1. Hi. We moved systems, and because it was impossible to achieve feature parity between the systems, we opted to archive the old B&S threads but allow users to read them so that they can put them into our new B&S system.

    There is a support thread if you have any issues.

    Cheers,

    Fok.

Dismiss Notice

STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Epaulet Tweed Rudy Trousers / Pants 33 (altered to 35)

Discussion in '2011-2017 Classic Menswear' started by ericmelton, Feb 3, 2016.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ericmelton

    ericmelton Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    Heavy tweed. Like new condition. I believe this is the Rudy fit. The waist has been let out to 35. They have a 1.5" cuff. Price includes shipping in CONUS (no international shipping).

    Measurements:
    Waist: 35" (let out from 33")
    Rise: 12"
    Thigh: 13"
    Leg opening: 8.5" (1.5" cuff)
    Inseam: 31.5"
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Feb 5, 2016


  2. avsmusic1

    avsmusic1 Distinguished Member

    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    204
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2013
    Did you have the thigh altered?
     


  3. ericmelton

    ericmelton Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    No. The waist was let out and length hemmed. No other alterations
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2016


  4. avsmusic1

    avsmusic1 Distinguished Member

    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    204
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2013
    Thanks. Would you mind double checking the thigh measurement?
     


  5. ericmelton

    ericmelton Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    It's accurate. These are the Rudy fit, which is not as slim cut as most of their pants.
     


  6. avsmusic1

    avsmusic1 Distinguished Member

    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    204
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2013
    Ya I was thinking it looked much lower than spec actually. I thought a 33 was over 13". Is your measurement at the crotch?
     
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2016


  7. ericmelton

    ericmelton Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2016


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by