1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

ET Wright Shoes: Over what period were they good?

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by Peli, Feb 4, 2015.

  1. Peli

    Peli Active Member

    Messages:
    42
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    I did an extensive search on both this site and others but couldn't find a full answer. At what point did ET Wright's quality decline? Would it be safe to assume that their Made in USA shoes are of good quality? If so, how would they compare to other common brands?
     
  2. well-kept

    well-kept Senior member

    Messages:
    887
    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    The early, union-made Arch Preservers are excellent shoes. As is so often true, the older the shoe, the higher the quality. They are not easy to date with precision, but if you can find a pair with a sewn-in cloth label you will have made a score. They are generally on a par with vintage Florsheims from the same period.
     
  3. Peli

    Peli Active Member

    Messages:
    42
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Thanks for your input. Any clue as to when they started manufacturing overseas? Is it fair to characterize their USA made shoes as better?

     
  4. well-kept

    well-kept Senior member

    Messages:
    887
    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    It depends on what you mean by 'overseas'. Wright offered a line of English-made shoes, which did not have the arch-preserver construction. They were made by Sanders, not bad and not great.

    I've never owned any except the American production although I have seen shoes on line bearing the Wright name which look to have been made in Italy or in Asia. It's a safe bet that these don't hold up to the originals. I could offer a guess that as with other American manufacturers, Wright began offshore outsourcing sometime in the 1980s.

    The good news is that you can find very good Wrights on line, often unused, for extremely reasonable prices. These are drastically undervalued, in my view. Look for the Wright Breather line, and their Cordwainer shoes.
     
  5. Dred Scott

    Dred Scott New Member

    Messages:
    1
    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2015
    I used to sell them back in the late 70s. Excellent shoe. I have met WW2 Vets who bought a few pairs after the war and still had them 30 years later.
     
  6. Sam212

    Sam212 New Member

    Messages:
    2
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2013
    I started wearing E.T. Wright shoes in the early 1970s and bought my last pair around 1991. I thought hey were a solid step above Florsheim's- except for a few high-end Florsheim styles. In the 1970s, I bought Wright slip ons, and then I discovered this very comfortable and sylish lace-up, 4 eyelet, wing tip in 1979 and later bought two replacements of the same shoe. After that I shifted to J&M, again with lace-up styles.

    Meanwhile Wright discontinued this favorite style of mine. I think the quality was good in this period from about 1974-1991, although I did notice the arch preserver "bump" had become less pronounced.
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by