference in terms of fit. However, the change in pleat style means the way the sleeve fabric falls around the cuff is different. The usual pleats are more structured and the shirring makes the fabric fall more evenly. The latter looks less formal to some, more feminine to others, and trad to still others.
I think Kabbaz also said the shirring around the cuff is easier to tailor than the pleats.
Sorry for bringing up the shoulders and memories of a clusterf*ck about pattern matching.