1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

Drug Use at Summer Camp

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by dopey, Aug 12, 2013.

  1. dopey

    dopey Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    14,577
    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2006
    What do you think of this letter (slightly modified) just received:
    This has happened in the past and I think the counselor had been rehired the next year (not necessarily the one who was the subject of this letter). Some parents of counselors have complained that the rule is too harsh and their kids are getting tarred with a black mark.
     
    Last edited: Aug 12, 2013
  2. zarathustra

    zarathustra Senior member

    Messages:
    2,591
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    

    I think this letter subjects the camp to potential liability. There is no need to explain why a person is let go, particularly in this instance where nothing was done to jeopardize the well being of the children.

    All that needed to be said was:

    Dear parents,

    This morning x and the camp parted ways. We are unable to comment on the circumstances surrounding her departure for various legal reasons, but we assure you at no point was the safety of any child compromised. ___ was in bunk x. There remains 2 counselors in that bunk and the division head ____ so there remains plenty of supervision.

    Please understand that we cannot discuss the particulars of this, but felt it necessary to inform you in the change of circumstances and assure you that your child's safety and well being is of the utmost concern here.
     
  3. Douglas

    Douglas Senior member

    Messages:
    14,658
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Purseforum
    Truth is an absolute defense against defamation, so if someone complained about a "black mark" the case would get tossed on the presentation of a positive drug test.

    I think the liability would be greater if something happened to a kid in the camp and it was found that counselors were failing drug tests and being quietly shown the door without notifying parents. Catholic church might be an interesting parallel.

    Rules are rules, the counselors know them, if they want to smoke out they should find another job.
     
  4. dopey

    dopey Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    14,577
    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2006
    I would have left out the name of the particular counselor that was fired from the group email (though I would have said who is still in the bunk).
     
  5. dopey

    dopey Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    14,577
    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2006
    lol Just checked her twitter feed. Lots of RTs from Classy Stoner @ClassyWeed. Also from Life as a Stoner @LifeAsStoner. Smart girl. Way to get sympathy over the injustice of it all. Surprised the camp didn't bother to check first.
    At least her last tweet was "the things id do to rewind"
    Wisdom comes, even if it comes late.
     
  6. Douglas

    Douglas Senior member

    Messages:
    14,658
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Purseforum
    

    yes, this would probably be more prudent, you're right. I guess it didn't register as strongly for me given that you had already edited out the name, so it didn't stand out for me.
     
  7. gomestar

    gomestar Senior member

    Messages:
    19,383
    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Location:
    NYC
    there is a reason why my actual name is not part of my twitter feed and it's not connected to Facebook in any way.

    no stoner stuff though
     
    Last edited: Aug 12, 2013
  8. globetrotter

    globetrotter Senior member

    Messages:
    20,605
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Location:
    greater chicago
    if they had sent out an email and said ";so and so was caught smoking pot on camp, so we had to shoot her, sorry for the inconvenience" it wouldn't bother me.


    she's been working there for 10 years, which means she's at least 26-27, she should know better. I hate the idea that everyone under the age of 40 should be indulged in their shit because they are kids. she knew the rules, she broke them. she is a role model for kids. I don't need my kids coming home from camp with a stoner hero.


    honestly, not a whole lot against drugs, if this was an office worker in a business without a drug policy, I'd say she has every right to do what ever she wants in her off time.
     
  9. dopey

    dopey Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    14,577
    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2006
    She hadn't been working there for ten years. She had been there as a camper and counselor for ten years (combined). She is probably nineteen or so - i.e., just finished her freshman or sophomore year at college (that is typical for camp counselors and how old I was when I did it). Either way, I agree she should have been more responsible. But if you look at her twitter feed, it would be hard not to see this coming - half the posts are about weed.
     
    Last edited: Aug 12, 2013
  10. globetrotter

    globetrotter Senior member

    Messages:
    20,605
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Location:
    greater chicago
    also, my son goes to a jewish camp, about 1/3 of the kids from my synagogue go to that camp, to some extent or another. maybe 1/3 of those end up counselors. every one of the pros in my synagogue (2 rabbis, cantor, head of education, a few teachers) spend part of the summer at that camp. maybe 5 other adults in the community have a work/business connection with the camp.


    if somebody suddenly disappeared from camp, you can bet your ass it would be a huge topic of discussion. whether she "resigned" in the middle of the summer or was fired. if it was a counselor related to my son, my wife would call the head of the camp, probably, or we'd ask him at the high holidays. I'd say that this was probably a preemptive thing, so avoid discussion. also, if this were my camp, the social shame element would be so draconian that it would probably result in a drug free camp for a few years
     
  11. globetrotter

    globetrotter Senior member

    Messages:
    20,605
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Location:
    greater chicago
    

    my bad.

    that does suck, but my position stands.
     
  12. zarathustra

    zarathustra Senior member

    Messages:
    2,591
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    

    It isn't just defamation. Every employer knows you do not comment on personnel issues publicly.

    You also miss the bigger picture. Even if the camp did not actually violate any laws or actually incur any liability this letter, doing this in this manner opened them selves up to litigation. Whether they win or lose is irrelevant--- they still have to pay the attorneys.
     
  13. Douglas

    Douglas Senior member

    Messages:
    14,658
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Purseforum
    I am an employer, and we are being sued over a termination, so I am acutely, even painfully aware of the pitfalls of talking about personnel issues. Even when there is little or no case, and you have to pay the attorneys.

    But in some cases, you have to talk about it. Particularly when the other choice (not talking about it) may also open you up to litigation. As in the scenario I proposed - if something happens to a kid and it comes out that the camp has been "covering up drug use at the camp ZOMG!" there's a risk to NOT being forthright.

    I'll grant that naming the employee was not smooth - I've already conceded as much.

    Bottom line: there's practically no way a 19-year-old potsmoker or their parents is going to bring a suit over this, so we're splitting hairs to begin with. What are the damages? A few weeks of summer pay? As we're talking about a summer camp, the naivety of whoever sent the letter is pretty understandable/excusable.

    This is not a big deal.
     
  14. zarathustra

    zarathustra Senior member

    Messages:
    2,591
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    







    Under your scenario, I do not see how you make the logical leap to a cover-up. It is only a cover-up if there is knowledge and no immediate action is taken. Here an employee was fired for cause immediately after the camp was advised of such cause. No cover up by not discussing personnel issues, particularly when they are saying it was during off hours. There is absolutely no benefit to disclosing this-- you have now given ammunition to any plaintiffs' attorney. Any plaintiffs lawyer worth their salt will be able to turn this into a cover-up at a den of iniquity.

    My point is that nothing is ever a big deal until it is. That is the problem. My former apartment building sent a letter like this about a doorman in the building. Guess who was not only back at his job back at his job a few months later, but also received a nice settlement? ( THANKS UNION ATTYS!!!) It is always the situations where you think nothing will happen, that it does IME.
     
  15. Harold falcon

    Harold falcon Senior member

    Messages:
    27,420
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    Location:
    NE PA
    There are people who don't smoke weed at camp?
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by