Did the STYLEman thread just vanish?

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by BlvdDandy, Feb 24, 2005.

  1. ernest

    ernest Senior member

    Messages:
    2,564
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2004
    Location:
    PARIS
    So censorship can only be made by a government?

    For exemple, the boss of a newspaper who asks his journalists no to talk about something = this is not censorship?

    What is the difference between censorship and moderation?

    Dictators calls their acts moderation/pacification too. Never censorship.
     


  2. Manton

    Manton RINO Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    41,574
    Likes Received:
    2,814
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2002
    Location:
    In Hiding
    Fill out these forms, and good luck. You will feel right at home. http://www.berkeley.edu/applying/
     


  3. Alexander Kabbaz

    Alexander Kabbaz Senior member

    Messages:
    1,272
    Likes Received:
    5
    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Location:
    East Hampton & New York
    WINNER.
     


  4. Manton

    Manton RINO Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    41,574
    Likes Received:
    2,814
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2002
    Location:
    In Hiding
    Yes.

    No.

    See above for the defintion of censorship.  Moderation is the regulation of participation in a private venue, by the owner of that venue.

    Well, if I had known that j was bent on world domination, I would never have joined the forum, much less sent him money.  Do you think he is really Styleman, the boy-wonder-master-of-the-universe?
     


  5. ernest

    ernest Senior member

    Messages:
    2,564
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2004
    Location:
    PARIS
    What do you mean?
     


  6. Mike

    Mike Senior member

    Messages:
    437
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2002
    Location:
    Detroit Area
    ernest, j is employing a method of self-censorship. In this way he is deleteing things which could be offensive to Styleforum members. Since he is the owner of this board he does it so he keeps his guests happy. Its a method in the vein of "a stich in time saves nine" {figured this is an appropriate analogy for a board about clothing.}. Self-censorship is what the motion picture association does so the government keeps its nose out of their affairs. While j doesn't have the threat of government intervention, he just wants to keep the visitors happy.

    j has only deleted things that were truly offensive and ignorant. Now, if he were to go through every post and edit language and view points that don't agree with his, then your case would hold more water. Until that point, I see no problem with stupid, ignorant, extremely racist comments to be deleted, at j and Steve's desire.
     


  7. Manton

    Manton RINO Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    41,574
    Likes Received:
    2,814
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2002
    Location:
    In Hiding
    It's not just the government they worry about but consumer boycotts and a lot of other pressures.
     


  8. MikeF

    MikeF Senior member

    Messages:
    462
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2002
    Where do you get this shit from?
     


  9. Brian SD

    Brian SD Moderator

    Messages:
    9,760
    Likes Received:
    122
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2004
    Location:
    Tokyo
    Well put, Mike.
     


  10. Mike

    Mike Senior member

    Messages:
    437
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2002
    Location:
    Detroit Area
    (Mike @ Feb. 24 2005,22:22) Self-censorship is what the motion picture association does so the government keeps its nose out of their affairs.
    It's not just the government they worry about but consumer boycotts and a lot of other pressures.
    Yes, this is true. I felt I should keep it simple.
     


  11. imageWIS

    imageWIS Senior member

    Messages:
    20,008
    Likes Received:
    97
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    New York City / Buenos Aires
    Unfortunately, as we have found out this week, our own government has also been involved in some fairly unsavory forms of censoring and controlling its media.
    I am confused. Are you referring to the Canadian government's banning the viewing of the Fox News Channel for 9 years until just last month?
    Um, you can get anything you want in any country on earth, its called satellite dish. That's right, you weren't dreaming, the Russians really did launch sputnik. Jon.
     


  12. linux_pro

    linux_pro Senior member

    Messages:
    551
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Unfortunately, as we have found out this week, our own government has also been involved in some fairly unsavory forms of censoring and controlling its media.
    I am confused. Are you referring to the Canadian government's banning the viewing of the Fox News Channel for 9 years until just last month?
    I definitely consider manipulation of the press to be a rather vile form of censorship. I won't go into that too much as this is not supposed to be a political forum. And I like boobs. Boobs are good. We need more boobs actually, and less beheadings. I thought CBS should have reprimanded Janet Jackson for not showing MORE boob. Dangit, all those years I've waited, and that's all we get?? If the world spent more time enjoying boobs and less time worrying about all the silly things like nationalism and religion, maybe we could get along a little better. Endorphins are wonderful. Sorry, trying to back out of the political stuff here. I think everyone here could agree that boobs are a great thing. Heh heh. And Sarah, if you read this, you know your boobs are the only ones I like. [​IMG]
     


  13. Manton

    Manton RINO Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    41,574
    Likes Received:
    2,814
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2002
    Location:
    In Hiding
    Maybe there's a way to pivot this back to clothing. Do boobs look better in a more structured silhouette, like Brioni? Or are they better served by a coat with some drape, like Kiton?
     


  14. Alexander Kabbaz

    Alexander Kabbaz Senior member

    Messages:
    1,272
    Likes Received:
    5
    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Location:
    East Hampton & New York
    CRTC APPROVES FOX NEWS FOR CANADA (SANITY COMES TO CANADA.)
    CBC News ^ | 11/18/04

    Posted on 11/18/2004 11:58:23 AM PST by areafiftyone

    OTTAWA - The conservative-leaning Fox News Channel will soon be coming to Canadian digital television channels.

    The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) approved an application Thursday to bring the Fox News Channel, one of the highest-rated news channels in the United States, onto Canadian digital airwaves.

    The Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA) applied to the broadcast regulator in April.

    Canadians already have access to the main Fox network, but not the right-leaning, 24-hour news channel, with its trademarked slogan of "fair and balanced."

    The Canadian Association of Broadcasters (CAB) opposed the application, saying it would discourage foreign broadcasters from partnering with Canadian broadcasters.

    However, in its decision, the CRTC said Fox News offers little Canadian coverage and is not "partially or totally competitive with any Canadian pay or specialty service." It added that the channel would "significantly boost digital penetration in Canada" and increase the availability of digital services in the country.

    The CRTC also approved the NFL Network, a 24-hour "lifestyle and entertainment" channel for football fans. It doesn't carry live games, with the exception of a few exhibition games.

    Past application rejected

    The CRTC rejected a CCTA application to bring Fox to Canada last November because Fox News U.S. and Winnipeg-based Global Television were planning to create Fox News Canada, a combination of U.S. and Canadian news.

    However, in March, a Fox U.S. executive said there were no plans to create the combined channel.

    The CRTC was thrust into the spotlight in July after giving conditional approval to the digital broadcast of Arab television station al-Jazeera.

    * FROM JULY 15, 2004: Al-Jazeera cleared for Canadian viewers

    The commission said Canadian carriers had to keep an "audio-visual recording" of the controversial network's broadcasts. It told Canadian distributors to monitor the broadcast 24 hours a day, giving them permission to "alter or curtail" programming to keep out abusive commentary, especially of an anti-Semitic nature.

    No Canadian distributors carry al-Jazeera.

    Fox was launched in 1996 by a former Republican advisor, Roger Ailes. It's a subsidiary of News Corp. Ltd., which is controlled by right-wing Australian media tycoon Rupert Murdoch.
     


  15. imageWIS

    imageWIS Senior member

    Messages:
    20,008
    Likes Received:
    97
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    New York City / Buenos Aires
    Originally Posted by Alexander Kabbaz,Feb. 24 2005,18:42
    I am confused. Are you referring to the Canadian government's banning the viewing of the Fox News Channel for 9 years until just last month?

    I definitely consider manipulation of the press to be a rather vile form of censorship. I won't go into that too much as this is not supposed to be a political forum. And I like boobs. Boobs are good. We need more boobs actually, and less beheadings. I thought CBS should have reprimanded Janet Jackson for not showing MORE boob. Dangit, all those years I've waited, and that's all we get?? If the world spent more time enjoying boobs and less time worrying about all the silly things like nationalism and religion, maybe we could get along a little better. Endorphins are wonderful. Sorry, trying to back out of the political stuff here. I think everyone here could agree that boobs are a great thing. Heh heh. And Sarah, if you read this, you know your boobs are the only ones I like. [​IMG]
    Boobs are great. Look, we even have one for a President. Thus, every time Bush is on TV I see a boob. Jon.
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by