• We are thrilled to welcome Capra Leather to the Styleforum family of official Affiliate Vendors.They are a hand crafted, made to order leather goods family company. Their products have unique designs with a aesthetic that blend minimalism, tradition and functionality. Focused on sustainability they offer a lifetime warranty on every piece.

    Give Capra a warm welcome on their Official Affiliate Thread

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Finance: Implied and Historical Volatility

fairholme_wannabe

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
333
Reaction score
0
For anyone with interest in capital markets and finance:

I am presently researching volatility (historical volatility and implied volatility), and the distributions of each have me completely baffled. First, let me preface this by saying that implied volatility is proxied via the ^VXO instead of the ^VIX, as it has more history.

That said, the mean of the ^VXO is 8 points higher (or approximately 62% higher) than the mean historical volatility across the life of my study (20+ years). Additionally, the distribution patterns are pretty dissimilar, as historical volatility is distributed with both much greater skewness and kurtosis than the ^VXO. WTF!? Any explications for why this is observed?
 

gnatty8

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Nov 12, 2006
Messages
11,977
Reaction score
4,611
One is forward looking and risk neutral, the other is backward looking and realized, so risk does not play a part. Implied volatility is rarely if ever equal to historic probabilities. Why would I write an option for you with the expectation of only breaking even?
 

JoelF

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
1,452
Reaction score
2
What Gnatty said. My shorthand, non-quant explanation - implied vol is really just a way of quoting option prices, with option premium calculated using Black Scholes or some variant depending on the structure. Historic vol is the statistical volatility (maybe weighted) of a market data series. The option models are typically pretty bad approximations, so the market uses an implied vol surface which means the quoted vols vary by option strike and expiration. If you had a perfect option model and knew the exact values of all other parameters (e.g. risk free rate) then I guess implied vol would be constant across the surface and also equal to historic vol.
 

fairholme_wannabe

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
333
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by gnatty8
One is forward looking and risk neutral, the other is backward looking and realized, so risk does not play a part. Implied volatility is rarely if ever equal to historic probabilities. Why would I write an option for you with the expectation of only breaking even?

Gnatty,

Thanks for your response. I'm not trying to say that implied volatility should be equal to historical volatility, per se. I'm more interested in their respective distributions. Does that explain why the distributions themselves are so dissimilar?

On the flip side, why would I buy an option from you with the expectation of losing money?
 

gnatty8

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Nov 12, 2006
Messages
11,977
Reaction score
4,611
Originally Posted by fairholme_wannabe
On the flip side, why would I buy an option from you with the expectation of losing money?

Unless you are a market-maker, you have no choice. Have you heard of the bid-offer spread? You also might think your model is better, or your own forecast of vols are different than mine.
 

Lostinthesupermarket

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
327
Reaction score
0
On a related point is it true that implied volatility over the past 6 months or so has been a lot lower than realised ?
 

fairholme_wannabe

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
333
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by Lostinthesupermarket
On a related point is it true that implied volatility over the past 6 months or so has been a lot lower than realised ?
Lost, with regards to 30 Day realized volatility v. implied volatility of S&P 100, between Oct. 20, 2008 and Jan. 6, 2009, there were 47 trading days where previous 30 day realized volatility was higher than implied volatility. Since then, however, implied volatility has been higher than realized every trading day.
 

gnatty8

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Nov 12, 2006
Messages
11,977
Reaction score
4,611
Originally Posted by Lostinthesupermarket
On a related point is it true that implied volatility over the past 6 months or so has been a lot lower than realised ?

Would not be surprised.. One of the reasons for the existence of the volatility smile in implied vols.. Fat tails in asset returns.. Also not surprised that market makers may now be over-compensating..
 

andrewhay

New Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2011
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I prefer to do analysis on volatility therefor I have taken implied volatility data from a company although It will be harder to to analyze without any expert experience but I love to do such kind of an analysis It's hard to crack the implied volatility but hope it can be effectively bypassed.
 

Featured Sponsor

What do you normally wear on Mondays at work?

  • Suit, shirt, and tie

  • Suit and shirt, no tie

  • Dress shirt and trousers, jacket or sport coat, tie

  • Dress shirt and trousers, jacket or sport coat, no tie

  • Dress shirt and trousers, no tie or jacket

  • Casual trousers and shirt (polo, t-shirt, etc.)


Results are only viewable after voting.

Forum statistics

Threads
483,430
Messages
10,287,197
Members
216,237
Latest member
Twobucktin
Top