STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I thought overcoat supposed to have a chest pocket, yes?Originally Posted by mussel
It might benefit from a pocket since there is such an expanse of fabric there (esp. because of the fly front)Originally Posted by j
I don't know if you're trying to make a point, but Boyer's coat is made of patterned fabric, which doesn't look nearly as monolithic as the plain camel fabric of the one in the picture.Originally Posted by j
My point is that overcoats do not require a breast pocket, as would a suitcoat. Many classic styles never had them.Originally Posted by Tomasso
I've even seen suits without them that I quite liked.Originally Posted by DocHolliday
Yikes! I could personally never buy a sport coat or suit that lacked a breast pocket. I'd feel somewhat naked without a place to put my glasses or linen.Originally Posted by Jovan
John Steed/Patrick Macnee was fond of the no-pocket look....Originally Posted by DocHolliday