ES Hutch - fit.

[mattjames]

My waist measures 35 inches and I favour a fairly slim fit. Can someone familiar with the sizing of these Jeans advise me on what size to buy?

I remember ordering a pair online ages ago, in 36, and they were far to big in the waist, and felt baggy overall so I was kinda put off them. But looking again at the way they fit the yoox model, I'd really like a pair that would fit me in that way. Should I size down?

thanks.

 

[mattjames]

In fact, look at this. These are both the ES Hutch model in Formula 21 wash, as seen at Revolve and Yoox. They look like different jeans. I love the fit and colour of the Yoox version, but not the Revolve version. Buying online is a damned nightmare. Which one is more accurate?







All I want is some nice jeans that fit snug ********** and thighs with a slight boot opening below the knee, and with a ritch, vibrant blue wash.

 

[mattjames]

BTW I bought my hutches which I returned from Yoox, not knowing at the time that they were the Hutch model, but finding that out when I looked at the inner printing. Does their photo even show the Hutch model?

 

[weirdnjfan1]

Yeah, those ES in the picture the Hutch. I just brought a pair that looks like the second one. I have a few different pairs of boot cuts in various jeans, I can say that honestly the tighter the fit of jeans, the better they look. In the baggy fit, it doesn't look as good.

 

[Babar]

Hmm.. Though I much prefer how they look at Revolve (now that's a first!) I think you'd get the yoox-look by going one size down. It's a pretty slim cut, but my 33 ES Hutch are *much* more baggy than my 32 Bootcut Olas for instance. If I'd gotten a 32 or 31, they'd probably look like those in the yoox pics.

 

[boo]

You'd definitely want to size down from your true waist in ES. I'd probably recommend a 33. I'm not positive because my waist size hasn't been stable as of late (been shrinking, fortunately), but I recall trying on 34s while my waist was 35 and had a fit similar to that in the Revolve pic.

 

[seen]

Because ES isnt really true to size, they're one size larger than the label.

 

[whodini]

...proving once again that the revolve model isn't human.

That's a nice wash on the yoox hutches, though.

 

[mattjames]

Originally Posted by whodini

That's a nice wash on the yoox hutches, though.
They are both supposed to be the same wash. The difference in the colour between them is quite striking, IMO. The Revolve Hutch looks like a million other jeans in colour, completely uninspiring, but the Yoox has the kind of blue that I'm finding to be far too rare.

 

[mattjames]

Originally Posted by weirdnjfan1

Yeah, those ES in the picture the Hutch. I just brought a pair that looks like the second one. I have a few different pairs of boot cuts in various jeans, I can say that honestly the tighter the fit of jeans, the better they look. In the baggy fit, it doesn't look as good.


Would you say your Hutch's match the colour of those in the Yoox photography?


Thanks guys.

 

[BubblyMasquerade]

Mhmm mine do, Revolve is notorious for bad pictures and even worse models. Also, a smart person would go to www.earnestsewn.com.

 

[mattjames]

Originally Posted by BubblyMasquerade

Mhmm mine do, Revolve is notorious for bad pictures and even worse models. Also, a smart person would go to www.earnestsewn.com.

Why? They're considerably more expensive there.

 

[whodini]

Originally Posted by mattjames

Why? They're considerably more expensive there.
Think bubbly was referring to another source for images, but if that's the same wash then I'm Herbert Hoover. Man that's a difference.

 

[BubblyMasquerade]

Originally Posted by whodini

Think bubbly was referring to another source for images.


Yep Yep

 

[mattjames]

The F 21 wash looks the same colour, but it has excessive distressing. I've noticed some on ebay of the same kind. The ones I got from Yoox were nothing like that.