lance konami
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2006
- Messages
- 1,284
- Reaction score
- 17
I'm starting to think so. Thoughts?
EDIT: I meant to post this in the streetwear forum. Sorry.
EDIT: I meant to post this in the streetwear forum. Sorry.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
It's where they tuck their (usually) tee shirt just in the front, behind the belt.Originally Posted by lance konami
The line between AmJack and metrosexuality is thin.Originally Posted by tiecollector
Excuse me?Originally Posted by gdl203
Excuse me?Originally Posted by gdl203
The line between AmJack and metrosexuality is thin.Originally Posted by tiecollector
Excuse me?Originally Posted by gdl203
I dunno, I pretty much agree. The polar opposite of metro is probably a redneck who wears his hunting clothes to the bar, not a dude who wears tons of gel, stripey "fashionable" shirt, "fashionable" jeans, "fashionable" shoes, etc.Originally Posted by j
The faux tuck accomplishes much of what the mullet tried to do "serious in the front, party in the back," but with much more versatility.Originally Posted by tiecollector
Are you sure you're in the right place?tucking your shirt in without a suit or shirt and tie is too preppy and @$$hole-ish.