pontifex
Member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2010
- Messages
- 12
- Reaction score
- 0
You're in Toronto . . . call Mike Holmes.
lefty
I think Mike is booked.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
You're in Toronto . . . call Mike Holmes.
I think brick houses look better unpainted.
Normally, sure. But your house is made from two bricks, which are unequal in color, geometry, and their degree of rustification. You don't have another option to amend that.
Don't take advise from contractors.
If you can't afford the cost to do something right, don't do it. Half-ass design improvements not only fail to solve the problems, but they waste the money you or the next buyer will need to fix it next time. You're probably in over your head.
It might lower the value of the house.
It's cluttered in that your house is made from two different houses.
So you're referring to the brick vs. the stone?
.Finally I bid too much on this one, assuming I would lose anyways. Guess what, I won. Lucky me.
Well, I didn't say just start bashing away (although there probably isn't anything fancier than that to do). It might be incredibly well attached to the old brick, which will mean it will be a chipping job being careful not to do much damage to the old brick....or it might just fall off real easy...depends how well it's attached.I said I could probably remove the angel stone myself, but that doesn't mean it's a good idea for me to just start doing that. I mean, I could probably find a blunt object and some kind of chisel and attack it. Maybe that would just create a large mess. Maybe I would damage the underlying brick.
You don't have to build a new one...they look fine without them. At any rate, what choice do you have...what's there is already the worse case scenario. Removing it is a one-day job...hire a couple of guys to dismantle the thing and take it away.I want a presentable front of the house, but not if I have to rip down the balcony and build a new one.
These days...most people think so. There was a time when painted brick was in style....some of that "orange" Toronto brick wasn't considered attractive for a while. The two-toned brick facades are the favourites. I think painted brick facades lends themselves more towards classic styling (like georgian), rather than victorian. With victorians, you paint the wood details. Plus, brick needs to breathe, so you need to be careful about what your slapping on. Plus paint in our climate doesn't last that long. Most people paint to avoid proper restoration. I think the victorian brick facade is too important to cut any corners on...I think it's one thing that should be done right. It will look great...be a great source of pride of ownership, and increase the value of your home.I think brick houses look better unpainted