Edward Green vs. Gaziano @ Girling (w/pics)

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by tlmusic, Mar 10, 2008.

  1. tlmusic

    tlmusic Senior member

    Messages:
    931
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Gaziano & Girling vs. Edward Green
    [​IMG]

    I thought it might be fun to compare two fine examples of English craftsmanship. Excuse the poor quality pictures. I'm just learning how to post images, and black shoes are really difficult to photograph!

    For comparison we have two pairs of black stitch cap oxfords. Both shoes are marked UK 9 1/2 E.



    Here is the Edward Green Chelsea 202 Last (cost--$975 w/ free shipping) from Sky Shoes in DC.
    [​IMG]



    Next, we have a Gaziano & Girling Oxford GG06 Last (cost 500GBP including shipping-which was approximately $1000 at the time of purchase) ordered directly from Dean Girling.
    [​IMG]



    Note the differences in styling. The G&G shoe (R) has a much more elongated toe cap. At first, I wasn't so sure about the virtues of the elongated toe cap, but I think it looks much better when the shoe is being worn. The Chelsea features a "swan's neck" stitching by the laces.
    [​IMG]


    The Chelsea (above) is 11 7/8" long. The G&G's (below) are longer at 12 1/4".
    [​IMG]


    Note the G&G shoe (in front) has a beautiful beveled waist. This exquisite detail did not really show up in the photos, it is quite striking in person.
    [​IMG]
     


  2. DocHolliday

    DocHolliday Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    16,118
    Likes Received:
    1,088
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Location:
    Tombstone
    How does the fit compare? The G&G looks bigger in general.

    The G&G definitely has a nicer waist.
     


  3. tlmusic

    tlmusic Senior member

    Messages:
    931
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    How does the fit compare? The G&G looks bigger in general.

    The G&G definitely has a nicer waist.


    I have not had a chance to wear the shoes much, but the initial impressions are the G&G's are more comfortable for my feet.

    The G&G's are slightly wider, especially in the toe box, which is contrary to all the stories of G&G making a narrow shoe. Dean Girling told me that the G&G is 1/16" wider than EG 202. I'm not sure how he is measuring. He said that the GG lasts fit closest to the EG 888. I have never been able to try on a EG 888 in my proper size, so I can't comment on that.

    Even though the G&G shoe is longer, I don't have any problem with too much space at the heel, possibly because I have a high instep.
     


  4. FidelCashflow

    FidelCashflow Senior member

    Messages:
    4,328
    Likes Received:
    44
    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    Location:
    Canada
    Nice shoes. I'm jealous you have both.
     


  5. Frittata

    Frittata Senior member

    Messages:
    252
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Location:
    Germany
    For a plain, black business captoe the GG is almost to agressive [​IMG]

    Which last is the GG on? I've never heard of the 06 last ..
     


  6. Eustace Tilley

    Eustace Tilley Senior member

    Messages:
    6,452
    Likes Received:
    306
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2007
    Location:
    New York
    While both are great quality shoes, imo the Edward Green looks much nicer.
     


  7. william

    william Senior member

    Messages:
    1,554
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    While both are great quality shoes, imo the Edward Green looks much nicer.

    +1

    Proportions are more harmonious on the EG. The G&G reminds of the C&J 337.
     


  8. Artisan Fan

    Artisan Fan Suitsupply-sider

    Messages:
    32,350
    Likes Received:
    153
    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2006
    I favor the styling of the EG as well on this one, but there are G&G styles I really love.
     


  9. mafoofan

    mafoofan THE FOO Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    20,840
    Likes Received:
    2,053
    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    I prefer the G&G pair; they look a lot more sculpted. In comparison, the EGs are too much like a pair of pill capsules.
     


  10. Eustace Tilley

    Eustace Tilley Senior member

    Messages:
    6,452
    Likes Received:
    306
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2007
    Location:
    New York
    I prefer the G&G shoes. I think they look a lot more sculpted. In comparison, the EG pair seems too much like a pair of pill capsules.

    Keep in mind that the EG is on the 202, which is hardly their sleekest last. The 888/82 strike a appropriate mean between the sleekness of the G&G and the conservatism of the 202.
     


  11. mafoofan

    mafoofan THE FOO Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    20,840
    Likes Received:
    2,053
    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    Keep in mind that the EG is on the 202, which is hardly their sleekest last. The 888/82 strike a appropriate mean between the sleekness of the G&G and the conservatism of the 202.

    I do like the 888 last a lot better than the 202, so I'm sure it would be a closer call for me if it were the 888 we were looking at. But that doesn't change the fact that I prefer the G&G pair in this particular comparison [​IMG].
     


  12. luk-cha

    luk-cha Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    4,534
    Likes Received:
    74
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Location:
    Was Sinndom, Now is Rolexdom
    I prefer the G&G pair; they look a lot more sculpted. In comparison, the EGs are too much like a pair of pill capsules.

    to me the 202 last looks like it has had it nose chopped off almost orthapedic - i think it is time to retire the 202, in fact while i was in the EG store in london last week they said they dont have any 202's to try and the only shoe they had on the 606 was the Dover might be a sign[​IMG]
     


  13. ColeFieldHouse

    ColeFieldHouse Senior member

    Messages:
    260
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    to me the 202 last looks like it has had it nose chopped off almost orthapedic - i think it is time to retire the 202, in fact while i was in the EG store in london last week they said they dont have any 202's to try and the only shoe they had on the 606 was the Dover might be a sign[​IMG]

    202 looks infinitely better with a medallion. Plain toe, it looks like a stubby ol'AE.
     


  14. luk-cha

    luk-cha Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    4,534
    Likes Received:
    74
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Location:
    Was Sinndom, Now is Rolexdom
    202 looks infinitely better with a medallion. Plain toe, it looks like a stubby ol'AE.

    the pic's of the 202 from the 80's make the last look really nice but these recent pictures seem to to it no favors and it look awfull!
     


  15. tlmusic

    tlmusic Senior member

    Messages:
    931
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Lots of interesting comments...

    I wish I had the time to take some HQ pics of these shoes before the soles get mucked up.

    Looking at the shoes in person, one is impressed that they are well-made, and the details are attractive. People like to take sides, but both brands look pretty darn good.

    Next to an Allen Edmonds (I just tried it), the 202 looks like a beauty queen.

    Viewing both shoes side by side, as they sit on the floor, I have to admit the Chelsea has a much more integrated design. However, the G&G looks somewhat better when actually wearing them. The elongated toecap would probably best suit guys with medium to small feet. If someone had big feet, the long shoe might not balance very well.

    As far as quality goes, both shoes are great, but the G&G exudes something a little special. The attention to detail is a little finer, at least to my non-shoemaker eyes.
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by