Dismiss Notice

STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Edward Green Appreciation: Pictures, Info, and Where to Buy

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by Harrydog, Mar 11, 2012.

  1. LS7

    LS7 Senior member

    Messages:
    875
    Likes Received:
    48
    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2009
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    

    I wasn't aware of the Ecton EG model. Will do some further research, thanks.
     


  2. bengal-stripe

    bengal-stripe Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    4,462
    Likes Received:
    887
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2002
    Location:
    London, UK
    


    That's the Ecton

    [​IMG]

    The difference is a set of additional facings (underneath the lacings) which the Carter does have but not the Ecton.
     


  3. michaelvl

    michaelvl Senior member

    Messages:
    381
    Likes Received:
    103
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2009
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    The Ecton's are different to the RL Carters, here is a pic of a pair of Ecton's (not mine).
    The Ecton's are basically a 3 eyelet version of the Dover, without the heel counter and with a single sole.

    [​IMG]
     


  4. michaelvl

    michaelvl Senior member

    Messages:
    381
    Likes Received:
    103
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2009
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    

    Thanks
     


  5. Pliny

    Pliny Senior member

    Messages:
    3,899
    Likes Received:
    8,141
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009

    damn, some nice shoes rite there, thanks for posting





    Like these too- they seem to work quite well without the heel counter.
     


  6. Burton

    Burton Senior member

    Messages:
    1,695
    Likes Received:
    227
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2010
    

    Not bad wtihout the heel counter but I prefer them with . . .
     


  7. 89826

    89826 Senior member

    Messages:
    595
    Likes Received:
    37
    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2006
    Location:
    Santa Monica
    EG E width is NOT equal to an American D. At least in EG's view, and from my experience also. How can you know for sure? There is only one width printed on the inside, but two lengths. It is true that for many, if not nearly all, British makers, an E does equal a US D. C&J is a good example.

    All of my Greens are marked D, and that is my US width also.

    Of course you should choose the fit you like. Green's philosophy is that shoes should fit snugly in width, like a slipper. Snugger than many Americans are used to.
     
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2012


  8. gsugsu

    gsugsu Senior member

    Messages:
    894
    Likes Received:
    111
    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    It does come down to fit. I wear 8.5/9E which I find to be equivalent to a US D (almost). But it does come down to the last and how it fits you.

    I believe that there are some posts here in this thread stating that EG shoe width sizing is the same in the UK and US. I take that to mean an EG shoe with the UK/US size labeled E at BB indicates a UK E. But if you require a UK D (narrow) then I see what you are driving at.

    Others may care to comment or correct my interpretation.
     
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2012


  9. 89826

    89826 Senior member

    Messages:
    595
    Likes Received:
    37
    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2006
    Location:
    Santa Monica
    Gsu,
    But it would also indicate a US E, no?
     


  10. hendrix

    hendrix Ill-proportioned

    Messages:
    9,507
    Likes Received:
    3,727
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    

    Yes, the stormwelt/split reverse is quite different from goiserer and bentivegna. It's essentially just a normal welt with a lip running around the outside.

    Funnily enough, if you look at Alden's storm welt, they have faux stitching on the top split lip, which makes it look like it's Bentivegna construction, when it's really just a normal welt with a lip (i.e. the stitching does not run through the upper to the insole). I think this is called "fudge" stitching.
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2012


  11. Burton

    Burton Senior member

    Messages:
    1,695
    Likes Received:
    227
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2010
    

    I think the EG "E" width is much closer to a U.S. "D" width. Maybe a "D+" but certainly not an U.S. "E" and the EG "D" is narrower than a U.S. "D."
     


  12. PhiloVance

    PhiloVance Senior member

    Messages:
    1,724
    Likes Received:
    148
    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    So the Brendon might actually be more of an Ecton boot than a Dover boot . . .

     


  13. AlexE

    AlexE Senior member

    Messages:
    1,001
    Likes Received:
    225
    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2009
    Location:
    Munich, Germany
    

    All EG's I have seen show both the UK and US length and a single width, e.g. 10.5/11B. Therefore, I would conclude that they do not have a width coding specifically for the US.
     


  14. bengal-stripe

    bengal-stripe Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    4,462
    Likes Received:
    887
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2002
    Location:
    London, UK
    

    Comparing the picture of the 'Brendon' (which I've never seen before) to my four eyelets 'Halifax' (which is the boot version of the 'Dover'), I believe it is actually the same boot (same pattern) with just a different arrangement of the eyelets.

    At one time, EG did offer the 'Halifax' with five eyelets. Again it was the identical pattern, just the eyelets were a bit closer spaced to get five pairs into that same space. Judging by the picture, the 'Brendon' might be the five eyelets 'Halifax' version with the bottom two let off. The eyelets look closer together than on my four eyelets version.

    Here is the five and the four eyelet version of the ;Halifax:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Actually my mistake, looking at the pictures again, there is a difference in the pattern between 'Brendon' and 'Halifax'. The bottom corner, where the lowest eyelet sits is cut off on the 'Brandon'.
     
    Last edited: Sep 9, 2012


  15. cwh812

    cwh812 Senior member

    Messages:
    572
    Likes Received:
    44
    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    

    I'm not sure about that. I would take the heel counter as being more definitive measure of the extrapolation of a shoe to a boot, rather than the number of eyelets. I think the number of eyelets from a shoe to boot conversion is always something that may change because the lacing and elongation up the ankle is one of the main components of the difference. I think it is safe to say, however, if anything, it is a mixture of both.
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by