archetypal_yuppie
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2010
- Messages
- 2,855
- Reaction score
- 591
In my judgement, C&J's have a heavier build with seemingly thicker leathers and definitely more stiffeners (heel), and slightly lower grade finishing. However the difference in finishing is only notable on close inspection (not visible in the wild).
Except for the C&J Weymouth; the leather on mine wore terribly (washed out in color, pronounced creasing), so I would avoid C&J wholecuts myself. I have no basis to judge whether it's idiosynchratic or systematic.
For the record I have 3 C&Js, ~8 EGs, and I am glad to have the C&Js.
And I still strongly recommend the C&Js if you're collection of proper leather shoes stands at zero.
I think the leather grade and finish is equal, however EG seems to be a touch thicker.
In my judgement, C&J's have a heavier build with seemingly thicker leathers and definitely more stiffeners (heel), and slightly lower grade finishing. However the difference in finishing is only notable on close inspection (not visible in the wild).
Except for the C&J Weymouth; the leather on mine wore terribly (washed out in color, pronounced creasing), so I would avoid C&J wholecuts myself. I have no basis to judge whether it's idiosynchratic or systematic.
For the record I have 3 C&Js, ~8 EGs, and I am glad to have the C&Js.
And I still strongly recommend the C&Js if you're collection of proper leather shoes stands at zero.
Last edited: