Edward Green Appreciation: Pictures, Info, and Where to Buy

[jischwar]

Rosewood CC?

I think brandy pin grain

 

[puffy]

I think brandy pin grain

This is brandy pin grain, looks differnet: https://www.styleforum.net/threads/...-and-feedback-appreciated.512962/post-8203611

 

[patekman]

It looks like Utah

 

[smoothie1]

Those are definitely Utah.

 

[jischwar]

I stand corrected

 

[puffy]

How about these bad boys!
They arrived today.
Thanks Stefan.
First purchase from Skomaker Dagestad.
I highly recommend them View attachment 1400623

Yum...! Country calf? Which colour?

 

[patekman]

Rosewood

 

[patekman]

I got another pair today!
Any guesses...one hint
They are rare

 

[puffy]

Rosewood

Lovely colour. Is it my old eyes or does it look tan or red in some photos?
Like here it looks red'ish

 

[CLTesquire]

Lovely colour. Is it my old eyes or does it look tan or red in some photos?
Like here it looks red'ish

The rosewood I've seen in person looks like this photo, perhaps a touch lighter. There's definitely red in it and it's an awesome color. Cameras aren't always accurate and different exposures play havoc on color representation. I wouldn't have guessed rosewood @patekman's photo. That almost looks like almond country calf. But...cameras and lighting. Who knows.

 

[andreasky]

I saw several EG models in London grain leather? What are the features of this kind of leather? Is it for winter? For rain? Does it crease a lot? Thanks

 

[ryanluo23]

The less common 32Last Dover

 

[patekman]

How does the 32 compare to the 202

 

[puffy]

How does the 32 compare to the 202

And the 32 and 202 to the 606?

 

[ryanluo23]

And the 32 and 202 to the 606?

@puffy and @patekman

well i personally like the 606 on the Dover best because i love the squarish last with the cheeks and for some reason the 606 always reminds me of a hamster..

the 32 is more uniform and more commonly found in the japanese market... 202 and 606 are more recent and I find the 202 is less cheeky when compared to the 606

therefore in terms of cheekiness 606 > 202 > 32