Foofing Foo

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by dieworkwear, May 10, 2011.

  1. dieworkwear

    dieworkwear Senior member

    Messages:
    7,683
    Likes Received:
    12,456
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    Matt published a great post yesterday over at TITC, showing off his new Ambrosi trousers. I really liked it, but thought there were some really interesting rules being broken. Namely, here was a shorter man wearing big cuffs and a slight break. Moreover, it was surprising to see him wear pleats, given how slim he is. I thought it would be make for a good opportunity to Foof Foo, if you will, and start a discussion on whether these rules about breaks, cuffs, and pleats are a bit overstated. Or has Matt just lost his way and need to report to the Forvm Covncil? Let us discuss. [​IMG]
     
  2. chrisb0109

    chrisb0109 Senior member

    Messages:
    794
    Likes Received:
    11
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Location:
    Minneapolis
    I find the whole thing strange looking in either case.
     
  3. Loathing

    Loathing Senior member

    Messages:
    1,095
    Likes Received:
    196
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2011
    Location:
    London
    I prefer the cuffs, and the realistic creasing/stacking.
     
  4. gladhands

    gladhands Senior member

    Messages:
    2,267
    Likes Received:
    131
    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    I find the whole thing strange looking in either case.

    Yup
     
  5. pvrhye

    pvrhye Senior member

    Messages:
    1,757
    Likes Received:
    14
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2010
    Location:
    화곡동 - Seoul
    700$ trousers with a sweatshirt is a bit odd.
     
  6. teddieriley

    teddieriley Senior member

    Messages:
    8,505
    Likes Received:
    233
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2006
    Location:
    Wait, you smell that?
    You could have at least DWWd the tree into a hot chick.
     
  7. luftvier

    luftvier Senior member

    Messages:
    3,919
    Likes Received:
    618
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Location:
    Filthydelphia
    [​IMG] is a bit odd.

    [​IMG]
     
  8. dieworkwear

    dieworkwear Senior member

    Messages:
    7,683
    Likes Received:
    12,456
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    700$ trousers with a sweatshirt is a bit odd.

    The right to wear that sweatshirt actually costs $40,000 x 4 years. The only proper thing to wear with $160,000 sweatshirts are bespoke Ambrosi trousers.
     
  9. HRoi

    HRoi Senior member

    Messages:
    17,802
    Likes Received:
    5,801
    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Why does the sweatshirt declare its color in big bold letters? I suppose it's to help the color blind, but surely the font size could be smaller?! [​IMG]
     
  10. linkinwayne

    linkinwayne Senior member

    Messages:
    1,688
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    Location:
    Edmonton.
    The right to wear that sweatshirt actually costs $40,000 x 4 years. The only proper thing to wear with $160,000 sweatshirts are bespoke Ambrosi trousers.
    I like wearing sweatshirts from other universities for kicks. I usually grab them for < $20 on sale
     
  11. bringusingoodale

    bringusingoodale Senior member

    Messages:
    1,491
    Likes Received:
    48
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Location:
    Disputed Zone
    But... but where's his jacket and tie?


    [​IMG]
     
  12. IndianBoyz

    IndianBoyz Senior member

    Messages:
    3,656
    Likes Received:
    145
    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    I still don't get it. Brown Uni Ivy League? [​IMG] The Brown Uni basketball coach? [​IMG]
     
  13. ter1413

    ter1413 Senior member

    Messages:
    18,093
    Likes Received:
    1,882
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Location:
    Central Booking
    The right to wear that sweatshirt actually costs $40,000 x 4 years. The only proper thing to wear with $160,000 sweatshirts are bespoke Ambrosi trousers.

    -1
     
  14. hendrix

    hendrix Ill-proportioned

    Messages:
    9,457
    Likes Received:
    3,716
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    why the hell would you make the pants no break? seems a terrible idea.


    i'd keep the pants exactly as they are, just change the sweater for something not ugly.
     
  15. tim_horton

    tim_horton Senior member

    Messages:
    833
    Likes Received:
    58
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2010
    I like the pre-altered pants better. But I don't think the pants look good with a sweatshirt. Flannel or not, they just look too formal for that. I would go with chinos (also, I'd cringe sitting on grass with pants that expensive.)

    I have a similar pair from HY, and to be honest despite the fact that light gray flannel seems to be an SF staple, I find them hard to pair things with. Too much contrast with my sports coats, and when I wear them without a coat I look way too... white overall (most of my dress shirts are are white, light blue or a patterned version of those two colors.) And like I said, too formal for things like sweat shirts or tees.
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by