Do you know martial art? What kind? What Level?

Discussion in 'Social Life, Food & Drink, Travel' started by Soph, Aug 7, 2006.

  1. LA Guy

    LA Guy Opposite Santa Staff Member Admin Moderator

    Messages:
    34,598
    Likes Received:
    12,141
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2002
    Location:
    Moscow, Idaho
    Your friend is just thick. A very good friend of mine (we've known each other since I was in grade 5, and he in 4, I was just at his wedding, and my brother was his best man) is at that level in Aikido, but he has no illusions about its effectiveness. He does it because he enjoys the body mechanics involved.

    We both started off learning a traditional style, but from an old school guy from Hong Kong, from back in the day when disciples of different schools would regularly call each other out, and you had to prove that your style worked. So a lot of the techniques we learned were pretty practical, and there was a lot of full contact drilling, against resisting opponents.

    We went on different paths, mostly due to our temperaments - I did a lot of hard, external styles as well as some BJJ, and he focussed on Aikido. His mastery of Aikido (we both started in high school, and are in our early thirties now) is far superior to my skill in anything, and he is naturally a better athlete than I will ever be, but in a free sparring match, I beat him pretty much every time. He invariably reverts to hard techniques, because Aikido is not really useful against, say, boxing, where you never commit to the punch to full extension the way an aikidoika assumes an attacker will, nor is it really useful in a standing clinch or on the ground.

    He says (and it seems plausible) that aikido is effectively only if the opponent is attacking without thought of retaliation, and not in a fighting situation. Maybe we can all agree on that?



    one story that I love is having a talk with a friend of mine who was a black belt in akido- he had been studying for maybe 10 years at that time, including summers in a camp in japan, and maybe 3 times a week, but he had only ever studied akido. he had good stamina, but no real power, and was about 130 pounds. we got into a discussion, that was similar to your discussion with your cousin - he claimed that his training was such that I couldn't make him move back over a certain line. I was just a little shorter than him, but I was a great deal more powerful and heavy - and in a matter of maybe a seond and a half, without having to strike him, I had him pinned against a wall 20 feet behind where he was standing. it was almost as though I had changed his religion - he couldn't comprehend that all of this training hadn't achieved the results he wanted. several months later, we were walking down the street in a gay neighborhood, and a car drove by and called us "fags" - he took offense and ran after the car, catching them at the next light. what the fuck was going through his pointy little head, I have no idea, but when I cought up with them, he was getting the shit kicked out of him by 3 or 4 guys. I had the advantage of coming from behind them, and was able to get him away from there without to much trouble. but it was the same type of thing - he was sure that he would have been able to take on these guys, and maybe if they were all wearing pajamas and barefoot, and followed his rules, he would have shown them a thing of two.
     


  2. mkk

    mkk Senior member

    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2004
    There's also Kalarippayattu
     


  3. Nonk

    Nonk Senior member

    Messages:
    752
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Exactly.

    My father, a man who was no stranger to fights, legal or otherwise, armed and unarmed (I think he actually had an uncle who was a bare knuckle prize fighter) told me that grabbing testicles, eye gouging and the starting handle from a 1930's Ford are all useful techniques.

    I prefer to run away these days myself.
     


  4. globetrotter

    globetrotter Senior member

    Messages:
    20,605
    Likes Received:
    390
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Location:
    greater chicago
    Your friend is just thick. A very good friend of mine (we've known each other since I was in grade 5, and he in 4, I was just at his wedding, and my brother was his best man) is at that level in Aikido, but he has no illusions about its effectiveness. He does it because he enjoys the body mechanics involved.

    We both started off learning a traditional style, but from an old school guy from Hong Kong, from back in the day when disciples of different schools would regularly call each other out, and you had to prove that your style worked. So a lot of the techniques we learned were pretty practical, and there was a lot of full contact drilling, against resisting opponents.

    We went on different paths, mostly due to our temperaments - I did a lot of hard, external styles as well as some BJJ, and he focussed on Aikido. His mastery of Aikido (we both started in high school, and are in our early thirties now) is far superior to my skill in anything, and he is naturally a better athlete than I will ever be, but in a free sparring match, I beat him pretty much every time. He invariably reverts to hard techniques, because Aikido is not really useful against, say, boxing, where you never commit to the punch to full extension the way an aikidoika assumes an attacker will, nor is it really useful in a standing clinch or on the ground.

    He says (and it seems plausible) that aikido is effectively only if the opponent is attacking without thought of retaliation, and not in a fighting situation. Maybe we can all agree on that?


    I would like to thiink that that much training has to help, if you mix it with something harder - I think that if my friend (actually, ex friend, and yes, he was thick, but that is another story) - were to add what he has with some boxing or MT, he might be able to apply all of those years of balance and concentration to something useful. just a thought.
     


  5. mizanation

    mizanation Senior member

    Messages:
    927
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    i seem to be making the same point over and over again. one more time.

    sprawling drills with out a partner trains an actual movement and energy used in real combat. push hands and forms does not do this.

    i have seen many, many fights. i've sparred countless hours, with and without protection, with and without rules (back when i didn't know any better). i have NEVER seen push hands energy ever in a fight. no one is going to stand square in front of you and place their hands and forearms lightly against yours in a fight. if you think this exercise helps you block punches, you are misleading yourself. i haven't even seen trapping in a fight. chi-sau just doesn't happen in real life, man.

    i have a very open mind. all my life i have been searching for and learning different martial arts from all over the u.s., to japan, to russia. i am not disputing the health benefits of bagua, hsing-i, tai-chi, and chi-gung--those benefits have been clinically demonstrated. i am not saying that those arts do not have a beautiful history and look very graceful. they do.

    but to say that practicing those arts will make you an effective fighter is not true. i am not trying to be a dick. i just don't like seeing people get a false sense of security in their art--whether it's internal chinese arts or even BJJ. it's very dangerous.

    it's not about whether these styles work for me or not. i am saying that for a style to be effective, it shouldn't work for only some people. it should just work.

    i do not count hearsay about old masters being invicible as valid proof. i don't count demonstrations of strength and power as valid proof. the proof is in actual combat, and fortunately, we've seen internal arts put to the test in no-rules setting. the results were not pretty.
     


  6. mizanation

    mizanation Senior member

    Messages:
    927
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    We went on different paths, mostly due to our temperaments - I did a lot of hard, external styles as well as some BJJ, and he focussed on Aikido. His mastery of Aikido (we both started in high school, and are in our early thirties now) is far superior to my skill in anything, and he is naturally a better athlete than I will ever be, but in a free sparring match, I beat him pretty much every time. He invariably reverts to hard techniques, because Aikido is not really useful against, say, boxing, where you never commit to the punch to full extension the way an aikidoika assumes an attacker will, nor is it really useful in a standing clinch or on the ground.

    He says (and it seems plausible) that aikido is effectively only if the opponent is attacking without thought of retaliation, and not in a fighting situation. Maybe we can all agree on that?


    agreed. thank you.
     


  7. globetrotter

    globetrotter Senior member

    Messages:
    20,605
    Likes Received:
    390
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Location:
    greater chicago
    i seem to be making the same point over and over again. one more time.

    sprawling drills with out a partner trains an actual movement and energy used in real combat. push hands and forms does not do this.

    i have seen many, many fights. i've sparred countless hours, with and without protection, with and without rules (back when i didn't know any better). i have NEVER seen push hands energy ever in a fight. no one is going to stand square in front of you and place their hands and forearms lightly against yours in a fight. if you think this exercise helps you block punches, you are misleading yourself. i haven't even seen trapping in a fight. chi-sau just doesn't happen in real life, man.

    i have a very open mind. all my life i have been searching for and learning different martial arts from all over the u.s., to japan, to russia. i am not disputing the health benefits of bagua, hsing-i, tai-chi, and chi-gung--those benefits have been clinically demonstrated. i am not saying that those arts do not have a beautiful history and look very graceful. they do.

    but to say that practicing those arts will make you an effective fighter is not true. i am not trying to be a dick. i just don't like seeing people get a false sense of security in their art--whether it's internal chinese arts or even BJJ. it's very dangerous.

    it's not about whether these styles work for me or not. i am saying that for a style to be effective, it shouldn't work for only some people. it should just work.

    i do not count hearsay about old masters being invicible as valid proof. i don't count demonstrations of strength and power as valid proof. the proof is in actual combat, and fortunately, we've seen internal arts put to the test in no-rules setting. the results were not pretty.



    so, M, let me summarize - you don't like traditional styles, and you don't like styles that were developed by militaries. you do like sport combat type styles. that sum it up pretty well?
     


  8. JBZ

    JBZ Senior member

    Messages:
    2,281
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Physical and mental toughness are very important, not as abstract concepts, but as a real ability to carry on when tired, bleeding and in pain.

    I've never studied a martial art or other defense/fighting system (I've thought about Krav, but, unfortunately, I don't have the time). However, the above seems to be a good point. Obviously, fighting skill, training, and athletic ability always factor into the probable winner of a fight. However, I think there's something to be said for guys (and gals) with a high pain tolerance. People who can take a punch or two and deal with the pain while carrying on and remaining somewhat composed definitely have an advantage in combat. Regardless of how good you are at fighting, if you make it a habit, you're going to get hit from time to time, and you're going to have to be able to respond to this.
     


  9. Gradstudent78

    Gradstudent78 Senior member

    Messages:
    2,309
    Likes Received:
    18
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2003
    Location:
    Chicago
    I've used my training to deflect punches before the one time I've gotten into a real self defense situation. I know people who have used their training in real self defense situation. I also know cops you I have trained with that have used their training in arrest situations. For me and for those people the training we used worked.


    All sports competitions have some level of rules. You shouldn't make the mistake of equating such compeitions with combat, they are not the same.
     


  10. mizanation

    mizanation Senior member

    Messages:
    927
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    so, M, let me summarize - you don't like traditional styles, and you don't like styles that were developed by militaries. you do like sport combat type styles. that sum it up pretty well?

    when i say "traditional" i mean a style that doesn't focus in someway on 100% alive training (so maybe i should say "non-alive" martial arts). alive training meaning training with a 100% resisting opponent with as minimal restrictions as possible. point sparring does NOT fall into this. chi-sau or push hands does NOT fall into this. bjj rolling does, judo randori does, wrestling does, full contact sparring with protection does.

    that being said, the styles that i mentioned that i like ALL have ancient roots. judo and bjj come from japanese ju-jitsu which has been around for ages in japan. boxing and wrestling go back to greek times. muay thai has been developed for centuries in thailand. so, all the arts i like are technically "traditional" in that they have been developed over a long period of time. you can say that i really am a traditionalist!!! [​IMG]

    they all happen to have sports combat forms as a safe way to develop skills. so, instead of push hands or circle walking or forms, they actually have realistic sports forms (with restrictions of course for safety). but hey, even tai-chi has push hands competitions. whether this falls under "sports combat" is up to debate. [​IMG]

    btw, i've been to judo schools that sucked and i've been to judo schools with a dozen olympic competitors on the mat. i'm being very general when it comes to style vs. style arguments, but of course, in reality it is on a school by school basis.

    also, i didn't say that all military style schools are not effective. it's just that most of i've seen in the states have used the military slant as a marketing tool. there are a few krav maga and systema experts that i am friends with that i have a ton of respect for. however, without exception, they were successful competitors in judo, wrestling, or boxing beforehand.
     


  11. Thomas

    Thomas Senior member

    Messages:
    29,119
    Likes Received:
    1,303
    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2006
    Location:
    Texas
    These points go well with my old instructor - he taught Tae-Kwon-Do and kickboxing (ranked kickboxer back in the '80's), and then self-defense, and there wasn't much overlap. He fought differently according to the situation, and stressed the point that while form is a good thing to have, sometimes you just have to get out of a situation by any means necessary.

    Probably the best lesson was to avoid bad situations, look people in the eye, and then look for potential weapons you can use.
     


  12. Gradstudent78

    Gradstudent78 Senior member

    Messages:
    2,309
    Likes Received:
    18
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2003
    Location:
    Chicago
    when i say "traditional" i mean a style that doesn't focus in someway on 100% alive training (so maybe i should say "non-alive" martial arts). alive training meaning training with a 100% resisting opponent with as minimal restrictions as possible. point sparring does NOT fall into this. chi-sau or push hands does NOT fall into this.

    Any style trained "traditionally" would have had what you call alive training. Training not involving alive training is a relatively modern occurance.
     


  13. mizanation

    mizanation Senior member

    Messages:
    927
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Any style trained "traditionally" would have had what you call alive training. Training not involving alive training is a relatively modern occurance.

    agreed!

    All sports competitions have some level of rules. You shouldn't make the mistake of equating such compeitions with combat, they are not the same.

    also agree with you. evidence of this is seen when a sports jiu-jitsu or judo champ goes up against a good all-around mma fighter in an mma fight. the sports jiu-jitsu champ usually eats a lot of strikes because he is not used to being hit in certain positions. combining striking, clinching, ground and takedowns seemlessly is another skill altogether.

    however, mma is pretty close to actual combat. the first time i fought mma rules was a big eyeopener for me. i was a good striker, good ground fighter and good wrestler, but when i went up against someone who knew how to put everything together, it was very humbling.
     


  14. Man In Space

    Man In Space Senior member

    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Location:
    The Outer Periphery


  15. Gradstudent78

    Gradstudent78 Senior member

    Messages:
    2,309
    Likes Received:
    18
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2003
    Location:
    Chicago
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by