1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

Do you like fur?

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by ernest, Apr 11, 2005.

  1. nightowl6261a

    nightowl6261a Senior member

    Messages:
    1,457
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Location:
    Atlanta
    This is a great point and relays another great point, if we did not let the cow eat so much and get big and fat, then we would be killing it at an earlier age and therefore have better meat, Veal...better softer more supple shoes, because everyone here has to admit that calf skin feels so much better wrapped around your foot than does those hard hide Florsheims.
    Can you imagine if we had to rely on potato skins for shoes instead of that fine Prada leather? [​IMG]
     
  2. LabelKing

    LabelKing Senior member

    Messages:
    25,745
    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Location:
    Constantinople
    I think fur is a lovely material for coats, etc.

    And I also think PETA is a terroristic entity.
     
  3. jamesbond

    jamesbond Senior member

    Messages:
    1,570
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    Location:
    New England
    i tend to agree, allthough i do not wear fur i am a capitalist and understand that any company who produces fur so long as there is a demand is not going to stop just because of PETA.

    did anyone see the article on Anna Wintor (editor of vogue) getting a pie in the face from a PETA person, right in the front row of a fashion show. the funny thing is that it was a tofu pie.
     
  4. thelakes

    thelakes Active Member

    Messages:
    44
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2004
    That statement about the cattle sucking up resources is complete (pardon the pun) bullshit. I come from a farming background. Cattle are grazed out on pretty much unfarmable land and the alfalfa and feed corn is grown in climates not really conducive to other crop types. You can swing by my familys ranch in South Dakota and argue about it if you want.
     
  5. LA Guy

    LA Guy Opposite Santa Staff Member Admin Moderator

    Messages:
    33,456
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2002
    Location:
    Moscow, Idaho
    Thanks j... I think...

    Also, I believe that this thread belongs more properly in the ernest moderated "farmer pimp" forum rather than the streetwear forum.
     
  6. ernest

    ernest Senior member

    Messages:
    2,564
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2004
    Location:
    PARIS
    You don't seem to be really shocked by these films, strange.
     
  7. VMan

    VMan Senior member

    Messages:
    5,103
    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2003
    I think the main issue here is not using the animals for their products, but rather the way that they are housed and killed. True - animals are a renewable resource, but you also have to remember that you are taking the life of a living thing. The difference between hunting and the behavior seen on the video is that most hunters will take a shot at the vital organs or a head shot and get a clean kill, rather than knocking an animal unconscious, cutting off it's limbs, and skinning it while still half-alive.

    Personally, I'm not a huge fan of fur (though I do have a pair of soft rabbit fur-lined leather gloves, and a shearling coat - but I consider that to be leather). To me it's overly glamorous and showy - very flaunty and unnecessary. Unless you live in Siberia. But that's just my opinion.

    I guess my hippie-ness has been exposed on the forum, don't hold it against me.

    No offense was meant in the above post, as I said it's just my opinion.
     
  8. Fabienne

    Fabienne Senior member

    Messages:
    2,030
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2004
    In the Canadian video I saw, the baby seals were in the wild, the men hunting them were so eager to get to the next seal before it got away, that they did not always kill the animal upon striking it once with some sort of club. They certainly never turned back to check.
     
  9. Demeter

    Demeter Senior member

    Messages:
    229
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Location:
    Canada
    Seriously.
     
  10. JLibourel

    JLibourel Senior member

    Messages:
    8,602
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    (JLibourel @ April 11 2005,15:54) For some reason I couldn't access the video. It seems to me that the number of pelts required to make garments is greatly hyped in many cases on that site. Thirty wolf pelts for one coat? Maybe if King Kong heads north. Eight mountain lion pelts for one coat? (Didn't think they really were much good for fur, being rather short haired.) How do you get fur off a sable antelope? Who the hell wears opposum fur--the grubby looking things. Let's look at the positive side of fur. It is very eco-friendly in some ways. Furbearing mammals are a readily renewable resource. Many of them are abundant enough to be pests--nutria in the American South and beaver that are making a strong comeback in many places, for example. If fur is a sustainable cash crop, it is an incentive for preserving wetlands and other wild areas. Trapping and harvesting fur is often an important source of income to native/indigenous peoples. Contrast this with the ecological damage wrought by sheep, my wool wearing friends, or cattle, all you of who wear leather shoes, or the destruction of wild habitat to raise cotton or flax. A consistent philosophy toward animals is probably an impossibility. We sanction hunting but severly punish dogfighting--go figure. Unless you either are strict vegan and believe that animals have equal rights and equities with humans or go to the other extreme and hold that society should impose no standards whatsoever on how animals should be treated (anti-cruelty laws, etc.)--and both these extremes are unacceptable to normal decent people--we are going to remain inconsistent. Frankly, I lo-o-o-ve fur when it is adorning a sexy young woman (quality fur, anyway--sable, mink, etc.)...or even a sexy middle-aged woman, for that matter. Fortunately, my wife doesn't care for fur...which is just as well. The only way I could ever festoon her in sable is by winning a high-dollar lottery.
    I think the main issue here is not using the animals for their products, but rather the way that they are housed and killed. Â True - animals are a renewable resource, but you also have to remember that you are taking the life of a living thing. Â The difference between hunting and the behavior seen on the video is that most hunters will take a shot at the vital organs or a head shot and get a clean kill, rather than knocking an animal unconscious, cutting off it's limbs, and skinning it while still half-alive. Personally, I'm not a huge fan of fur (though I do have a pair of soft rabbit fur-lined leather gloves, and a shearling coat - but I consider that to be leather). Â To me it's overly glamorous and showy - very flaunty and unnecessary. Â Unless you live in Siberia. Â But that's just my opinion. I guess my hippie-ness has been exposed on the forum, don't hold it against me. No offense was meant in the above post, as I said it's just my opinion.
    I think that if some animals are killed and skinned in an inhumane manner for the sake of their fur, that does not morally condemn the practice of raising or harvesting furbearing mammals for their pelts. Obviously, I cannot condone inflicting unnecessary suffering on animals, but some aspects of this business strike me as curious. What possible advantage is there to maiming and skinning a stunned and possibly semi-conscious animal as opposed to a dead one? Moreover, many animals ranched for their fur--fox and mink, in particular--can bite like hell. Would you want try skinning an animal that might revive and sink some very sharp teeth into your hand? In brief, I don't see extreme cruelty as a necessary concommitant of the fur business. A quick, crushing blow to the head is probably as easy a death as we can inflict on an animal, except maybe for some kind of injection. As to the moral superiority of hunting over harvesting fur with the "quick, instantaneous kill" of the hunter, isn't this obviated by the fact that every hunting season enormous numbers of birds and mammals are only wounded and escape to be pulled down by predators or die painful, lingering deaths? And I am at least an occasional hunter. As I commented in my original post, coming up with a consistent philosophy toward the treatment of animals is an extremely difficult one unless one takes a radical, extremist position that most of us are unwilling to adopt.
     
  11. ernest

    ernest Senior member

    Messages:
    2,564
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2004
    Location:
    PARIS
    I guess not torturing animals for nothing is not an extremist position...
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by