Neville Southall
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2019
- Messages
- 4,482
- Reaction score
- 15,312
Mondays...
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Rugged. Love it. What does the 72 last fit like, generally?
Rugged. Love it. What does the 72 last fit like, generally?
Woah. Could have sworn they were on the 72 last.Hey @George Red , these are on 202 last, with wide F fitting. They nicely accommodate my splayed out toes.
They wood of been produced on the old wooden lasts and therefore you would need to half size up.Does anyone know how old EG models compare to the new models?
I have the chance to purchase a model numbered 11000 (ish) and was wondering will the leather /finishing be better. Did the lasts fit differently? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Could anyone roughly name the year of production?
Thanks in advance
Rugged. Love it. What does the 72 last fit like, generally?
How does the instep feel on the 82? I really like the fit of the 82, but the 184's instep is much too low for comfort.For those with experience in loafer sizing.
Say on an 82 last length is fine and width is snug. Is the 184 last narrower than the 82. I have heard the 184 is narrower than the 202 last but does it mean its comparable to 82 or even narrower than the 82.
Sorry I can't be much more help. I haven't owned anything on the 184 in years as it didn’t fit right out of the box so was promptly returned. All I remember was the low vamp putting way too much pressure on my instep.Its snug but nothing too much. With the 82 its perfect besides the ball being a little tight. I couldn’t go any tighter in the ball measurement.
In my arrogant opinion, these are THE shoes to own.