1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

Epaulet Tweed Rudy Trousers / Pants 33 (altered to 35)

Discussion in '2011-2017 Classic Menswear' started by ericmelton, Feb 3, 2016.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ericmelton

    ericmelton Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    57
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    Heavy tweed. Like new condition. I believe this is the Rudy fit. The waist has been let out to 35. They have a 1.5" cuff. Price includes shipping in CONUS (no international shipping).

    Measurements:
    Waist: 35" (let out from 33")
    Rise: 12"
    Thigh: 13"
    Leg opening: 8.5" (1.5" cuff)
    Inseam: 31.5"
     
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2016
  2. avsmusic1

    avsmusic1 Senior member

    Messages:
    1,120
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2013
    Did you have the thigh altered?
     
  3. ericmelton

    ericmelton Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    57
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    No. The waist was let out and length hemmed. No other alterations
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2016
  4. avsmusic1

    avsmusic1 Senior member

    Messages:
    1,120
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2013
    Thanks. Would you mind double checking the thigh measurement?
     
  5. ericmelton

    ericmelton Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    57
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    It's accurate. These are the Rudy fit, which is not as slim cut as most of their pants.
     
  6. avsmusic1

    avsmusic1 Senior member

    Messages:
    1,120
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2013
    Ya I was thinking it looked much lower than spec actually. I thought a 33 was over 13". Is your measurement at the crotch?
     
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2016
  7. ericmelton

    ericmelton Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    57
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2016
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by