1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

Dubai

Discussion in 'Social Life, Food & Drink, Travel' started by kalra2411, May 28, 2004.

  1. j

    j Senior member Admin

    Messages:
    14,914
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2002
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Interesting indeed, but I was of the impression that the House of Commons / House of Lords model of Parliament was the model on which our Congress was based. I don't know how I'd feel about having an entire house of women above the house of men, but I'm sure we'd have been pulled into less wars over the years.
     
  2. Steve B.

    Steve B. Senior member

    Messages:
    10,272
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2002
    Location:
    San Antonio
    I think that's the common perception, but another view is that the Founding Fathers wanted to get away from British customs as far as possible.

    I saw the Iroquois assertion in one of those offbeat books I read- "I", by David Hawkins. The women thing I heard from an Indian chief who gave a talk I attended earlier this year. Apparently there were 16 separate petitions that needed to be filed and approved before a tribe could go to war. If the men still persisted, the mothers of the combatants ran onto the battlefield, forcing the men to kill their own mothers before each other.

    Don't know if these guys are blowing smoke or not, but it's a pretty interesting idea, isn't it? Bet it would stop a lot of testosterone fueled wars.
     
  3. Steve B.

    Steve B. Senior member

    Messages:
    10,272
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2002
    Location:
    San Antonio
    A 21st century tea party.
     
  4. vero_group

    vero_group Senior member

    Messages:
    506
    Joined:
    May 16, 2003
    Why, thank you.
    Naw, the opportunities are so "there" it's amazing. What has changed is the attitudes of Americans. We used to be a nation of entrepreneurs, capitalists, small business people. Now it seems people want to be coddled by their employers and the governments, local, state and federal. It's all about entitlements now. We still have more opportunities than the citizens of other countries; we've just gotten fat (literally) and complacent. I realize that's a generalization, but the WWII generation would likely agree with me maybe?
    The solution is to not be a fatalist -- stop thinking that "the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer." If you think it so, it will be so. Some 'rich' (if you must be so "classist" [​IMG] ) DO get poorer, and some 'poor' (ditto) DO get richer. Saying the cliche is too easy of a cop-out in my book. You can get rich and you can get poor. Much of it has to do with the decisions you make in life. Now you guys probably don't agree with me anymore. [​IMG]
     
  5. j

    j Senior member Admin

    Messages:
    14,914
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2002
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I still agree.

    I think the only solution is really to realize that realistically you will not make a difference in the political system of this country, make the best for yourself and try to have a good life keeping as much of your income and material resources as possible and putting as much of it toward causes you consider good, and ensure a comfortable life for your future generations, while taking time to impart upon them as much of your experience as possible. That's all anyone can really aspire to unless he is born into the proper connections.
     
  6. vero_group

    vero_group Senior member

    Messages:
    506
    Joined:
    May 16, 2003
    In my book, a fat cat making $500,000 a year is "rich" due to the high income. But, he or she may not be "wealthy" based on his or her net worth (assets minus debt). Many people making $500,000 a year spend it all on crap and have little of long-term value to show for it. These are the "high lifers". They don't value the money they make very highly, so they waste it all on crap instead of investing it to build true wealth.

    Those concerned about "bling" are posers. They are not really rich or wealthy by most definitions, but they sure want to convince you and themselves that they are rich or wealthy. They are "All Hat and No Cattle" as we say here in Texas. These include many of the people you see driving around in leased Mercedeses and BMWs in your neighborhood. That's a big expense going out of the bank account every month.

    Don't worry, there are still Americans out there that believe in honor, valiance, and hard work. You have to turn off the TV or radio and go out and look for them to find them, but they are out there.
     
  7. NavyStyles

    NavyStyles Senior member

    Messages:
    521
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2002
    Location:
    New Orleans, LA
    Steve, Was there another reason that the women's votes overruled the men's votes? Or was it mainly to prevent unnecessary wars? Just curious. CTG, Good point about our society becoming the "bling" generation. It's pretty sad. I'm sure y'all have each seen at least one episode of VH-1's "Fabulous Life of <Insert Star of the Moment>." Typical average viewers see what money can buy ($50,000 pinky rings, a hotel room for your dog, professional crotch shampooing, etc), but they lose sight of the hard work and dedication it takes the average talentless person (which most celebrities are, anyway) to make it. On top of all that, we now have Jessica Simpson encouraging every little girl in America to think, "Gee, mommy, when I grow up, I hope I'm a ditz."
     
  8. Steve B.

    Steve B. Senior member

    Messages:
    10,272
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2002
    Location:
    San Antonio
    Navy:

    Main reason I believe was the war thing. However, I was also led to believe that the Indians revered women as extensions of Mother Earth, more connected to nature and its natural cycles which were the bases for Native American spirituality. This is perhaps why they felt women could make better decisions.
     
  9. NavyStyles

    NavyStyles Senior member

    Messages:
    521
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2002
    Location:
    New Orleans, LA
    Makes sense. Thanks for the information.
     
  10. Ambulance Chaser

    Ambulance Chaser Senior member

    Messages:
    9,790
    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2002
    Location:
    Washington, D.C.
    Sounds good to me. Â Instead of invading Iraq, America and the "coalition of the willing" would make fun of Iraq behind its back until it developed an eating disorder. Â [​IMG]
     
  11. NavyStyles

    NavyStyles Senior member

    Messages:
    521
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2002
    Location:
    New Orleans, LA
    hahahahaha. "Operation Malicious Gossip is ready for launch"
     
  12. Steve B.

    Steve B. Senior member

    Messages:
    10,272
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2002
    Location:
    San Antonio
    Sexist Pigs... Â [​IMG] Actually, a duel between Saddam and George W. might have been more apropos. Winner gets the oil.
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by