"english" styled suits hit the mall

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by retronotmetro, Aug 17, 2004.

  1. Nick M

    Nick M Senior member

    Messages:
    1,491
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2002
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    Hell, I'd wear it. I have no problem with this trend. Most people are going to ignore it anyway - it's too much work.
    Yes, the whole RLPL/'sartorial' movement is largely a fictitious history to get people to throw out their old clothes and buy new ones, but so what? The clothing of the 1930s, to me, looked nice. The English-style suit, again, to me, looks nice - whether it's a product of history or the figment of a modern designer's imagination. I find it a flattering cut, and so I might buy a few examples of it. I won't throw out my entire wardrobe in favor of it, but I can find some room for it, certainly. If a clothing manufacturer makes clothes that you like, and that are flattering on you, you can hardly be said to be sucked into the marketing hype. If something plainly looks stupid on me, I'm not going to wear it simply because it's in. And besides, did your PDC jeans come in an absolutely pristine dark blue wash? Did you have to wear them for 2 years to get that '2-year' look? No, they came off the hanger that way, because some marketing whiz knew they'd sell more if they looked 'authentic'.. If the English-suit guys are the victim of a marketing experiment, then you are too, surely?
     
  2. A Harris

    A Harris Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    4,582
    Likes Received:
    11
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Well said. Though I think LA Guy will agree with us on this score.
     
  3. Alias

    Alias Senior member

    Messages:
    1,536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2003
    Location:
    Washington DC
    (LabelKing @ 17 Aug. 2004, 6:46) Tacky.
    Hell, I'd wear it.
    So would I. It looks like he's doing everything right in that photo. Hell, even his jacket sleeves don't look too long, a rarity these days.
     
  4. Mike C.

    Mike C. Senior member

    Messages:
    1,528
    Likes Received:
    5
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2002
    Location:
    New York City
    I would never sell. The BR customer is someone who does not like to take fashion risks. They like watered down versions of existing trends, without looking to risque.

    In order for the any type of headwear other than a trucker cap to come back in vogue, it would have to start at the high-end of fashion.
     
  5. A Harris

    A Harris Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    4,582
    Likes Received:
    11
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    About P Diddy, the jacket looks pretty good, but that vest is way too high.
     
  6. LabelKing

    LabelKing Senior member

    Messages:
    25,745
    Likes Received:
    238
    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Location:
    Constantinople
    What I meant was his contrived attempts at a sort of dandyish attitude.

    I would believe that this sort of wardrobe change was inspired by that Bentley man with the umbrellas.

    Besides, that waist needs much more supression, and the armholes aren't high enough. In my opinion.

    I do think he has a pocket watch in the breast pocket.
     
  7. Keith T

    Keith T TWAT Master.

    Messages:
    1,441
    Likes Received:
    905
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Location:
    Texas
    I am for this trend in general...anything that gets more men in suits is a good thing (the 70's rage for leisure suits excepted).  The "Anglophile look" becoming more widely available is not to be feared for this reason; it should also serve as an introduction for many in the younger set to some of the more subtle details that can make a suit more interesting.  I would imagine that when many BR customers think of a suit, they think of the American sack--they find it dull, not attractive, and therefore would not consider themselves "suit wearers".  Nothing to aspire to.

    The differences in cut, in the pockets, the vents, lapels might grab the interest of some of these fellows and lead to some converts.  I say it's all good.

    As for the garb of Mr. Combs, I agree...  

       

    ..but I personally feel this very strange, very strong compulsion to comment on his pocket square, which I just find to be just a little bit too...puffy.





    Stop groaning.  Somebody had to say it.
     
  8. bslo

    bslo Senior member

    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    I don't understand how you can tell from the photo that Diddy's armholes are not cut high enough or that there is not enough waist suppression. Care to elaborate?
     
  9. imageWIS

    imageWIS Senior member

    Messages:
    20,008
    Likes Received:
    97
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    New York City / Buenos Aires
    craptacular: hahahahahaha. [​IMG] Jon.
     
  10. YoungFogey

    YoungFogey Senior member

    Messages:
    112
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
  11. LA Guy

    LA Guy Opposite Santa Staff Member Admin Moderator

    Messages:
    33,789
    Likes Received:
    11,875
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2002
    Location:
    Moscow, Idaho
    No.  I do try to buy the simpler washes in any case and refuse to buy jeans with actual pre-fabricated holes in them, but not because I have an aversion to trendiness.   I do the former because I find that simple styled jeans are more versatile and don't do the latter because I wear my jeans hard, and the holes are come by honestly (I have never deliberated distressed jeans just for that reason.  A couple of months of hardwearing usually do the trick.)  I also like pristine blue jeans - for that I go to A.P.C.

    I have a strong sense of personal style, and because of that, have no problem incorporating trendy things into my wardrobe when and if they appeal to me.  What I object to is people (including people on this forum) who insist that they are not at all influenced by marketing, that their tastes were essentially developed in vacuo, or by their independent discovery of Cary Grant, the Rat Pack, whatever, when I know perfectly well that the fashion industry has been instrumental in bringing these influences and images back into the public's consciousness.

    BTW, I was wearing PDC jeans from the very beginning (my first pair was of a cut that would eventually become the current LTD cut - the denim was terrific, and there was no distressing at all on them), when they were just developing their cuts (some of them would seem awfully high rise in the current climate,) when the tag was in a different font and on a satin rather than coated paper strip, and before the J-stitching was conceived.  And I am currently wearing one of the very first pair of Seven jeans for men produced, so I think that I can safely say that I am generally a trend leader, rather than a trend follower.
     
  12. Brian SD

    Brian SD Moderator

    Messages:
    9,760
    Likes Received:
    122
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2004
    Location:
    Tokyo
    LA Guy, I could see your point perfectly if I had noticed any of these claims that people on this forum gloat about personally acquiring style from said influences prior to the fashion industry's exposure of them. I honestly don't see it. Your overall statement is inarguable, and is easily understood to me by relating to music trends (everyone screaming that they loved Gang of Four before dance punk was cool), but as I said, I just don't see that sort of self-righteousness on this forum. I mean, no one ever posted, "I practically invented the British suit, and now BR is tainting my discovery," or anything near that effect.
     
  13. LA Guy

    LA Guy Opposite Santa Staff Member Admin Moderator

    Messages:
    33,789
    Likes Received:
    11,875
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2002
    Location:
    Moscow, Idaho
    I've never seen any post stating that explicitly, but I have noticed a lot of posts using catchphrases like "classic style" and "timeless design" that I'm not sure many realize have actually been tossed out there by fashion editors. Often in the same posts (or in different posts by the same authors,) I've noticed disparagements of what is perceived to be trendiness. I think that it behooves us to acknowledge how powerful marketing forces are, and to realize that no-one is really immune. Unless you genuinely don't care, and there is no one here that doesn't, you are buying into some form of lifestyle marketing, and it would be nice if there was a general agreement on that point, just so we can put the "classic vs. trendy" argument, and all the myths surrounding it, to rest.

    Rant finished. I promise.
     
  14. Brian SD

    Brian SD Moderator

    Messages:
    9,760
    Likes Received:
    122
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2004
    Location:
    Tokyo
    LA Guy, I could see your point perfectly if I had noticed any of these claims that people on this forum gloat about personally acquiring style from said influences prior to the fashion industry's exposure of them. I honestly don't see it.
    I've never seen any post stating that explicitly, but I have noticed a lot of posts using catchphrases like "classic style" and "timeless design" that I'm not sure many realize have actually been tossed out there by fashion editors. Â Often in the same posts (or in different posts by the same authors,) I've noticed disparagements of what is perceived to be trendiness. Â I think that it behooves us to acknowledge how powerful marketing forces are, and to realize that no-one is really immune. Â Unless you genuinely don't care, and there is no one here that doesn't, you are buying into some form of lifestyle marketing, and it would be nice if there was a general agreement on that point, just so we can put the "classic vs. trendy" argument, and all the myths surrounding it, to rest. Rant finished. Â I promise.
    Like I edited (possibly while you were typing your response), I think your point is inarguable, and that everyone is affected by whom they see, be it in movies, commercials or on the street, and that it is the desire to obtain that lifestyle that drives people to reshape their style. This includes fashion icons that represent the "classic, timeless style," that you pointed out to be a trend, which I agree completely with. A few weeks ago the college newspaper posted results of a survey of the current generation of middle school kids, which showed a stunning amount of apathy and depression amongst the current generation. SDSU so cleverly labelled them generation "don't care." While mostly everyone would say that the war, famine and overall disfunction of the current world is at fault, I think it is mostly a swell in a marketing trend. It's the pouty, depressed, and scantily clad Abercrombie models and other advertisements of similar ilk that glorify a mopey, depressed but extremely sexually active lifestyle. It's not like hardships didn't exist in the 50s (slavery?. ) , yet everyone thinks of it as this glowing, perfect age of American History, which I see as a result of marketing and media (during that era as well as current times).
     
  15. imageWIS

    imageWIS Senior member

    Messages:
    20,008
    Likes Received:
    97
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    New York City / Buenos Aires
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by