EG casuals -- Bamford vs. Wigmore

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by LARon, Sep 20, 2006.

  1. LARon

    LARon Senior member

    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    I'm considering purchasing a pair of EG casuals, and am debating between the Bamford and Wigmore models. How would you describe each in terms of attrractiveness, usefulness and occasion appropriateness, or any other thought that comes to mind.

    Looking forward to your comments. Thanks.
     


  2. DocHolliday

    DocHolliday Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    16,118
    Likes Received:
    1,089
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Location:
    Tombstone
    Personally, I like the sleekness of the Bamford. I don't care for loafers with suits, but I can see these working well with a wide array of more casual clothing.
     


  3. Roger

    Roger Senior member

    Messages:
    1,936
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2005
    Location:
    Vancouver
    LARon, it would help immensely--and get you many more responses--if you were to post pictures of the two shoes in question, instead of relying on forumers to remember the shoes or take the time to look them up in some catalog.
     


  4. von Rothbart

    von Rothbart Senior member

    Messages:
    2,461
    Likes Received:
    7
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    Bamford
    [​IMG]

    Wigmore:
    [​IMG]

    I'd pick Bamford. Wholecut, simple and elegant.
     


  5. texas_jack

    texas_jack Senior member

    Messages:
    10,264
    Likes Received:
    478
    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Location:
    Hobart, IN
    vote for wigmore. the others look too houseshoe-y. Wigmore has just enough detail to make them interesting plus they would work with slacks and jeans. I couldn't see the bamford with jeans.
     


  6. jml90

    jml90 Senior member

    Messages:
    1,595
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Location:
    NEPA!
    Wigmore, I don't like the low vamp on the Bamford
     


  7. luk-cha

    luk-cha Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    4,534
    Likes Received:
    74
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Location:
    Was Sinndom, Now is Rolexdom
    sod it! would buy both![​IMG]
     


  8. pkincy

    pkincy Senior member

    Messages:
    860
    Likes Received:
    13
    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Location:
    San Diego Ca
    sod it! would buy both![​IMG]

    I can understand that thought!

    Perry
     


  9. aportnoy

    aportnoy Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    6,790
    Likes Received:
    656
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Bamford in antique olive...[​IMG]
     


  10. pejsek

    pejsek Senior member

    Messages:
    938
    Likes Received:
    5
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    They're really different shoes. In its essence the Bamford is a modern shoe (as von Rothbart so well puts it: "Wholecut, simple, and elegant"; but where are the wholecuts of yesteryear?), while the Wigmore is a classic Edwardian design having its genesis, I believe, with the old bespoke maker Peal. So it really depends on which sort of approach suits you. They're both gorgeous. I think aportnoy is definitely on to s.thing with his suggestion of antique olive--both of these shoes would really shine with one of the more dramatic EG finishes. The Wigmore has traditionally been done up on a round-toe last, but I think it would look smashing on s.thing a little more square.
     


  11. LARon

    LARon Senior member

    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Excellent responses, all. Thanks a lot; just what I'd hoped for.

    I'm leaning toward the Bamford, but am curious about this notion of olive antiquing? Would that really make it more attractive?

    Is olive even a good color for a shoe? What sort of look does olive convey -- more or less dressy/casual?
     


  12. mussel

    mussel Senior member

    Messages:
    883
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2004
    Add my vote for Bamford. In Edwardian.
     


  13. sammy

    sammy Senior member

    Messages:
    455
    Likes Received:
    23
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    Excellent responses, all. Thanks a lot; just what I'd hoped for.

    I'm leaning toward the Bamford, but am curious about this notion of olive antiquing? Would that really make it more attractive?

    Is olive even a good color for a shoe? What sort of look does olive convey -- more or less dressy/casual?


    EG's antique olive looks almost black. Its a very unique and elegant color. Olive has a complexity and depth that black does not have. When I first saw it, I didn't know it was olive. I have not seen the Bamford in this color, but I think it would be a very cool look. Actually, I plan to get the Bamford without the medallion at the next trunk show.[​IMG]
     


  14. von Rothbart

    von Rothbart Senior member

    Messages:
    2,461
    Likes Received:
    7
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    What's the difference between Bamford and Sussex?

    Sussex
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     


  15. LARon

    LARon Senior member

    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    How ironic you should ask, I posed that very question yesterday to one of the EG salesmen at Saks NYC. He said he'd check into it and get back to me. However, I seem to recall someone suggesting in one of the threads that Bamford is just a new name for the Sussex.

    Will report back when I get confirmation.
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by